Published May 24, 2018
| Version v1
Dataset
Open
Supplementary material 3 from: Hagen BL, Kumschick S (2018) The relevance of using various scoring schemes revealed by an impact assessment of feral mammals. NeoBiota 38: 37-75. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.38.23509
Authors/Creators
- 1. Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
- 2. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Claremont, South Africa
Description
Detailed EICAT assessments (Table S3)
: Explanation note: A summary of the impact assessment using the Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT). Impact scores, from highest to lowest are Massive (MV), Major (MR), Moderate (MO), Minor (MN) and Minimal Concern (MC). Full reference details are given in Appendix 2. Region indicates whether the impact was found on islands or the mainland.
Files
Files
(55.1 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:8f90b1b5ec1a2970f02c06963e12a3a8
|
55.1 kB | Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Is supplement to
- 10.3897/neobiota.38.23509 (DOI)