Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published February 11, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Climatic niche, natural history, and conservation status of the Porthole Treefrog, Charadrahyla taeniopus (Günther, 1901) (Anura: Hylidae) in Mexico

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Museo de Zoología "Alfonso L. Herrera", Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). A.P. 70-399, Ciudad de México CP 04510, MÉXICO
  • 2. Laboratorio de Ecología de Poblaciones, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Instituto de Ciencias Básicas e Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Km 4.5 carretera Pachuca-Tulancingo, 42184, Mineral de La Reforma, Hidalgo, MÉXICO
  • 3. Programa Educativo de Ingeniería en Biotecnología. Universidad Politécnica de Quintana Roo. Av. Arco Bicentenario, M 11, Lote 1119-33, Sm 255, 77500 Cancún, Quintana Roo, MÉXICO
  • 4. Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-153, 04510 Ciudad de México, MÉXICO

Description

Cruz-Elizalde, Raciel, Magno-Benítez, Itzel, Berriozabal-Islas, Christian, Ortíz-Pulido, Raúl, Ramírez-Bautista, Aurelio, Hernández-Austria, Raquel (2020): Climatic niche, natural history, and conservation status of the Porthole Treefrog, Charadrahyla taeniopus (Günther, 1901) (Anura: Hylidae) in Mexico. Amphibian & Reptile Conservation (e219) 14 (1): 10-21, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11263095

Files

source.pdf

Files (2.6 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:70855de832c035b6636eec4b054e6371
2.6 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

URL
https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/296754
LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FF85FFE8FFC0FFB6636EEC4B054E6371
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF85FFE8FFC0FFB6636EEC4B054E6371

Has part
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.11263107 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BC8790FFC3FFB16079E953001362F4 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.11263101 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.11263105 (DOI)
Dataset: 10.5281/zenodo.15135752 (DOI)
Dataset: 10.5281/zenodo.15135754 (DOI)
Is source of
Dataset: https://www.gbif.org/dataset/bace6e3d-2009-4576-a215-17a83e8c924b (URL)

