Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published July 8, 2024 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Stakeholder mapping to support invasive non-native species management in South America

Creators

  • 1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean, Santiago, Chile
  • 2. University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom|Instituto de Ecología Regional (UNT-CONICET), Tucumán, Argentina|Aves Argentinas/Asociación Ornitológica del Plata, CABA, Argentina
  • 3. Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity (IEB), Santiago, Chile|Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile
  • 4. Instituto de Investigaciόn en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC, CSIC-ULM-JCCM), Ciudad Real, Spain|Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • 5. Instituto Federal Goiano, Urutaí, Brazil|Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rio Claro, Brazil
  • 6. Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Halle, Germany|Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rio Claro, Brazil|German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
  • 7. Fundación Legado Chile, Puerto Varas, Chile|Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile
  • 8. University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
  • 9. Universidad Nacional del Comahue, San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina
  • 10. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata-CONICET, Mar del Plata, Argentina
  • 11. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina|Instituto de Ecología Regional (UNT-CONICET), Tucumán, Argentina
  • 12. University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
  • 13. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas-Fundación Bariloche, San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina|Aves Argentinas/Asociación Ornitológica del Plata, CABA, Argentina
  • 14. Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rio Claro, Brazil
  • 15. Instituto de Ecología Regional (UNT- CONICET), Tucumán, Argentina|Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • 16. University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom|University of Stellenbosch, Bellville, South Africa
  • 17. Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero, Gobierno de Chile, Valdivia, Chile
  • 18. Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile
  • 19. Aves Argentinas/Asociación Ornitológica del Plata, CABA, Argentina|Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas-Fundación Bariloche, San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina

Description

Effective long-term management of invasive non-native species (INNS) in South America is a pressing yet complex task. Critically, the environmental, historical, cultural, and economic idiosyncrasies of the region call for the inclusion of a plurality of views from those sectors of society receiving the negative and positive impacts of INNS. This is a multifaceted, and often daunting, task that can be aided by an early identification of stakeholders – those affected by or with an interest in INNS and their management – accompanied by targeted stakeholder engagement. Here, we report the procedures and results of a stakeholder mapping activity aimed at identifying stakeholders and designing engagement strategies. Using expert knowledge procedures, we compiled comprehensive lists of stakeholders for six case-studies in South America: (i) invasive grasses (Urochloa spp.) in Brazil; (ii) glossy privet (Ligustrum lucidum) in Argentina; (iii) lodgepole and Monterey pines (Pinus contorta and P. radiata) in Argentina; (iv) American mink (Neogale vison) in Argentina and Chile; (v) lodgepole and Monterey pines in Chile; and (vi) German yellow-jacket (Vespula germanica) in Chile. Overall, we identified 250 stakeholders, which, based on their interest and influence, were classified into "context settlers" (2%), "key players" (47%), "crowd" (5%), and "subjects" (49%). We outlined strategies to engage with each of these four groups and for each of our six case-studies. Across case studies, communication with stakeholders was the most common engagement strategy proposed (27%; 19 of 70 strategies), followed by active involvement of stakeholders in INNS research and management (23%). Our results highlight the importance of considering power imbalances, as those stakeholders more likely to benefit from INNS were assessed to have more influence over INNS management relative to local and indigenous communities. Our work illustrates how to identify stakeholders in a rigorous and rapid manner, which should be complemented with the involvement of the stakeholders themselves.

