Outcomes and Complications of Arthroscopic Meniscectomy: A Systematic Analysis of the Success Rates, Functional Outcomes, and Potential Complications Associated with Arthroscopic Meniscectomy for Meniscus Tears: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Authors/Creators
- 1. Senior Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Bhagalpur
- 2. Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Bhagalpur
Description
Background: For meniscus injuries, arthroscopic meniscectomy surgery is frequently used. Its therapeutic utility has been established, but more extensive real-world evidence is needed to confirm its pain-relieving and joint-improving efficacy. Methods: About 25 patients with verified meniscus tears were included in this retrospective cohort analysis, in which we analysed the results and complications of arthroscopic meniscectomy. Data on patients’ demographics, preoperative symptoms, surgical procedures, intraoperative results, and aftercare were compiled and analysed. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was used to evaluate the success rates regarding pain reduction and improved joint function, functional recovery, and complications. Results: High rates of success after arthroscopic meniscectomy were found in the study, which is encouraging. Eighty-five per cent of patients reported decreased pain, and 78 per cent said enhanced joint mobility. And 70% of people returned to doing all they did before their injuries. Average KOOS scores rose by 24 points. Postoperative pain was reported in 10% of patients, minor joint stiffness in 7.2%, and one occurrence of more profound vein thrombosis in 0.4%. Conclusion: Clinical evidence supports the use of arthroscopic meniscectomy to treat meniscus tears, which results in decreased discomfort and enhanced joint function. These results indicate that it should be used indefinitely as a therapeutic measure. Complications highlight the significance of cautious selection of patients and surgical procedures. This study adds to the body of evidence from real-world settings, supporting the clinical efficacy of the technique while also stressing the need for continuous research to improve patient outcomes further.
Abstract (English)
Background: For meniscus injuries, arthroscopic meniscectomy surgery is frequently used. Its therapeutic utility has been established, but more extensive real-world evidence is needed to confirm its pain-relieving and joint-improving efficacy. Methods: About 25 patients with verified meniscus tears were included in this retrospective cohort analysis, in which we analysed the results and complications of arthroscopic meniscectomy. Data on patients’ demographics, preoperative symptoms, surgical procedures, intraoperative results, and aftercare were compiled and analysed. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was used to evaluate the success rates regarding pain reduction and improved joint function, functional recovery, and complications. Results: High rates of success after arthroscopic meniscectomy were found in the study, which is encouraging. Eighty-five per cent of patients reported decreased pain, and 78 per cent said enhanced joint mobility. And 70% of people returned to doing all they did before their injuries. Average KOOS scores rose by 24 points. Postoperative pain was reported in 10% of patients, minor joint stiffness in 7.2%, and one occurrence of more profound vein thrombosis in 0.4%. Conclusion: Clinical evidence supports the use of arthroscopic meniscectomy to treat meniscus tears, which results in decreased discomfort and enhanced joint function. These results indicate that it should be used indefinitely as a therapeutic measure. Complications highlight the significance of cautious selection of patients and surgical procedures. This study adds to the body of evidence from real-world settings, supporting the clinical efficacy of the technique while also stressing the need for continuous research to improve patient outcomes further.
Files
IJPCR,Vol15,Issue10,Article11.pdf
Files
(455.3 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:1652f60ac9cc4be29b2bb895f30d07b1
|
455.3 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Dates
- Accepted
-
2023-09-30
Software
- Repository URL
- https://impactfactor.org/PDF/IJPCR/15/IJPCR,Vol15,Issue10,Article11.pdf
- Development Status
- Active
References
- 1. J. Li, W. Zhu, X. Gao, and X. Li, Comparison of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy to physical therapy following degenerative meniscus tears: A systematic review and metaanalysis, Bio Med Research International, 2020; 1–9. 2. T. R. Liebs, Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy vs physical therapy for Nonobstructive meniscal tears, JAMA, 2019; 321(8):805. 3. V. A. van de Graaf, N. W. Willigenburg, and R. W. Poolman, Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy vs physical therapy for nonobstructive meniscal tears—reply, JAMA, 2019; 321(8): 806, 2019. 4. J. B. Thorlund, Critically appraised paper: Physical therapy was noninferior to partial meniscectomy for improving knee function in patients with non-obstructive meniscal tears [commentary], Journal of Physiotherapy, 2020; 66(4): 269. 5. F. W. Roemer, Editorial commentary: Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy outcomes are worse in patients with concomitant pathology, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2022; 38(3): 945–947. 6. K. O. Plancher, K. Briggs, and S. Petterson, Repair of lateral meniscus tears in ACLR ensures low rate of OA compared to meniscectomy at Nine Years, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2021;37:1. 7. J. A. Godin, M. Cinque, W. Replogle, and E. Stiefel, Partial meniscectomy yields increased patient-reported outcomes: Results from a global database, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2019; 35: 12. 8. F. Boric-Persson, A. Turkiewicz, P. Neuman, and M. Englund, Sick leave after arthroscopic meniscus repair vs. arthroscopic partial meniscectomy, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open, 2023; 5(1): 100340. 9. O.-J. Kwon et al., There is no difference in radiographic outcomes after average 9 years after arthroscopic partial medial meniscectomy for both posterior horn tears and posterior horn root tears, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2020; 36(2): 524–532. 10. Çataltape and K. Öznam, The effect of a single dose of intravenous tranexamic acid on visual clarity in knee arthroscopic meniscectomy without a tourniquet, Journal of Surgery and Medicine, 2023; 7(5): 329–333. 11. L. Engebretsen and G. Moatshe, Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for degenerative meniscus tears in middle-aged patients: Why surgeons should change their approach, British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2020; 54(22): 1311–1312. 12. H. Chen, L. Liu, and Y. Zhang, Finite element analysis of the knee joint stress after partial meniscectomy for meniscus horizontal cleavage tears, 2023. 13. N. Askew, L. Nherera, and R. Searle, EE473 cost-effectiveness of meniscus repair compared with partial meniscectomy for horizontal cleavage meniscus tears, Value in Health, 2022; 25(7). 14. D. Cardone, L. Borowski, and A. A. Essilfie, Nonoperative treatment of Meniscus Tears, The Management of Meniscal Pathology, 2020; 53–60. 15. M. Rai et al., Gene expression in meniscus tears at the time of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy predicts osteoarthritis progression, Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 2020; 8:7_suppl6.