Study of Outcome of Total Hip Replacement in Adults with Arthritis in a Teaching Hospital
Authors/Creators
- 1. Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, ACSR Govt Medical College, Nelore, Andhra Pradesh
- 2. Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, ACSR Govt Medical College, Nelore, Andhra Pradesh
- 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, ACSR Govt Medical College, Nelore, Andhra Pradesh
Description
Aim: Current study aim is to assess the clinical and functional outcomes of cemented Total Hip Replacement in adults using Modified Harris Hip Score in terms of pain, functional disabilities, deformity, range of movements, limb length discrepancy. Method: An observational study carried out on 30 hips of 30 patients who underwent cemented Total Hip Replacement and were available for follow-up. This study conducted on patients with age ranging from 50 – 70 years with mean age of 58.3 years. A thorough clinical and radiological examination was performed. All patients were operated through Hardinge’s direct lateral approach, putting the patient in the lateral position. Quadriceps and knee bending exercises were started immediately post-op. Ambulation training is started with the walker on Day 1-2, followed by gait training with weight-bearing as tolerated on Day 3-7. Full weight bearing on involved extremity can be started on Day 7. Results: 66.7% are males and 33.3% are females underwent Cemented total hip replacement. 13 patients were operated on the left side. Indication for surgery was secondary arthritis due to AVN in 66.7% cases, 3.3% due to ankylosing spondylitis, 6.7% was due to Rheumatoid arthritis which is confirmed by clinical evaluation and blood investigations. The mean follow-up period was 18.8 months. The patients were followed postoperatively at six weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. 6.7%patients had varus angulation of the stem who complained of anterior thigh pain postoperatively. One patient had a superficial infection that was treated with antibiotics and delayed suture removal. 6.7% patients had leg length discrepancy and shortening who were treated with a shoe raise. All patients were followed up regularly; no patients were lost for follow up. They were evaluated according to the Modified Harris Hip score. The mean total preoperative score was 45.04. The maximum score is 62, and the minimum is 21. Postoperatively the total mean score was 88.44, with 74 being the minimum and 95 being the maximum. The mean follow-up Modified Harris Hip score increased to 91.60, with a minimum of 77 and a maximum of 97. There were a statistically significant improvement p=0.044 (‘p’ value of <0.001) in the follow-up score when compared to the preoperative score. Conclusion: Results showed a significant improvement, wherein 84% had an excellent score, and 8% showed good and 8% fair results. No patient had a poor score. The management of diseased and destroyed hips with cemented total hip replacement is effective and gives stable, mobile, and painless hip joints to the patient. Functional results are excellent, and complications are minimal if done with utmost care and precision. This study has shown that the outcome of the total hip arthroplasty has shown excellent results in terms of pain relief, increased walking distance, and functional capabilities in patients. Most of the patients were elderly active treated with a cemented total hip replacement and have shown excellent clinical and radiological results after an intermediate period of follow-up. The overall functional and clinical outcome showed good results.
Abstract (English)
Aim: Current study aim is to assess the clinical and functional outcomes of cemented Total Hip Replacement in adults using Modified Harris Hip Score in terms of pain, functional disabilities, deformity, range of movements, limb length discrepancy. Method: An observational study carried out on 30 hips of 30 patients who underwent cemented Total Hip Replacement and were available for follow-up. This study conducted on patients with age ranging from 50 – 70 years with mean age of 58.3 years. A thorough clinical and radiological examination was performed. All patients were operated through Hardinge’s direct lateral approach, putting the patient in the lateral position. Quadriceps and knee bending exercises were started immediately post-op. Ambulation training is started with the walker on Day 1-2, followed by gait training with weight-bearing as tolerated on Day 3-7. Full weight bearing on involved extremity can be started on Day 7. Results: 66.7% are males and 33.3% are females underwent Cemented total hip replacement. 13 patients were operated on the left side. Indication for surgery was secondary arthritis due to AVN in 66.7% cases, 3.3% due to ankylosing spondylitis, 6.7% was due to Rheumatoid arthritis which is confirmed by clinical evaluation and blood investigations. The mean follow-up period was 18.8 months. The patients were followed postoperatively at six weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. 6.7%patients had varus angulation of the stem who complained of anterior thigh pain postoperatively. One patient had a superficial infection that was treated with antibiotics and delayed suture removal. 6.7% patients had leg length discrepancy and shortening who were treated with a shoe raise. All patients were followed up regularly; no patients were lost for follow up. They were evaluated according to the Modified Harris Hip score. The mean total preoperative score was 45.04. The maximum score is 62, and the minimum is 21. Postoperatively the total mean score was 88.44, with 74 being the minimum and 95 being the maximum. The mean follow-up Modified Harris Hip score increased to 91.60, with a minimum of 77 and a maximum of 97. There were a statistically significant improvement p=0.044 (‘p’ value of <0.001) in the follow-up score when compared to the preoperative score. Conclusion: Results showed a significant improvement, wherein 84% had an excellent score, and 8% showed good and 8% fair results. No patient had a poor score. The management of diseased and destroyed hips with cemented total hip replacement is effective and gives stable, mobile, and painless hip joints to the patient. Functional results are excellent, and complications are minimal if done with utmost care and precision. This study has shown that the outcome of the total hip arthroplasty has shown excellent results in terms of pain relief, increased walking distance, and functional capabilities in patients. Most of the patients were elderly active treated with a cemented total hip replacement and have shown excellent clinical and radiological results after an intermediate period of follow-up. The overall functional and clinical outcome showed good results.
