Published July 30, 2022 | Version http://impactfactor.org/PDF/IJTPR/12/IJTPR,Vol12,Issue7,Article13.pdf
Journal article Open

A Morphometric Assessment of Foramen Ovale and its Variations in Dry Skulls: An Observational Study

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Santosh Medical College, Santosh Deemed University, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India

Description

Aim: To evaluate the morphometry of foramen ovale and its variations in dry skulls of India. Methodology: This present study was undertaken on 50 dry adult human skulls obtained from Department of Anatomy, Santosh Medical College, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India . The foramen ovale was observed from the extra cranial view of skull base. Skulls with damaged walls of foramen ovale were not considered. The shape of the foramen ovale was noted by direct inspection as per the classification. Accessory foramen and bony growth around the margins of foramen were also noted. Measurements of foramen ovale were taken by placing a pair of divider on antero-posterior length and transverse diameters of the foramen and then carefully transferred to a meter rule for the readings to be taken. Variation in right and left side in length and breadth was also evaluated. Results: A total of 38 skulls were studied. We found most common shape of foramen ovale was of oval type and was present in 52% cases. The shape of foramen ovale was round in 18% cases, almond in 24% cases and D-Shaped in 6% cases. Out of 50 skulls, spines were present in 4 skulls (8%). The maximum length and width of foramen ovale on the right and left side was 8.08 mm, 5.14 mm and 9.98 mm, 5.26 mm respectively. Minimum length and width of foramen ovale on right and left side was 6.04 mm, 2.92 mm and 5.62 mm, 2.16 mm respectively. Mean length on right and left side was 7.10 mm and 7.66 mm and mean width on right and left side was 4.02 mm and 3.83 mm respectively. Conclusion: Knowledge in variations of morphometry of foramen ovale has various clinical, anatomical and surgical importance. The results of this study will provide an in-depth knowledge about the foramen ovale in dry skulls to the anatomists. This knowledge will also be useful to clinicians and surgeons in planning and executing procedures of the skull base in Indian population.

Abstract (English)

Aim: To evaluate the morphometry of foramen ovale and its variations in dry skulls of India. Methodology: This present study was undertaken on 50 dry adult human skulls obtained from Department of Anatomy, Santosh Medical College, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India . The foramen ovale was observed from the extra cranial view of skull base. Skulls with damaged walls of foramen ovale were not considered. The shape of the foramen ovale was noted by direct inspection as per the classification. Accessory foramen and bony growth around the margins of foramen were also noted. Measurements of foramen ovale were taken by placing a pair of divider on antero-posterior length and transverse diameters of the foramen and then carefully transferred to a meter rule for the readings to be taken. Variation in right and left side in length and breadth was also evaluated. Results: A total of 38 skulls were studied. We found most common shape of foramen ovale was of oval type and was present in 52% cases. The shape of foramen ovale was round in 18% cases, almond in 24% cases and D-Shaped in 6% cases. Out of 50 skulls, spines were present in 4 skulls (8%). The maximum length and width of foramen ovale on the right and left side was 8.08 mm, 5.14 mm and 9.98 mm, 5.26 mm respectively. Minimum length and width of foramen ovale on right and left side was 6.04 mm, 2.92 mm and 5.62 mm, 2.16 mm respectively. Mean length on right and left side was 7.10 mm and 7.66 mm and mean width on right and left side was 4.02 mm and 3.83 mm respectively. Conclusion: Knowledge in variations of morphometry of foramen ovale has various clinical, anatomical and surgical importance. The results of this study will provide an in-depth knowledge about the foramen ovale in dry skulls to the anatomists. This knowledge will also be useful to clinicians and surgeons in planning and executing procedures of the skull base in Indian population.