References

  • Becker CG, Fonseca CR, Haddad CFB, Batista RF, Prado PI. 2007. Habitat split and the global decline of amphibians. Science 318: 1,775-1,777.
  • Biavati GM, Wiederhecker HC, Colli GR. 2004. Diet of Epipedobates flavopictus (Anura: Dendrobatidae) in a Neotropical savanna. Journal of Herpetology 38: 510-518.
  • Byrne PG, Roberts JD, Simmons LW. 2002. Sperm competition selects for increased testes mass in Australian frogs. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 347-355.
  • Campbell JA, Blancas-Hernandez JC, Smith EN. 2009. A new species of stream-breeding treefrog of the genus Charadrahyla (Hylidae) from the Sierra Madre del Sur of Guerrero, Mexico. Copeia 2009: 287-295.
  • Campos-Rodriguez JI, Soto-Galera E, Paulo-Maya J, Serna-Hernandez JA. 2012. Nuevas localidades y descripcion del habitat de la rana Lithobates johni, especie endemica en peligro de extincion. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 83: 566-568.
  • Canseco-Marquez L, Ramirez-Gonzalez CG, Gonzalez-Bernal E. 2017. Discovery of another new species of Charadrahyla (Anura, Hylidae) from the cloud forest of northern Oaxaca, Mexico. Zootaxa 4329: 64-72.
  • Caviedes-Solis IW, Vazquez-Vega LF, Solano-Zavaleta I, Perez-Ramos E, Rovito SM, Devitt TJ, Heimes P, Flores-Villela OA, Campbell JA, Nieto Montes de Oca A. 2015. Everything is not lost: recent records, rediscoveries, and range extensions of Mexican hylid frogs. Mesoamerican Herpetology 2: 230-241.
  • Cruz-Elizalde R, Ramirez-Bautista A, Wilson LD, Hernandez-Salinas U. 2015. Effectiveness of protected areas in herpetofaunal conservation in Hidalgo, Mexico. Herpetological Journal 25: 41-48.
  • Cruz-Elizalde R, Berriozabal-Islas C, Hernandez-Salinas U, Martinez-Morales MA, Ramirez-Bautista A. 2016. Amphibian species richness and diversity in a modified tropical environment of central Mexico. Tropical Ecology 57: 407-417.
  • da Silva HR, de Britto-Pereira MC. 2006. How much fruit do fruit-eating frogs eat? An investigation on the diet of Xenohyla truncata (Lissamphibia: Anura: Hylidae). Journal of Zoology 270: 692-698.
  • Dambach J, Rodder D. 2011. Applications and future challenges in marine species distribution modeling. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 21: 92-100.
  • Delia JR, Whitney JL, Burkhardt T. 2013. Rediscovery of 'lost' treefrogs from the Oaxacan highlands of Mexico. Biodiversity Conservation 22: 1,405-1,414.
  • DOF (Diario Oficial). 2010. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010. Proteccion Ambiental-Especies Nativas de Mexico de Flora y Fauna Silvestres-Categorias de Riesgo y Especificaciones para su Inclusion, Exclusion o Cambio-Lista de Especies en Riesgo. Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Mexico, DF, Mexico. 77 p.
  • Duellman WE. 2001. The Hylid Frogs of Middle America. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Ithaca, New York, USA and University of Kansas, Museum of Natural History, Lawrence, Kansas, USA. 1,250 p.
  • Dure MI, Kehr AI. 2004. Influence of microhabitat on the trophic ecology of two leptodactylids from northeastern Argentina. Herpetologica 60: 295-303.
  • Dure MI, Kehr AI, Schaefer EF. 2009. Niche overlap and resource partitioning among five sympatric bufonids (Anura, Bufonidae) from northeastern Argentina. Phyllomedusa 8: 27-39.
  • Evans M, Lampo M. 1996. Diet of Bufo marinus in Venezuela. Journal of Herpetology 30: 73-76.
  • Faivovich J, Haddad CFB, Garcia PCA, Frost DR, Campbell JA, Wheeler WC. 2005. Systematic review of the frog family Hylidae, with special reference to Hylinae: a phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 294: 1-240.
  • Fisher MC, Garner TWJ, Walker SF. 2009. Global emergence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and amphibian chytridiomycosis in space, time, and host. Annual Review of Microbiology 63: 291-310.
  • Flores-Villela O, Canseco-Marquez L, Ochoa-Ochoa LM. 2010. Geographic distribution and conservation of the Mexican central highlands herpetofauna. Pp. 303-321 In: Conservation of the Mesoamerican Amphibians and Reptiles. Editors, Wilson LD, Townsend JH, Johnson JD. Eagle Mountain Publishing, Eagle Mountain, Utah, USA. xvii + 812 p.
  • Frost DR. 2019. Amphibian Species of the World: An Online Reference. Version 6.0 (7 December 2019). American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, USA. Available: http://www. research.amnh. org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html [Accessed: 1 December 2019].
  • Gadsden HE, Palacios-Orona LE. 1997. Seasonal dietary patterns of the Mexican fringe-toed lizard (Uma paraphygas). Journal of Herpetology 31: 1-9.