Files
IJPCR,Vol15,Issue12,Article228.pdf
Files
(392.5 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:791b2e1d0afa1c2024376f86005528fc
|
392.5 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Dates
- Accepted
-
2023-12-25
Software
- Repository URL
- https://impactfactor.org/PDF/IJPCR/15/IJPCR,Vol15,Issue12,Article228.pdf
- Development Status
- Active
References
- 1. Liu XW, Zi Y, Xiang LB, Wang Y. Total hip arthroplasty: areview of advances, advantages and limitations. International journal of clinical and experimental medicine. 2015; 8(1):27. 2. Lam YF, Chan PK, Fu H, Yan CH, Chiu KY. A review of the clinical approach to persistent pain following total hip replacement. Hong Kong Medical Journal. 2016. 3. Dimitriou D, Antoniadis A, Flury A, Liebhauser M, Helmy N. Total hip arthroplasty improves the quality-adjusted life years in patients who exceeded the estimated life expectancy. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2018 Nov 1; 33(11):3484-9. 4. Jensen C, Roos EM, Kjærsgaard-Andersen P, Overgaard S. The effect of education and supervised exercise vs. education alone on the time to total hip replacement in patients with severe hip osteoarthritis. A randomized clinical trial protocol. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2013 Dec; 14:1-9. 5. Berger RA, Kull LR, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty: 7-to 10-year results. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1976-2007). 1996 Dec 1; 333:134- 46. 6. Goldberg VM. Selection of bone grafts for revision total hip arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1976- 2007). 2000 Dec 1; 381:68-76. 7. Harkess JW: Arthroplasty of hip., Campbells Operative Orthpeadics, Edited by AH Crenshaw, 8th edition, Vol. 1: CV Mosby Company, St. Louis, Washington DC, Torto, 1982. 8. Eftekhar NS., Total hip replacement using principles of low-fricton arthroplasty: The Hip. Surgery of the musculoskelof thesystem, Edited by CM Evarts, Vol.3: Churchill Livingston, 1983. 9. Charnley J; Low friction arthroplasty of the hip: Theory and practice,Springer- Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1979. 10. Shah N, Singh AK, Sharma A, Pawar E, Nadwi ST, Shet V. Preoperative assessment and postoperative outcome of total hip replacement in adults with AVN. International Journal of Orthopaedics. 2017; 3(3):986-91. 11. Chowdhury AZ, Siddiquee TH, Kaiser MS, Arifeen MN, Salek AK, Joarder AI, Khair MA, Mannan M, Haque MA. Primary total hip arthroplasty by cemented prosthesis in secondary osteoarthritis of the hip joint. Mymensingh Med J. 2012 Jul; 21(3): 503-8. 12. Kim YH, Oh SH, Kim JS. Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Second- Generation Cementless Total Hip Prosthesis in Patients Younger Than Fifty Years of Age. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jan 01; 85(1):109-114.13. Pallaver A, Zwicky L, Bolliger L, Bösebeck H, Manzoni I, Schädelin S, Ochsner PE, Clauss M. Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component. Archives of orthopedic and trauma surgery. 2018 Nov 1; 138(11):1609-16. 14. Jasty M, Maloney WJ, Bragdon CR. Histomorphological studies of the long term skeletal responses to well-fixed cemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg 1990; 72A: 1220. 15. Verdonschot N, Huiskes R Cement debonding process in total hip arthroplasty stems. Clin Orthop 1997; 336: 297. 16. Barrack RL, Mulroy Jr RD, Harris WH. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume. 1992 May; 74(3):385-9. 17. Madey SM, Callaghan JJ, Olejniczak JP, Goetz DD, Johnston RC. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Jan; 79(1):53-64. 18. Amstutz HC, Grigoris P. Metal on metal bearings in hip arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1976- 2007). 1996 Aug 1; 329:S11-34. 19. Konyves A, Bannister GC, The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg.2005; 87:55-7. 20. Graves SE, Davidson D, Ingerson L, Ryan P, Griffith EC, McDermott BF, McElroy HJ, Pratt NL. The Australian orthopaedic association national joint replacement registry. Medical Journal of Australia. 2004 Mar; 180:S31-4. 21. Hailer NP, Garellick G, Kärrholm J. Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: evaluation of 170,413 operations. Acta orthopaedica. 2010 Feb 1; 81(1):34-41.