Files

NB_article_121386.pdf

Files (1.9 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:a9961efa3fd23e95c56608a426d85d0a
1.9 MB Preview Download

System files (244.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:d1b5c52b3c16409b000f295880b30b8b
244.9 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Cites
Publication: 10.1071/9781486308880 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/2041-210X.12844 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.pecon.2021.06.002 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279601 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1093/biosci/biy076 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1038/s41893-020-0552-3 (DOI)
Publication: 10.3897/neobiota.19.4897 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1002/fee.2000 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1002/fee.2658 (DOI)
Publication: 10.3897/neobiota.61.58380 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.10.013 (DOI)
Publication: 10.3897/neobiota.68.60816 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126366 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1038/s41893-021-00755-x (DOI)
Publication: 10.1002/9781118506196 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/1365-2664.12817 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/978-1-137-50572-9 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s00267-022-01739-z (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10530-018-1814-0 (DOI)
Publication: 10.25260/EA.15.25.2.0.154 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1038/s41586-021-03405-6 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1002/wat2.1476 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/fme.12574 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1038/ncomms12485 (DOI)
Publication: 10.5285/450fd469-5cd7-4c8f-b113-ba469c358caf (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/gcb.15199 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107131 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1017/S0376892922000406 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1093/biosci/biaa139 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s00267-021-01541-3 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10530-016-1282-3 (DOI)
Publication: 10.3897/neobiota.43.31619 (DOI)
Publication: 10.3897/neobiota.59.52022 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.tree.2023.01.006 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1093/biosci/biac099 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.021 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10530-022-02953-w (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/978-3-642-20992-5_1 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102705 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.059 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10530-009-9517-1 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.001 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10530-016-1199-x (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10530-017-1506-1 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.053 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/2041-210X.12757 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10531-023-02666-z (DOI)
Publication: 10.1002/2688-8319.12272 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/brv.12627 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.008 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1505/146554814813484121 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10530-020-02298-2 (DOI)
Publication: 10.3389/fevo.2017.00149 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/1365-2435.13544 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.tree.2022.08.005 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/gcb.15333 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.045 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.044 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10530-011-0162-0 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5283-5_27 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.tree.2023.02.007 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/geb.12517 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1089/env.2017.0017 (DOI)
Publication: 10.3897/neobiota.62.52793 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001729 (DOI)
Publication: 10.31055/1851.2372.v58.n1.38462 (DOI)
Has part
Other: 10.3897/neobiota.93.121386.suppl3 (DOI)
Other: 10.3897/neobiota.93.121386.suppl2 (DOI)
Other: 10.3897/neobiota.93.121386.suppl4 (DOI)
Other: 10.3897/neobiota.93.121386.suppl1 (DOI)
Other: 10.3897/neobiota.93.121386.suppl5 (DOI)

References

  • Alter T, Martin P, Hine D, Howard T (2019) Community-based control of invasive species. Csiro Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1071/9781486308880
  • Bacher S, Blackburn TM, Essl F, Genovesi P, Heikkilä J, Jeschke JM, Jones G, Keller R, Kenis M, Kueffer C, Martinou AF, Nentwig W, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Rabitsch W, Richardson DM, Roy HE, Saul W-C, Scalera R, Vilà M, Wilson JRU, Kumschick S (2018) Socio-economic impact classification of alien taxa (SEICAT). Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9(1): 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12844
  • Baggio R, Overbeck GE, Durigan G, Pillar VD (2021) To graze or not to graze: A core question for conservation and sustainable use of grassy ecosystems in Brazil. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation 19(3): 256–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2021.06.002
  • Ballari SA, Barrios-García MN (2022) Mismatch between media coverage and research on invasive species: The case of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Argentina. PLoS One 17(12): e0279601. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279601
  • Banks PB, Byrom AE, Pech RP, Dickman CR (2018) Reinvasion is not invasion again. Bioscience 68(10): 792–804. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy076
  • Bateman IJ, Mace GM (2020) The natural capital framework for sustainably efficient and equitable decision making. Nature Sustainability 3(10): 776–783. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0552-3
  • Bayliss H, Stewart G, Wilcox A, Randall N (2013) A perceived gap between invasive species research and stakeholder priorities. NeoBiota 19: 67–82. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.19.4897
  • Beever EA, Simberloff D, Crowley SL, Al-Chokhachy R, Jackson HA, Petersen SL (2019) Social–ecological mismatches create conservation challenges in introduced species management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 17(2): 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2000
  • Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarošík V, Wilson JR, Richardson DM (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26(7): 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023
  • Brandt AJ, Png GK, Jo I, McGrannachan C, Allen K, Peltzer DA, D'Antonio C, Dickie IA, French K, Leishman MR, Ostertag R, Parker IM, Stanley MC, Suding KN, Bellingham PJ (2023) Managing multi-species plant invasions when interactions influence their impact. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 21(8): 370–379. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2658
  • Bridger JC, Alter TR, Frumento PZ, Howard TM, Adams LB (2019) Community engagement theory for a new natural resource management paradigm. Community-based Control of Invasive Species: 84.
