CONFESSIONAL MODELS OF CHURCH AUTHORITY (PHILOSOPHICAL AND CANONICAL ANALYSIS)

Introduction. Judgments on church authority have been transformed depending on the changing position of the Church in society and its relationship with the state. In the process of rethinking, there have developed special traditions of its understanding, which reflected the specifics of the existence of Christian communities in different cultural and legal conditions. The purpose of the study is to outline the traditions of understanding church authority in three Christian denominations and offer grounds for their comparison in the philosophical and canonical aspect.

Methods. A comparative method is used on the basis of analyzing philosophical literature and canon-legal sources. Scientific novelty of the research. The article for the first time systematizes confessional differences in interpreting the form, content and levels of church authority.

Results. It is shown that the decisive factor determining the differences between confessional traditions in the understanding of church authority is the nature of the boundary between the sacred and government authorities. Catholicism, considering the governmental power established by God, includes it in the sacred, along with the teaching and sacramental. Protestantism, on the contrary, radically opposes it to the sacred, recognizing it as the prerogative of the state. Orthodoxy, as a rule, does not recognize government power as sacred, but it does not separate it from the church.

Conclusions. An analysis of the positions expressed by representatives of various Christian denominations regarding church authority makes it possible for us to conclude that the Orthodox tradition tends to defend a position equidistant from polar opinions.