Published October 30, 2023 | Version https://impactfactor.org/PDF/IJPCR/15/IJPCR,Vol15,Issue10,Article147.pdf
Journal article Open

To Assess the Acceptability, Safety, Efficacy, Continuation Rate and Rate of Expulsion of PPIUCD Insertion

  • 1. Senior Resident, Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, BMGMC, Shahdol, M.P.
  • 2. OBG Consultant, OBG Consultant, Bihan Nursing Home, Shakti

Description

Background & Methods: The aim of the study is to assess the acceptability, safety, efficacy, continuation rate and rate of expulsion of PPIUCD insertion. After taking informed consent.In vaginal delivery. Bimanual exam was performed to evaluate the cervix and the uterus after the delivery of the placenta and ensured empty cavity with contracted uterus and evaluation of postpartum hemorrhage. Results: Out of 255 patients, 230 (90.19%) came for 1st followup, 25 (9.8%) patients lost followup during 1st followup at 6 week. Out of 230 patients 19 (8.26%) patients excluded from study due to removal of PPIUCD after 1st followup at 6 weeks and 1 (0.4%) patient excluded from study after 1st follouwp due to expulsion of PPIUCD. During 2nd followup at 6 months, out of 210 patients, 180 (86%) patients came for 2nd followup at 6 months. 30 (14.3%) patients lost to followup during 2nd followup. Out of 180 patients, 15 (8.3%) patients excluded from study due to removal of PPIUCD after 2nd followup and 1(0.5%) excluded from study after 2nd followup due to expulsion of PPIUCD. Conclusion: PPIUCD is one of the best contraceptive method because it is easy to apply, cheap and easily available and patients are highly motivated at postpartum period though expulsion rate was 1% still the result can be improved the motivating the women by periodic checkup of IUCD. Acceptance rate is poor. It can be improved by motivating the patient during antenatal period and counselling. This could be attributed to the fact that many women were unaware and to be informed about the benefits of PPIUCD only when they were admitted for delivery. Also the refusal of family members for PPIUD usage adds the burdens of refusing contraception.

 

 

 

Abstract (English)

Background & Methods: The aim of the study is to assess the acceptability, safety, efficacy, continuation rate and rate of expulsion of PPIUCD insertion. After taking informed consent.In vaginal delivery. Bimanual exam was performed to evaluate the cervix and the uterus after the delivery of the placenta and ensured empty cavity with contracted uterus and evaluation of postpartum hemorrhage. Results: Out of 255 patients, 230 (90.19%) came for 1st followup, 25 (9.8%) patients lost followup during 1st followup at 6 week. Out of 230 patients 19 (8.26%) patients excluded from study due to removal of PPIUCD after 1st followup at 6 weeks and 1 (0.4%) patient excluded from study after 1st follouwp due to expulsion of PPIUCD. During 2nd followup at 6 months, out of 210 patients, 180 (86%) patients came for 2nd followup at 6 months. 30 (14.3%) patients lost to followup during 2nd followup. Out of 180 patients, 15 (8.3%) patients excluded from study due to removal of PPIUCD after 2nd followup and 1(0.5%) excluded from study after 2nd followup due to expulsion of PPIUCD. Conclusion: PPIUCD is one of the best contraceptive method because it is easy to apply, cheap and easily available and patients are highly motivated at postpartum period though expulsion rate was 1% still the result can be improved the motivating the women by periodic checkup of IUCD. Acceptance rate is poor. It can be improved by motivating the patient during antenatal period and counselling. This could be attributed to the fact that many women were unaware and to be informed about the benefits of PPIUCD only when they were admitted for delivery. Also the refusal of family members for PPIUD usage adds the burdens of refusing contraception.

 

 

 

Files

IJPCR,Vol15,Issue10,Article147.pdf

Files (317.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0d77e54f1b2c400515d43a7a9ec1ad23
317.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Dates

Accepted
2023-10-26

References

  • 1. Post-partum IUD reference manual. New Delhi: Family Planning Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, 2010. 2. Mishra Sujnanendra, Evaluation of Safety, Efficacy, and Expulsion of Post-Placental and Intra-Cesarean Insertion of Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices (PPIUCD). The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India. September–October 2014; 64(5):337–343. 3. S. Subathra Devi, Study on PPIUCD acceptors and their followup. 2017, The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Government Theni Medical College, Theni, April 2017. 4. Veldhuis HM, Vos AG, Lagro-Janssen AL. Complications of the intrauterine device in nulliparous and parous women. Eur J Gen Pract. 2004 Sep;10(3):82-7. 5. Cole LP, Edelman DA, Potts DM, Wheeler RG, Laufe LE. Postpartum insertion of modified intrauterine devices; J Reprod Med. 1984 Sep;29(9):677-82. 6. Laila Shah. Institutionalization of PPIUCD insertion, 2013 [Internet]. National Committee for Maternal and Neonatal Health. Available from:http://www.k4health.org. Accessed on May 18, 2014. 7. Monica Soni, Post-placental postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices insertion: our scenario DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.18203/2320- 1770.ijrcog20160581. 8. Runjun Doley. A retrospective study of acceptability and complications of PPIUCD insertion Evolution Med. Dent. Sci. 2016;5(31): 1631-1634. 9. Sahaja Kittur, Enhancing contraceptive usage by post-placental intrauterine contraceptive devices (PPIUCD) insertion with evaluation of safety, efficacy, and expulsion. DOI: 10.5455/2320- 1770.ijrcog001112. 10. Somesh Kumar, Women's experience with postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device use in India, http://www.reproductive-health journal.com/content/11/1/3. 11. Shrivastava S, Bano I. Acceptability of PPIUCD versus interval IUCD insertion. Int J Sci Res 2016 Aug;5(8):364-67. 12. Sudha T.R. Banapurmath et al, Feasibility of postpartum insertion of Intrauterine contraceptive device- Expanding the use of IUCD in post-partum period- A cross sectional study in India. Int J Cur Res Rev, July 2014; 06(14).