  • Brundu G, Pauchard A, Pyšek P, Pergl J, Bindewald AM, Brunori A, Canavan S, Campagnaro T, Celesti-Grapow L, Dechoum M de S, Dufour-Dror J-M, Essl F, Flory SL, Genovesi P, Guarino F, Guangzhe L, Hulme PE, Jäger H, Kettle CJ, Krumm F, Langdon B, Lapin K, Lozano V, Le Roux JJ, Novoa A, Nuñez MA, Porté AJ, Silva JS, Schaffner U, Sitzia T, Tanner R, Tshidada N, Vítková M, Westergren M, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM (2020) Global guidelines for the sustainable use of non-native trees to prevent tree invasions and mitigate their negative impacts. NeoBiota 61: 65–116. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.61.58380
  • Bryce R, Oliver MK, Davies L, Gray H, Urquhart J, Lambin X (2011) Turning back the tide of American mink invasion at an unprecedented scale through community participation and adaptive management. Biological Conservation 144(1): 575–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.10.013
  • Canessa S, Trask AE, Ewen JG (2021) Mind the gap (between assessing risks and prioritizing management). NeoBiota 68: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.68.60816
  • Carpouron CJ, Zuël N, Monty MLF, Florens FBV (2023) Breeding success of an endangered island endemic kestrel increases with extent of invasion by an alien plant species. Journal for Nature Conservation 72: 126366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126366
  • Chambers JM, Wyborn C, Ryan ME, Reid RS, Riechers M, Serban A, Bennett NJ, Cvitanovic C, Fernández-Giménez ME, Galvin KA, Goldstein BE, Klenk NL, Tengö M, Brennan R, Cockburn JJ, Hill R, Munera C, Nel JL, Österblom H, Bednarek AT, Bennett EM, Brandeis A, Charli-Joseph L, Chatterton P, Curran K, Dumrongrojwatthana P, Durán AP, Fada SJ, Gerber J-D, Green JMH, Guerrero AM, Haller T, Horcea-Milcu A-I, Leimona B, Montana J, Rondeau R, Spierenburg M, Steyaert P, Zaehringer JG, Gruby R, Hutton J, Pickering T (2021) Six modes of co-production for sustainability. Nature Sustainability 4(11): 983–996. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00755-x
  • Comité Operativo para la Prevención, el Control y la Erradicación de las Especies Exóticas Invasoras (2014) Estrategia Nacional Integrada para la Prevenciόn, el Control y/o Erradicación de las Especies Exóticas Invasoras. Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, 1–26.
  • Conroy MJ, Peterson JT (2013) Decision making in natural resource management: a structured, adaptive approach. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118506196
  • Crowley SL, Hinchliffe S, McDonald RA (2017) Invasive species management will benefit from social impact assessment. Journal of Applied Ecology 54(2): 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12817
  • De Castro F, Hogenboom B, Baud M (2016) Environmental Governance in Latin America. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-50572-9
  • De la Mora G (2023) Conceptual and Analytical Diversity of Environmental Governance in Latin America: A Systematic Review. Environmental Management 71(4): 847–866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01739-z
  • Dechoum M de S, Giehl ELH, Sühs RB, Silveira TCL, Ziller SR (2019) Citizen engagement in the management of non-native invasive pines: Does it make a difference? Biological Invasions 21(1): 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1814-0
  • Defossé GE (2015) ¿Conviene seguir fomentando las plantaciones forestales en el norte de la Patagonia? Ecología Austral 25(2): 93–100. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.15.25.2.0.154
  • Diagne C, Leroy B, Vaissière A-C, Gozlan RE, Roiz D, Jarić I, Salles J-M, Bradshaw CJA, Courchamp F (2021) High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide. Nature 592(7855): 571–576. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03405-6
  • Dunham JB, Arismendi I, Murphy C, Koeberle A, Olivos JA, Pearson J, Pickens F, Roon D, Stevenson J (2020) What to do when invaders are out of control? WIREs. Water 7(5): e1476. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1476
  • Dunham J, Benjamin JR, Lawrence DJ, Clifford K (2022) Resist, accept, and direct responses to biological invasions: A social–ecological perspective. Fisheries Management and Ecology 29(4): 475–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12574
