Comparative Insights Into Copyright Disclaimers of the United States and India
Description
This study delves into the realm of copyright disclaimers, serving as declarations to apprise users of the protected nature of reproduced content and to assert the copyright owner's rights. Focusing on the legal frameworks outlined in Section 107 of the US Copyright Act, 1976, and Section 52 of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957, the research investigates various types of copyright disclaimers, their prerequisites, and the associated legal landscape. Employing the doctrinal method of research, the study extensively examines fair use and fair dealing doctrines within the context of copyright laws in the United States and India. By utilizing primary and secondary sources, the paper analyses and compares legal provisions and interpretations of these doctrines, shedding light on their scope, limitations, and practical applications. A key emphasis is placed on the intricacies of writing a copyright disclaimer, and a sample disclaimer is included. Understanding copyright disclaimers is deemed crucial for individuals and organizations aiming to honour intellectual property rights while navigating the intricate web of copyright law. The research contributes valuable insights into how fair use and fair dealing are construed and applied in the United States and India, unravelling the legal framework surrounding the use of copyrighted materials in these jurisdictions. By exploring the similarities and differences between the two doctrines, this study provides a nuanced understanding of the legal landscape of copyright law in both jurisdictions. Its findings serve as a valuable resource for scholars, practitioners, and policymakers engaged in the field of intellectual property rights, offering comprehensive information on the interpretation and implementation of fair use and fair dealing in the United States and India.
Files
11. Sayed.pdf
Files
(1.1 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:6859020b36be2f9ffdb764ba78c8eebe
|
1.1 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Identifiers
References
- [1]Upendra Baxi, Copyright Law and Justice in India, 28 J. Indian Law Inst. 497 (1986). [2]U.S. Copyright Office Fair Use Index, https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/ (last visited May 16, 2023). [3]Copyright Office: Exceptions To Infringement Under Copyright Act, 1957, https://copyright.gov.in/Exceptions.aspx (last visited May 16, 2023). [4]Duration of Copyrights (Bitlaw), https://www.bitlaw.com/copyright/duration.html (last visited May 16, 2023). [5]Copyright Protection in India- Overview and Recent Developments, https://intellectual-property-helpdesk.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/copyright-protection-india-overview-and-recent-developments-2022-03-02_en (last visited May 16, 2023). [6]Parody: Fair Use Or Copyright Infringement, Findlaw, https://corporate.findlaw.com/intellectual-property/parody-fair-use-or-copyright-infringement.html (last visited May 16, 2023). [7]8 Parts of a Perfect Copyright Page, Creative Law Center (2020), https://creativelawcenter.com/copyright-page/ (last visited May 16, 2023). [8]TRIPS: Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual property rights, April 15, 1994., WTO | intellectual property - overview of TRIPS Agreement, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/intel2_e.htm (last visited May 16, 2023). [9]Berne Convention for the Protection of literary and Artistic Works, September 9, 1886., Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, https://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/berne/index.html (last visited May 16, 2023). [10]Primary Sources on Copyright - Record Viewer, https://www.copyrighthistory.org/cam/tools/request/showRecord.php?id=commentary_uk_1741 (last visited May 16, 2023). [11]Folsom v. Marsh | Case Brief for Law School | LexisNexis, Community, https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/casebrief/p/casebrief-folsom-v-marsh (last visited May 16, 2023).