  • Gross SJ, Price TD. 2000. Determinants of the northern and southern range limits of a warbler. Journal of Biogeography 27: 869-878.
  • Gutierrez E, Trejo I. 2014. Efecto del cambio climatico en la distribucion potencial de cinco especies arboreas de bosque templado en Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 85: 179-188.
  • Hartmann MT, Hartmann PA, Haddad CFB. 2010. Reproductive modes and fecundity of an assemblage of anuran amphibians in the Atlantic rainforest, Brazil. Iheringia Serie Zoologia 100: 207-215.
  • Hernandez-Austria R. 2017. Estudio sobre la infeccion por el hongo Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis en cinco especies de anuros del estado de Hidalgo, Mexico. M.Sc. Thesis, Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Pachuca de Soto, Hidalgo, Mexico. 63 p.
  • Hernandez-Austria R, Lara-Tufino D, Ramirez-Bautista A. 2015. Estado actual de la distribucion y aspectos ecologicos generales de la rana de Moore Lithobates johni (Anura: Ranidae), endemica de Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 86: 269-271.
  • Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. 2005. Very high-resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25: 1,965-1,978.
  • Hurlbert HS. 1978. The measurement of niche overlap and some relatives. Ecology 59: 67-77.
  • IUCN. 2019. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016-3. Available: http://www.iucnredlist.org [Accessed: 15 December 2019].
  • Jimenez-Arcos VH, Calzada-Arciniega RA, Alfaro-Juantorena LA, Vazquez-Reyes LD, Blair C, Parra-Olea G. 2019. A new species of Charadrahyla (Anura: Hylidae)from the cloud forestof western Oaxaca, Mexico. Zootaxa 4554: 371-385.
  • Johnson JD, Mata-Silva V, Garcia-Padilla E, Wilson LD. 2015. The herpetofauna of Chiapas, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation. Mesoamerican Herpetology 2: 272-329.
  • Johnson JD, Wilson LD, Mata-Silva V, Garcia-Padilla E, DeSantis DL. 2017. The endemic herpetofauna of Mexico: organisms of global significance in severe peril. Mesoamerican Herpetology 4: 544-620.
  • Jorgensen CB. 1992. Growth and reproduction. Pp. 439- 466 In: Environmental Physiology of the Amphibians. Editors, Feder ME, Burggren WW. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 472 p.
  • Kaplan M, Heimes P. 2015. The tadpole of the Mexican Tree Frog Charadrahyla taeniopus (Anura: Hylidae). Caldasia 37: 393-396.
  • Kupfer A. 2007. Sexual size dimorphism in amphibians: an overview.Pp. 50-59 In: Sex, Size, and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism. Editors, Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Szekely T. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. 266 p.
  • Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR, Gadsden-Esparza H, Valdez-Lares R, Woolrich-Pina GA. 2018a. Amphibians and reptiles of the state of Durango, Mexico, with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 748: 65-87.
  • Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR, Woolrich-Pina GA. 2018b. Amphibians and reptiles of the state of San Luis Potosi, Mexico, with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 753: 83-106.
  • Lips KR, Reeve J, Witters LR. 2003. Ecological factors predicting amphibian population declines in Central America. Conservation Biology 17: 1,078-1,088.
  • Lips KR, Mendelson III JR, Munoz-Alonso A, Canseco-Marquez L, Mulcahy DG. 2004.Amphibian population declines in montane southern Mexico: resurveys of historical localities. Biological Conservation 119: 555-564.
  • Luria-Manzano R. 2012. Ecologia trofica del ensamble de anuros riparios de San Sebastian Tlacotepec, Sierra Negra de Puebla, Mexico. M.Sc. Thesis, Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Pachuca de Soto, Hidalgo, Mexico. 75 p.
  • Mata-Silva V, Johnson JD, Wilson LD, Garcia-Padilla E. 2015. The herpetofauna of Oaxaca, Mexico: composition, physiographic distribution, and conservation status. Mesoamerican Herpetology 2: 5-62.
  • Mendoza-Almeralla C, Burrowes P, Parra-Olea G. 2015. La quitridiomicosis en los anfibios de Mexico: una revision. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 86: 238-248.
  • Mendoza-Almeralla C, Lopez-Velazquez A, Longo AV, Parra-Olea G. 2016. Temperature treatments boost subclinical infections of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in a Mexican salamander (Pseudoeurycea leprosa). Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 87: 171-179.