  • Early R, Bradley BA, Dukes JS, Lawler JJ, Olden JD, Blumenthal DM, Gonzalez P, Grosholz ED, Ibanez I, Miller LP, Sorte CJB, Tatem AJ (2016) Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities. Nature Communications 7(1): 12485. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12485
  • Erazo M, García Díaz P, Langdon B, Mustin K, Cava M, Damasceno G, Huerta MF, Linardaki E, Moyano J, Montti L, Powell PA, Bodey TW, Burslem DFRP, Fasola L, Fidelis A, Lambin X, Marinaro S, Pauchard A, Phimister E, Raffo E, Rodríguez-Jorquera I, Roesler I, Tomasevic JA, Pizarro JC (2024) Expert-based stakeholder mapping and engagement strategies for six invasive non-native species case studies in Argentina, Brazil, and Chile, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5285/450fd469-5cd7-4c8f-b113-ba469c358caf
  • Essl F, Lenzner B, Bacher S, Bailey S, Capinha C, Daehler C, Dullinger S, Genovesi P, Hui C, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Katsanevakis S, Kühn I, Leung B, Liebhold A, Liu C, MacIsaac HJ, Meyerson LA, Nuñez MA, Pauchard A, Pyšek P, Rabitsch W, Richardson DM, Roy HE, Ruiz GM, Russell JC, Sanders NJ, Sax DF, Scalera R, Seebens H, Springborn M, Turbelin A, van Kleunen M, von Holle B, Winter M, Zenni RD, Mattsson BJ, Roura-Pascual N (2020) Drivers of future alien species impacts: An expert-based assessment. Global Change Biology 26(9): 4880–4893. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15199
  • Etxano I, Villalba-Eguiluz U (2021) Twenty-five years of social multi-criteria evaluation (SMCE) in the search for sustainability: Analysis of case studies. Ecological Economics 188: 107131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107131
  • Faria L, de Carvalho BM, Carneiro L, Miiller NOR, Pedroso CR, Occhi TVT, Tonella LH, Vitule JRS (2023) Invasive species policy in Brazil: A review and critical analysis. Environmental Conservation 50(1): 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892922000406
  • Frumento PZ, Whitmer WE, Alter TR, Muth AB, Marshall DP, Shuffstall WC (2019) Strategy and practice for community engagement. In: Martin P, Alter TR, Hine D, Howard T (Eds) Community-based control of invasive species. CSIRO – CABI, Clayton South, VIC, Australia; Wallingford, UK; Boston, USA, 97–121.
  • García-Díaz P, Cassey P, Norbury G, Lambin X, Montti L, Pizarro JC, Powell PA, Burslem DF, Cava M, Damasceno G, Fasola L, Fidelis A, Huerta MF, Langdon B, Linardaki E, Moyano J, Núñez MA, Pauchard A, Phimister E, Raffo E, Roesler I, Rodríguez-Jorquera I, Tomasevic JA (2021) Management Policies for Invasive Alien Species: Addressing the Impacts Rather than the Species. Bioscience 71(2): 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa139
  • García-Díaz P, Montti L, Powell PA, Phimister E, Pizarro JC, Fasola L, Langdon B, Pauchard A, Raffo E, Bastías J, Damasceno G, Fidelis A, Huerta MF, Linardaki E, Moyano J, Núñez MA, Ortiz MI, Rodríguez-Jorquera I, Roesler I, Tomasevic JA, Burslem DFRP, Cava M, Lambin X (2022) Identifying Priorities, Targets, and Actions for the Long-term Social and Ecological Management of Invasive Non-Native Species. Environmental Management 69(1): 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01541-3
  • GEKKO, Grupo de Estudios en Conservación y Manejo, Departamento de Biología, Bioquímica y Farmacia (2023) InBiAr. Base de Datos sobre Invasiones Biológicas en Argentina. http://www.inbiar.uns.edu.ar/especies [August 7, 2023]
  • Glen AS, Latham MC, Anderson D, Leckie C, Niemiec R, Pech RP, Byrom AE (2017) Landholder participation in regional-scale control of invasive predators: An adaptable landscape model. Biological Invasions 19(1): 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1282-3
  • Gobierno de Argentina: Lista oficial de especies exóticas en Argentina. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/ambiente/biodiversidad/exoticas-invasoras/lista
  • Groves CR, Game ET (2016) Conservation planning: informed decisions for a healthier planet. Roberts and Company Publishers, Greenwood Village, Colorado, USA, 580 pp.
