Published April 26, 2024 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Yield development and nutrient offtake in contrasting Miscanthus genotypes under green and brown harvest regimes

Authors/Creators

  • 1. University of Hohenheim

Description

Harvest time is an important variable that determines the yield of miscanthus biomass, its possible end uses, and the nutrient offtake from the field. Green harvests result in a higher yield and greater nutrient removal from the field. Brown miscanthus harvests, carried out in late winter or early spring, result in lower yields, and a lower nutrient offtake, whereby the harvested biomass is better suited to use in combustion. To look at the long term impact of green harvests on miscanthus this experiment followed the yield development of two miscanthus genotypes subjected to green and brown harvests over a period of seven years at one site in Southern Germany. The standard commercial genotype Miscanthus x giganteus (Mxg) was compared to a novel late-ripening Miscanthus sinensis genotype: Syn55.  Average yields of Mxg were 19.9 t ha-1 for green harvests and 13.2 t ha-1 for brown harvests compared to 13.9 t ha-1 and 12.9 t ha-1 for green and brown harvested Syn55 respectively. Yields of Mxg were very different for green and brown harvests; green harvested Mxg had very high nutrient offtake, while brown harvested Mxg had the lowest nutrient offtakes of all treatments. Syn55 showed a less marked difference between green and brown harvests likely due to its tendency to retain its leaves over winter. Syn55 was however not tolerant of a green harvest, with yields of brown harvested stands surpassing the yield of green harvested stands in several years. