Published July 7, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Principles for creating a single authoritative list of the world's species

  • 1. Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia
  • 2. Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, Australia
  • 3. Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • 4. School of Environment, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand & Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord University, BodØ, Norway
  • 5. Natural History Museum Vienna, Vienna, Austria & Department of Evolutionary Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria & Department of Genetics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
  • 6. Species 2000, Naturalis, Leiden, the Netherlands
  • 7. National Genomics Data Center, Beijing Institute of Genomics (China National Center for Bioinformation), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 8. CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow, India
  • 9. Earth & Oceanic Systems Group, RMIT, Melbourne, Australia & Museums Victoria, Carlton, Australia
  • 10. Species 2000, Canberra, Australia
  • 11. School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona, Arizona, United States of America & Arizona Institutes for Resilience, University of Arizona, Arizona, United States of America
  • 12. Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Canberra, Australia & Sessional Committee, Scientific Council, Convention on Migratory Species, Bonn, Germany
  • 13. Department of Earth Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom & Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia
  • 14. B. P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawai'i, United States of America
  • 15. Chelonian Research Institute, Oviedo, Florida, United States of America
  • 16. Global Wildlife Conservation, Austin, Texas, United States of America
  • 17. Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Canberra, Australia
  • 18. Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • 19. Taxonomy Australia, Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, Australia

Description

Garnett, Stephen T., Christidis, Les, Conix, Stijn, Costello, Mark J., Zachos, Frank E., Bánki, Olaf S., Bao, Yiming, Barik, Saroj K., Buckeridge, John S., Hobern, Donald, Lien, Aaron, Montgomery, Narelle, Nikolaeva, Svetlana, Pyle, Richard L., Thomson, Scott A., van Dijk, Peter Paul, Whalen, Anthony, Zhang, Zhi-Qiang, Thiele, Kevin R. (2020): Principles for creating a single authoritative list of the world's species. PLOS Biology 18 (7): 1-10, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000736, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000736

Files

source.pdf

Files (856.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:366fea7f4824f5ce5166678ce1ea5dfa
856.5 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:366FEA7F4824FFCE5166FF8CFFEAFFFA

References

  • 1. Garnett ST, Christidis L. Taxonomy anarchy hampers conservation. Nature 2017; 546: 25-27. https:// doi.org/10.1038/546025a PMID: 28569833
  • 2. Garnett ST, Christidis L. Science-based taxonomy still needs better governance: Response to Thomson et al. PLoS Biol.2018; 16: e2005249. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005249 PMID: 29538369
  • 3. Thomson SA, Pyle RL, Ahyong ST, Alonso-Zarazaga M, Ammirati J, Araya JF, et al. Taxonomy based on science is necessary for global conservation. PLoS Biol. 2018; 16: e2005075. https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pbio.2005075 PMID: 29538381
  • 4. Costello MJ, Wieczorek J. Best practice for biodiversity data management and publication. Biol Conserv, 2014; 173: 68-73.
  • 5. Riddle BR, Hafner DJ. Species as units of analysis in ecology and biogeography: time to take the blinders off.Global Ecol Biogeog. 1999; 8: 433-441.
  • 6. Faurby S, Eiserhardt WL, Svenning JC. Strong effects of variation in taxonomic opinion on diversification analyses. Meth Ecol Evol. 2016; 7: 4-13.
  • 7. Zachos FE. Species Concepts in Biology. Historical Development, Theoretical Foundations and Practical Relevance. Switzerland: Springer; 2016.
  • 8. Zachos FE. Mammals and meaningful taxonomic units: the debate about species concepts and conservation. Mammal Rev. 2018; 48: 153-159.
  • 9. Zachos FE, Christidis L, Garnett ST. Mammalian species and the twofold nature of taxonomy: a comment on Taylor et al. 2019. Mammalia 2020; 84: 1-5.
  • 10. Kehlmaier C, Zhang X, Georges A, Campbell PD, Thomson S, Fritz U. Mitogenomics of historical type specimens of Australasian turtles:clarification of taxonomic confusion and old mitochondrial introgression. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 5841. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42310-x PMID: 30967590
  • 11. Costello MJ, Bouchet P, Boxshall G, Fauchald K, Gordon D, Hoeksema BW, et al. Global coordination and standardisation in marine biodiversity through the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) and related databases. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: e51629. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051629 PMID: 23505408
  • 12. Costello MJ, Horton T, Kroh A. Sustainable biodiversity databasing: international, collaborative, dynamic, centralised. Trends Ecol Evol. 2018; 33: 803-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.08.006 PMID: 30213659
  • 13. Bisby FA. The quiet revolution:biodiversity informatics and the internet. Science. 2000; 289: 2309- 2312. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.548 8.230 9 PMID: 11009408
  • 14. Bisby FA, Shimura J, Ruggiero M, Edwards J, Haeuser C. Taxonomy, at the click of a mouse. Nature. 2002; 418: 367.
  • 15. Roskov Y, Ower G, Orrell T, Nicolson D, Bailly N, Kirk PM et al. eds. Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life, 2019 Annual Checklist. Internet. 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 22]. Available from: www.catalogueoflife. org/annual-checklist/2019
  • 16. Ekers R. The Prague IAU General Assembly, Pluto and the IAU processes. Proc Int Astr Union. 2018; 13: 51-57.
  • 17. Zalasiewicz J, Waters CN, Williams M, Summerhayes C, editors. The Anthropocene as a Geological Time Unit: A Guide to the Scientific Evidence and Current Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2019.
  • 18. Allee T, Elsig M. Why do some international institutions contain strong dispute settlement provisions? New evidence from preferential trade agreements. Rev Int Org. 2016; 11: 89-120.
  • 19. Hobern D, Baptiste B, Copas K, Guralnick R, Hahn A, van Huis E, et al. Connecting data and expertise: a new alliance for biodiversity knowledge. Biodiv. Data J. 2019; 7: e33679.
  • 20. Bertelsmann-Scott T, Jansen van Rensburg SJ, Viviers W, Parshotam A, Parry A, Rossouw R, et al. The impact of plurilateral trade agreements on developing countries-to participate or not to participate?. S Afr J Int Affairs.2018; 25: 177-198.
  • 21. Roskov Y., Ower G., Orrell T., Nicolson D., Bailly N., Kirk P.M., et al., eds. (2019). Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life, 2019 Annual Checklist. Digital resource at www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-checklist/ 2019. Species 2000: Naturalis, Leiden, the Netherlands. ISSN 2405-884X
  • 22. Raposo MA, Stopiglia R, Brito GR, Bockmann FA, Kirwan GM, Gayon J, et al. What really hampers taxonomy and conservation? A riposte to Garnett and Christidis (2017). Zootaxa. 2017; 4317: 179-184.
  • 23. Conix S. Radical pluralism, classificatory norms and the legitimacy of species classifications. Studies Hist. Phil. Sci. 2019; 73:27-34.
  • 24. Garnett ST. Smugglers are profiting from our failure to define endangered species. New Sci. 2019; 14 February.
  • 25. Fontaine B, van Achterberg K, Alonso-Zarazaga MA, Araujo R, Asche M, Aspock H, et al. New species in the Old World: Europe as a frontier in biodiversity exploration, a test bed for 21st century taxonomy. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7: e36881. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036881 PMID: 22649502