  • Kapitza K, Zimmermann H, Martín-López B, von Wehrden H (2019) Research on the social perception of invasive species: A systematic literature review. NeoBiota 43: 47–68. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.43.31619
  • Lambin X, Burslem D, Caplat P, Cornulier T, Gabriella D, Fasola L, Fidelis A, García-Díaz P, Langdon B, Linardaki E (2020) CONTAIN: Optimising the long-term management of invasive alien species using adaptive management. NeoBiota 59: 119–138. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.59.52022
  • Lockwood JL, Lieurance D, Flory SL, Meyerson LA, Ricciardi A, Simberloff D (2023) Moving scholarship on invasion science forward. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 38(6): 495–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2023.01.006
  • Löfqvist S, Kleinschroth F, Bey A, de Bremond A, DeFries R, Dong J, Fleischman F, Lele S, Martin DA, Messerli P, Meyfroidt P, Pfeifer M, Rakotonarivo SO, Ramankutty N, Ramprasad V, Rana P, Rhemtulla JM, Ryan CM, Vieira ICG, Wells GJ, Garrett RD (2023) How social considerations improve the equity and effectiveness of ecosystem restoration. Bioscience 73(2): 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac099
  • Martin A, Coolsaet B, Corbera E, Dawson NM, Fraser JA, Lehmann I, Rodriguez I (2016) Justice and conservation: The need to incorporate recognition. Biological Conservation 197: 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.021
  • Mason NW, Kirk NA, Price RJ, Law R, Bowman R, Sprague RI (2023) Science for social licence to arrest an ecosystem-transforming invasion. Biological Invasions 25(3): 873–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-022-02953-w
  • MERCOSUR (2019) Lineamientos para la Elaboración de un Plan para la Prevención, Monitoreo, Control y Mitigación de las Especies Exóticas Invasoras. https://www.iri.edu.ar/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/tm2019GMCres38.pdf
  • Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible (2022) Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Exóticas Invasoras. Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible de la Nación, 1–144.
  • Mittermeier RA, Turner WR, Larsen FW, Brooks TM, Gascon C (2011) Global biodiversity conservation: the critical role of hotspots. In: Zachos FE, Habel JC (Eds) Biodiversity hotspots: distribution and protection of conservation priority areas. Springer, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20992-5_1
  • Newig J, Jager NW, Challies E, Kochskämper E (2023) Does stakeholder participation improve environmental governance? Evidence from a meta-analysis of 305 case studies. Global Environmental Change 82: 102705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102705
  • Norström AV, Cvitanovic C, Löf MF, West S, Wyborn C, Balvanera P, Bednarek AT, Bennett EM, Biggs R, de Bremond A, Campbell BM, Canadell JG, Carpenter SR, Folke C, Fulton EA, Gaffney O, Gelcich S, Jouffray J-B, Leach M, Le Tissier M, Martín-López B, Louder E, Loutre M-F, Meadow AM, Nagendra H, Payne D, Peterson GD, Reyers B, Scholes R, Speranza CI, Spierenburg M, Stafford-Smith M, Tengö M, van der Hel S, van Putten I, Österblom H (2020) Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nature Sustainability 3(3): 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2
  • Novoa A, Shackleton R, Canavan S, Cybele C, Davies SJ, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Fried J, Gaertner M, Geerts S, Griffiths CL, Kaplan H, Kumschick S, Le Maitre DC, Measey GJ, Nunes AL, Richardson DM, Robinson TB, Touza J, Wilson JRU (2018) A framework for engaging stakeholders on the management of alien species. Journal of Environmental Management 205: 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.059
  • Núñez MA, Pauchard A (2010) Biological invasions in developing and developed countries: Does one model fit all? Biological Invasions 12(4): 707–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9517-1