Files

IJTPR,Vol12,Issue7,Article12.pdf

Files (150.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:60236f1ea60bbe266d16cfb3279766a3
150.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Dates

Accepted
2022-06-21

References

  • 1. Gray Henry. Gray's Anatomy of Human Body. 37th. New York and London: Churchill Livingstone; 1989. Osteology. In:Peter L Williams, Warwick, Roger; pp. 267–447. 2. Ray B, Gupta N, Ghose S. Anatomic variations of foramen ovale. Kathmandu University Med J. 2005;(3):64–68. 3. Soames RW. Gray's Anatomy of the Human Body. 38th. Churchill Livingstone; 1995. pp. 425–736. 4. Yanagi S. Developmental studies on the foramen rotundum, foramen ovale and foramen spinosum of the human sphenoid bone. The Hokkaido journal of medical science 1987;62(3):485-496 . 5. Lang J, Maier R, Schafhauser O. Postnatal enlargement of the foramina rotundum, oval et spinosum and their topographical changes. Anatomischer Anzeiger. 1984; 156 (5):351-387. 6. Kapur E, Dilberovic F, Redzepagic S, Berhamovic E. Variation in the lateral plate of the pterygoid process and the lateral subzygomatic approach to the mandibular nerve. Med Arh. 2000;54: 133–137. 7. Palacios E, MacGee E. Radiological diagnosis of trigeminal neurinomas. Journal of Neurosurgeries. 1972:153–56. 8. Patel R, Mehta CD () Morphometry of Foramen Ovale 2670 at base of skull in Gujarat IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2014;13(6): 26-30. 9. Daimi SR, Siddiqui AU, Gill SS (2011) Analysis of foramen ovale with special emphasis on pterygoalar bar and pterygoalar foramen Folia Morphol. 2011;70(3):149–153. 10. Wieser HG, Siegel AM: Analysis of foramen ovale electrode-recorded seizures and correlation with outcome following amygdalohippocampectomy. Epilepsia 32: 838-850, 1991 11. Gerber AM: Improved visualization of the foramen ovale for percutaneous approaches to the gasserian ganglion: Technical note. J Neurosurg 80: 156-159, 1994 12. Gusmão S, Oliveira M, Tazinaffo U, Honey CR: Percutaneous trigeminal nerve radiofrequency rhizotomy guided by computerized tomography fluoroscopy: Technical note. J Neurosurg 99: 785–786, 2003 13. Sindou M, Chavez JM, Saint PG: Percutaneous biopsy of cavernous sinus tumours through the foramen ovale. Neurosurgery 40: 106-111, 1997 14. Dresel SH, Mackey JK, Lufkin RB: Meckel cave lesions: Percutaneous fine needle-aspiration biopsy cytology. Radiology 179: 579-582, 1991 15. Barakos JA, Dillon WP: Lesions of the foramen ovale: CT-guided fine-needle aspiration. Radiology 182: 573-575, 1992. 16. Ray B, Gupta N, Ghose S. Anatomic variations of foramen ovale. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2005;3(1):64–68 17. Lang J, Maier R, Schafhauser O. [Postnatal enlargement of the foramina rotundum, ovaleetspinosum and their topographical changes]. AnatAnz 1984;156(5):351–387 18. Hwang SH, Lee MK, Park JW, Lee JE, Cho CW, Kim DJ. A morphometric analysis of the foramen ovale and the zygomatic points determined by a computed tomography in patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. J Korean NeurosurgSoc 2005;38:202–205 19. Somesh MS, Sridevi HB, Prabhu LV, et al. A morphometric study of foramen ovale. Turk Neurosurg 2011;21(3):378–383 20. Wadhwa A, Sharma M, Kaur P. Anatomic variations of foramen ovale – clinical implications. International Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences 2012;2:21– 24 21. Khan AA, Asari MA, Hassan A. Anatomic variants of foramen ovale and spinosum in human skulls. A. Int. J. Morphol. 2012;30:445–449 22. Saran RS, Ananthi KS, Subramaniam A, Balaji MT, Vinaitha D, Vaithianathan G. Foramen of Civinini: a new anatomical guide for maxillofacial surgeons. J ClinDiagn Res 2013;7(7):1271–1275 23. Tubbs RS, May WR Jr, Apaydin N, et al. Ossification of ligaments near the foramen ovale: an anatomic study with potential clinical significance regarding transcutaneous approaches to the skull base. Neurosurgery 2009;65(6, Suppl):60– 64, discussion 64 24. Reymond J, Charuta A, Wysocki J. The morphology and morphometry of the foramina of the greater wing of the human sphenoid bone. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2005;64(3):188–193.