Meloidogyne incognita
Authors/Creators
- 1. Entomology and Plant Pathology, The University of Tennessee, 370 Plant Biotechnology, Building, 2505 E J Chapman Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996 - 4560.
- 2. Pope's Plant Farm, Maryville, TN.
Description
This nematode also is cosmopolitan and probably accounts for more crop loss worldwide than any other species. Despite the importance of M. incognita in agriculture, its pathogenicity on hemp has hardly been examined. Whittle and Drain (1935) were the first to experimentally study this species on hemp, as Heterodera radicicola. Cotton was a good host, but not tobacco or peanut, which identifies this population as M. incognita Race 3 (Taylor and Sasser, 1977). Pogosyan (1960) and Nirula and Kumar (1964) reported M. incognita on C. sativa in Armenia and India, respectively, but did not provide details on hemp type or symptoms. In a study by Kotcon et al. (2018), the fiber cv. ‘Canda’ supported much greater galling and reproduction than did ‘Felina 32’. In recent greenhouse experiments the fiber type ‘Delores’ was a very compatible host for M. incognita Race 3, with numerous galls, egg masses, and high reproduction (up to 1 million eggs/ root system) (Bernard and Chaffin, 2020; Hansen et al., 2020) (Fig. 1). The reproductive factor (RF) was 36‒81. A CBD-dominant cultivar, ‘Wife’, had only a few galls and minor reproduction (Rf = 0.2) (Bernard and Chaffin, 2020). However, the CBD-dominant cultivar ‘Charlotte’s Web’ had a high Rf value (39.6) and other CBD-dominant cultivars ranged from 2.4 to 17.5. Van Biljon (2017) found that most of 10 tested cultivars were tolerant or susceptible to M. incognita Races 2 and 4, but that three of the 10 were resistant to Race 2, including ‘Futura 75’. This cultivar was a good host for M. incognita Race 3 (Bernard and Chaffin, 2020). Clearly there is a wide variation in susceptibility of hemp to M. incognita, both by cultivar and by nematode isolate, which could provide a useful tool for management of this nematode.
Evidence is beginning to appear that M. incognita is a threat to field production of hemp crops. This nematode caused galls on industrial hemp in a North Carolina production field, and although the infection was light it was associated with plant stunting (Thiessen et al., 2020). In Alabama, growth of cultivars ‘Boax’ and ‘Otto2’ was reduced and root systems exhibited galling demonstrated to be caused by M. incognita Race 3. In a subsequent greenhouse test this nematode isolate successfully caused galls and reproduced on ‘Maverick’ hemp, a CBD-dominant cultivar, with an Rf of 2.1 (Lawaju et al., 2021).
The reproduction factor (Rf) is a useful means of estimating the suitability of a host for nematode increase, but comparisons from one study to another must be made cautiously. In the Alabama study of Lawaju et al. (2021), 500-cm 3 pots were used, with an initial inoculum (Pi) of 2,500 eggs; the experiment was run for 45 days and resulted in an Rf of 2.1 on ‘Maverick’. In contrast, Bernard and Chaffin (2020) used 1000-cm 3 pots with a Pi of 5,000 eggs and ran their experiments for 60 days, with an average Rf on ‘Delores’ of 45 and on ‘Wife’ of 0.2. Several other factors prevent a close comparison of the two protocols. The two nematode isolates could have differing virulence on hemp and a priori knowledge of a hemp cultivar’s susceptibility is necessarily unknown, making Rf comparisons difficult. Comparative and cooperative studies are needed to better understand the complexity of root-knot nematode–hemp interactions.
Notes
Files
Files
(3.9 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:f250b571a4a26008652337bd950d8fc4
|
3.9 kB | Download |
System files
(17.7 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:5bb991c1013a25d9aae335441c67f718
|
17.7 kB | Download |
Linked records
Additional details
Identifiers
Biodiversity
- Scientific name authorship
- Kofoid and White
- Kingdom
- Animalia
- Phylum
- Nematoda
- Order
- Rhabditida
- Family
- Meloidogynidae
- Genus
- Meloidogyne
- Species
- incognita
- Taxon rank
- species
References
- Whittle, W. O. and Drain, B. D. 1935. The root-knot nematode in Tennessee. Its prevalence and suggestions for control. University of Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station Circular No. 54.
- Taylor, A. L. and Sasser, J. N. 1977. Biology, identification and control of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) North Carolina State University and USAID.
- Pogosyan, E. E. 1960. Root-knot nematodes in the Armenian SSR. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk Armyanskoi SSR 13: 27 - 34; (In Russian).
- Nirula, K. K. and Kumar, B. 1964. New host records of the root-knot nematodes. Nematologica 10: 184.
- Kotcon, J., Wheeler, K., Cline, R. H. and Carter, S. 2018. Susceptibility and yield loss relationships of Meloidogyne hapla and M. incognita infecting Cannabis sativa. Journal of Nematology 50: 644.
- Bernard, E. C. and Chaffin, A. G. 2020. Hemp cultivar susceptibility to the southern root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita. Journal of Nematology 52: 1 - 2.
- Hansen, Z., Bernard, E., Grant, J., Gwinn, K., Hale, F., Kelly, H. and Stewart, S. 2020. Hemp disease and pest management. University of Tennessee Extension Publication W 916, Available at: https: // extension. tennessee. edu / publications / Documents / W 916. pdf.
- Van Biljon, E. R. 2017. Nematode pests of tobacco and fibre crops. In Fourie, H., Spaull, V. W., Jones, R. K., Daneel, M. S. and De Waele, D. (Eds), Nematology in South Africa: a view from the 21 st Century. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland pp. 285 - 310. https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / 978 - 3 - 319 - 44210 - 5 _ 12.
- Thiessen, L. D., Schappe, T., Cochran, S., Hicks, K. and Post, A. R. 2020. Surveying for potential diseases and abiotic disorders of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa) production. Plant Health Progress 21: 321 - 32.
- Lawaju, B. R., Groover, W., Kelton, J., Conner, K., Sikora, E. and Lawrence, K. S. 2021. First report of Meloidogyne incognita infecting Cannabis sativa in Alabama. Journal of Nematology 53: e 2021 - 52.