  • Oberlack C, Tejada L, Messerli P, Rist S, Giger M (2016) Sustainable livelihoods in the global land rush? Archetypes of livelihood vulnerability and sustainability potentials. Global Environmental Change 41: 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.001
  • Oliver MK, Piertney SB, Zalewski A, Melero Y, Lambin X (2016) The compensatory potential of increased immigration following intensive American mink population control is diluted by male-biased dispersal. Biological Invasions 18(10): 3047–3061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1199-x
  • Omondiagbe HA, Towns DR, Wood JK, Bollard-Breen B (2017) Stakeholders and social networks identify potential roles of communities in sustainable management of invasive species. Biological Invasions 19(10): 3037–3049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1506-1
  • Pagès M, Fischer A, van der Wal R, Lambin X (2019) Empowered communities or "cheap labour"? Engaging volunteers in the rationalised management of invasive alien species in Great Britain. Journal of Environmental Management 229: 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.053
  • Parrott L (2017) The modelling spiral for solving 'wicked' environmental problems: Guidance for stakeholder involvement and collaborative model development. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 8(8): 1005–1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12757
  • Pelicice FM, Agostinho AA, Alves CBM, Arcifa MS, Azevedo-Santos VM, Brito MFG, de Brito PS, de Castro Campanha PMG, Carvalho FR, da Costa GC, Cozzuol MA, Cunico AM, Dagosta FCP, Dias RM, Fernandes R, Franco ACS, Garcia DAZ, Giarrizzo T, Gubiani ÉA, Guimarães EC, Ikeda L, Katz AM, Magalhães ALB, Montag LFA, Nogueira MAMP, Orsi ML, Ottoni FP, Pavanelli CS, Peixoto TG, Petry AC, Pompeu PS, Ramos TPA, Rodrigues LRR, Sabino J, Sampaio WMS, dos Santos VLM, Smith WS, Souza G, Tonella LH, Vitule JRS, Montag LF de A, Nogueira MAM de P, Orsi ML, Ottoni FP, Pavanelli CS, Peixoto TG, Petry AC, Pompeu PS, Ramos TPA, Rodrigues LRR, Sabino J, Sampaio WMS, dos Santos VLM, Smith WS, Souza G, Tonella LH, Vitule JRS (2023) Unintended consequences of valuing the contributions of non-native species: Misguided conservation initiatives in a megadiverse region. Biodiversity and Conservation 32(12): 3915–3938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-023-02666-z
  • PNUD (2017) Catálogo de las especies exóticas asilvestradas/naturalizadas en Chile.
  • Powell PA, García-Díaz P, Fernández Cánepa G, Grau A, Herrera L, Nuñez C, Quiroga MP, Quiroga PA, Rojas TN, Ruiz de Huidobro N, Speziale KL, Vidal-Russell R, Zaninovich S, Montti L (2023) Insights from experiences comanaging woody invasive alien plants in Argentina. Ecological Solutions and Evidence 4(4): e12272. https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12272
  • Pyšek P, Hulme PE, Simberloff D, Bacher S, Blackburn TM, Carlton JT, Dawson W, Essl F, Foxcroft LC, Genovesi P, Jeschke JM, Kühn I, Liebhold AM, Mandrak NE, Meyerson LA, Pauchard A, Pergl J, Roy HE, Seebens H, van Kleunen M, Vilà M, Wingfield MJ, Richardson DM (2020) Scientists' warning on invasive alien species. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 95(6): 1511–1534. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12627
  • Raymond CM, Cebrian-Piqueras MA, Andersson E, Andrade R, Schnell AA, Romanelli BB, Filyushkina A, Goodson DJ, Horcea-Milcu A, Johnson DN (2022) Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Tensions and prospects. One Earth 5(3): 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.008
  • Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation 141(10): 2417–2431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
  • Reed MS, Oughton L (2017) Stakeholder analysis. Soil Care for profitable and sustainable crop production in Europe, Newcastle, UK.