  • Merow C, Smith MJ, Silander JA. 2013.A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species' distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography 36: 1,058-1,069.
  • Murrieta-Galindo R, Gonzalez-Romero A, Lopez-Barrera F, Parra-Olea G. 2013. Coffee agrosystems: an important refuge for amphibians in central Veracruz, Mexico. Agroforestry Systems 87: 767-779.
  • Murrieta-Galindo R, Parra-Olea G, Gonzalez-Romero A, Lopez-Barrera F, Vredenburg VT. 2014. Detection of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in amphibians inhabiting cloud forests and coffee agroecosystems in central Veracruz, Mexico. European Journal Wildlife Research 60: 431-439.
  • Navas CA. 2006. Patterns of distribution of anurans in high Andean tropical elevations: insights from integrating biogeography and evolutionary physiology. Integrative and Comparative Biology 46: 82-91.
  • Ochoa-Ochoa L, Urbina-Cardona JN, Vazquez LB, Flores-Villela O, Bezaury-Creel J. 2009. The effects of governmental protected areas and social initiatives for land protection on the conservation of Mexican amphibians. PLoS ONE 4: e6878.
  • Parra-Olea G, Flores-Villela O, Mendoza-Armella C. 2014. Biodiversidad de anfibios en Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 85: 460-466.
  • Phillips SJ, Dudik M. 2008. Modeling of species distributions with MaxEnt: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31: 161-175.
  • Pianka ER. 1986. Ecology and Natural History of Desert Lizards. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA. 222 p.
  • Pineda E, Halffter G. 2004. Species diversity and habitat fragmentation: frogs in a tropical montane landscape in Mexico. Biological Conservation 117: 499-508.
  • Pineda E, Moreno C, Escobar F, Halffter G. 2005. Frog, bat, and dung beetle diversity in the cloud forest and coffee agroecosystems of Veracruz, Mexico. Conservation Biology 19: 400-410.
  • Ponce-Reyes R, Reynoso-Rosales VH, Watson JEM, VanDerWal J, Fuller RA, Pressey RL, Possingham HP. 2012. Vulnerability of cloud forest reserves in Mexico to climate change. Nature Climate Change 2: 448-452.
  • Prado CPA, Haddad CFB. 2005. Size-fecundity relationships and reproductive investment in female frogs in the Pantanal, south-western Brazil. Herpetological Journal 15: 181-189.
  • Ramirez-Bautista A, Lemos-Espinal JA. 2004. Diets of two syntopic populations of frogs, Rana vaillanti and Rana brownorum, from a tropical rain forest in southern Veracruz, Mexico. The Southwestern Naturalist 49: 316-320.
  • Roxburgh SH, Shea K, Wilson JB. 2004. The intermediate disturbance hypothesis: patch dynamics and mechanisms of species coexistence. Ecology 85: 359-371.
  • Santos-Barrera G, Urbina-Cardona N. 2011. The role of the matrix-edge dynamics of amphibian conservation in tropical montane fragmented landscapes. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 82: 679-687.
  • Selby SM. 1965. CRC Standard Mathematical Tables. Chemical Rubber Company, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. 632 p.
  • Suazo-Ortuno I, Alvarado-Diaz J, Raya-Lemus E, Martinez-Ramos M. 2007. Diet of the Mexican Marbled Toad (Bufo marmoreus) in conserved and disturbed tropical dry forest. The Southwestern Naturalist 52: 305-309.
  • Toledo LF, Becker CG, Haddad CFB, Zamudio KR. 2014. Rarity as an indicator of endangerment in neotropical frogs. Biological Conservation 179: 54-62.
  • Urbina-Cardona JN, Flores-Villela O. 2010. Ecological niche modeling and prioritization of conservation-area networks for Mexican herpetofauna. Conservation Biology 24: 1,031-1,041.
  • Varela S, Anderson RP, Garcia-Valdes R, Fernandez-Gonzalez F. 2014. Environmental filters reduce the effects of sampling bias and improve predictions of ecological niche models. Ecography 37: 1,084-1,091.
  • Vitt LJ, Caldwell JP. 2009. Herpetology: an Introductory Biology of Amphibians and Reptiles. 3rd Edition. Academic Press, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA. 720 p.
  • Watters JL, Cummings ST, Flanagan RL, Siler CD. 2016. Review of morphometric measurements used in anuran species descriptions and recommendations for a standardized approach. Zootaxa 4072: 477-495.
  • Wells KD. 2007. The Ecology and Behavior of Amphibians. The University of Chicago, Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 1,400 p.
  • Wiens JJ, Graham CH, Moen DS, Smith SA, Reeder TW. 2006. Evolutionary and ecological causes of the latitudinal diversity gradient in hylid frogs: treefrog trees unearth the roots of high tropical diversity. American Naturalist 168: 579-596.
  • Wilson LD, Johnson JD, Mata-Silva V. 2013. A conservation reassessment of the amphibians of