Chemical Weed Control in Eggplant with Pendimethalin
Authors/Creators
- 1. Department of Agronomy, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria.
- 2. Department of Soil and Land Resource Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Dennis Osadebay University, Asaba, Delta State, Nigeria.
- 3. Department of Crop Science, Dennis Osadebay University, Anwai, Asaba, Delta State, Nigeria.
Description
Abstract
Weed interference reduces garden egg productivity. Most farmers adopt highly labor-intensive and expensive manual weeding. Employing herbicides reduces manual labor requirements but herbicides known for garden egg productivity are few. The main objectives of the experiment are to assess the weed control usefulness of pendimethalin in garden egg production and assess the concentration effect on herbicide efficacy. Treatments involved were pendimethalin application at 1.0 and 2.0 kg a.i./ha, hand-weeded and un-weeded controls. Weed biomass, weed control efficacy (WCE) and garden egg yields were evaluated. Biomass of weed was significantly lower in pots that received pendimethalin at 2.0 kg a.i./ha (7.2) than at 1.0 kg a.i./ha (13.9 g/pot), while hand-weeded and un-weeded had 0.0 and 42.6 g/pot, respectively. Weed Control Efficacy was in the order of 100.0 (hand-weeded control)> 83.2 (pendimethalin 2.0kg a.i./ha) > 67.4 (pendimethalin 1.0kg a.i./ha) > 0.0% (un-weeded). Higher herbicide concentration gave better weed control and garden egg yield than the lower concentration. Garden egg yields were in the order of 138.9 (Hand weeded) > 104.2 (Pendimethalin 2.0kg a.i./ha) > 50.6 (Pendimethalin 1.0kg a.i./ha) > 32.3 g/plant (Un-weeded). Pendimethalin (2.0kg a.i./ha) significantly reduced weed biomass in garden egg pots with 83.2% WCE and 75.0% garden egg yield relative to hand-weeded controls therefore should be among the herbicides considered for weed control in garden egg productivity.
Files
chemrj-2024-09-02-95-102.pdf
Files
(314.2 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:654d740316cd59b75253a0f6266358a0
|
314.2 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- [1]. Adeyemi OR, &Olaniyi SM. 2008. Critical period for weed removal in eggplant (Solanum incanum). Nigerian Journal of Horticultural Science 13: 82 – 91.
- [2]. Alama IS, Akparobi SO, Emuh FN, & Egbuchua CN. 2019. Comparison of Selected Physico-Chemical Properties of Upland and Swampland Soils in the Tropical Rainforest of Delta State, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Food Environment 6 (1): 53-59.
- [3]. Alama SI, Egbuchua CN, Emuh FN, & Akparobi SO. 2021. Physiochemical and pedological features of swampland soils and productive potentials within a coastal system in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. International Journal of Bioscience.13 (2): 1-9.
- [4]. http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/4.12.1-8.
- [5]. Aliyu L, & Lagoke STO. 1995. Evaluation of herbicides for weed control in Solanum aethiopicum L. (Scarlet eggplant) at Samaru, Nigeria. Crop Protection. 14 (96): 479-481.
- [6]. Almhemed K, &Ustuner T. 2022. Assessment of some weed control methods efficacy and yield losses caused by weed in eggplant. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin. 31(08): 7514-7520.
- [7]. Bergley JA. 2009. Characterization of African Eggplants species and origin. Journal of plant origin and distribution. 10(4):262-272.
- [8]. Dalziel JM. 1937. The useful plants of west tropical Africa. The Crown Agents for the Colonies, London.
- [9]. DOI:10.4314/njhs.v13i1.46575
- [10]. Eze SO, &Kanu CQ. 2014. Phytochemical and nutritive composition analysis of Solanum spp. L.J. Pharmaceutical Science Innovation. 3(4):358-362.
- [11]. Guiama VD, Libouga DG, Ngah E, Beeka KC, Ndi B, Maloga JM, Bindzi P, Donn P, & Mbofung CM. 2010. Milk –clothing potential of fruit extract from Solanum esculentum, Solanum arcrocarpon L. and Solanum melongena. African Journal of Biotechnology. 9(12): 1797-1802.
- [12]. http://www.ajol.info/index.php/naj
- [13]. Idio AD & Adinya IB. 2017. Analysis of different rates of N.P.K. (15:15:15) fertilizer on yield of eggplant (Solanum melongena) in Cross River University of Technology Teaching and Research Farm, Obubra Campus, Cross River State, Nigeria. Net Journal of Agricultural Science. 5(4):121-125.
- [14]. Jordan D, Burns A, & Barnes J. 1994. Rice weed control research in northeast lousiana. La. Agricultural Experimental Station, St. Joseph, LA.
- [15]. Mishra BB, Gautam S, & Sharma A. 2012. Browning of fresh-cut eggplant: Impact of cutting and storage. Postharvest Biology and Technology 67:44-51.
- [16]. Noda Y, Kneyuki T, Igarashi K, Mori A, & Packer L. 2000. Antioxidant activity of nasunin, an anthocyanin in eggplant peels. Toxicology. 148(2-3):119-123.
- [17]. Nuevo PA, Resorez JM, Maunahan MV, & Masilungan GD. 2020. Control of Browning in Fresh-Cut Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) Using Different Anti-Browning Agents. Philippine Journal of Crop Science. 45(1):62-67.
- [18]. Nwokwu GN, Ogbonna LC, & Egwu PN. 2020. Effect of NPK fertilizer rates on growth and yield components of eggplant (Solanum melongena) cultivars. Nigerian Agricultural Journal. 51 (2) 530-537.
- [19]. Obiazi CC. 2022. Impact of hoe weeding levels on maize and cassava yields in an intercrop. International Journal of Phytology Research. 2(3):24-29.
- [20]. Obiazi CC. (1991). Cassava production and utilization in Nigeria: Problems and prospects. Abraka Journal of Agriculture. 1(1): 111 - 121.
- [21]. Obiazi CC, & Ojobor SA. (2013). Production challenges of cassava and prospects. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare. 3(14), 31-35.
- [22]. Obiazi CC, Tijani-Eniola H, & Olaniyi O. W. 2020. Field evaluation of pre-emergence application of selected herbicides for okra tolerance and growth in Asaba, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development. 10 (1): 149-159.
- [23]. Omovbude S, & Ikenwa OW. 2020. The performance of two varieties of garden egg (Solanum melongena L.) as influenced by weed control methods in Southeastern Nigeria. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 28 (3): 150-159.
- [24]. Oniah MO, Adinya IB, Kekong MA, Ogar EA, & Afu SM. 2010. Profitability analysis in eggplant fruits production in Cross River State. Nig South East J Agric Econ Extens, 9(1&2): 46-50.