  • Reed MS, Graves A, Dandy N, Posthumus H, Hubacek K, Morris J, Prell C, Quinn CH, Stringer LC (2009) Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management 90(5): 1933–1949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001
  • Reyes R, Nelson H (2014) A tale of two forests: Why forests and forest conflicts are both growing in Chile. International Forestry Review 16(4): 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554814813484121
  • Robertson PA, Mill A, Novoa A, Jeschke JM, Essl F, Gallardo B, Geist J, Jarić I, Lambin X, Musseau C, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Rabitsch W, von Schmalensee M, Shirley M, Strayer DL, Stefansson RA, Smith K, Booy O (2020) A proposed unified framework to describe the management of biological invasions. Biological Invasions 22(9): 2633–2645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-020-02298-2
  • Samson E, Hirsch PE, Palmer SC, Behrens JW, Brodin T, Travis JM (2017) Early Engagement of Stakeholders with Individual-Based Modeling Can Inform Research for Improving Invasive Species Management: The Round Goby as a Case Study. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 5: 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00149
  • Sapsford SJ, Brandt AJ, Davis KT, Peralta G, Dickie IA, Gibson RD, Green JL, Hulme PE, Nuñez MA, Orwin KH, Pauchard A, Wardle DA, Peltzer DA (2020) Towards a framework for understanding the context dependence of impacts of non‐native tree species. Functional Ecology 34: 944–955. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13544
  • Sax DF, Schlaepfer MA, Olden JD (2022) Valuing the contributions of non-native species to people and nature. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 37(12): 1058–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2022.08.005
  • Seebens H, Bacher S, Blackburn TM, Capinha C, Dawson W, Dullinger S, Genovesi P, Hulme PE, van Kleunen M, Kühn I, Jeschke JM, Lenzner B, Liebhold AM, Pattison Z, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Winter M, Essl F (2021) Projecting the continental accumulation of alien species through to 2050. Global Change Biology 27(5): 970–982. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15333
  • Shackleton RT, Richardson DM, Shackleton CM, Bennett B, Crowley SL, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Estévez RA, Fischer A, Kueffer C, Kull CA, Marchante E, Novoa A, Potgieter LJ, Vaas J, Vaz AS, Larson BMH (2019a) Explaining people's perceptions of invasive alien species: A conceptual framework. Journal of Environmental Management 229: 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.045
  • Shackleton RT, Adriaens T, Brundu G, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Estévez RA, Fried J, Larson BM, Liu S, Marchante E, Marchante H, Moshobane MC, Novoa A, Reed M, Richardson DM (2019b) Stakeholder engagement in the study and management of invasive alien species. Journal of Environmental Management 229: 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.044
  • Speziale KL, Lambertucci SA, Carrete M, Tella JL (2012) Dealing with non-native species: What makes the difference in South America? Biological Invasions 14(8): 1609–1621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0162-0
  • Stokes KE, O'FNeill KP, Montgomery WI, Dick JTA, Maggs CA, McDonald RA (2006) The importance of stakeholder engagement in invasive species management: A cross-jurisdictional perspective in Ireland. In: Hawksworth DL, Bull AT (Eds) Human Exploitation and Biodiversity Conservation. Springer, Dordrecht, 2829–2852. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5283-5_27
  • Tedesco AM, López-Cubillos S, Chazdon R, Rhodes JR, Archibald CL, Pérez-Hämmerle K-V, Brancalion PH, Wilson KA, Oliveira M, Correa DF, Ota L, Morrison TH, Possingham HP, Mills M, Santos FC, Dean AJ (2023) Beyond ecology: Ecosystem restoration as a process for social-ecological transformation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 38(7): 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2023.02.007
  • Turbelin AJ, Malamud BD, Francis RA (2016) Mapping the global state of invasive alien species: Patterns of invasion and policy responses. Global Ecology and Biogeography 26(1): 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12517
  • Ulloa A (2017) Perspectives of Environmental Justice from Indigenous Peoples of Latin America: A Relational Indigenous Environmental Justice. Environmental Justice 10(6): 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2017.0017
  • Vimercati G, Kumschick S, Probert AF, Volery L, Bacher S (2020) The importance of assessing positive and beneficial impacts of alien species. NeoBiota 62: 525–545. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.62.52793
  • Vimercati G, Probert AF, Volery L, Bernardo-Madrid R, Bertolino S, Céspedes V, Essl F, Evans T, Gallardo B, Gallien L, González-Moreno P, Grange MC, Hui C, Jeschke JM, Katsanevakis S, Kühn I, Kumschick S, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Rieseberg L, Robinson TB, Saul W-C, Sorte CJB, Vilà M, Wilson JRU, Bacher S (2022) The EICAT+ framework enables classification of positive impacts of alien taxa on native biodiversity. PLoS Biology 20(8): e3001729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001729
  • Zaninovich SC, Herrera L, Carro NG, Zugasti EAG, Montti L (2023) Bases para el manejo adaptativo de la leñosa invasora Acacia melanoxylon (Fabaceae) en la Reserva Natural Privada Paititi, sierras del Sistema de Tandilia, Argentina. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 58(1): 21–30. https://doi.org/10.31055/1851.2372.v58.n1.38462
  • Ziller S, Zenni R, Souza Bastos L, Possato Rossi V, Wong LJ, Pagad S (2020) Global register of introduced and invasive species – Brazil. Version 1.5. Checklist dataset/Invasive Species Specialist Group ISSG.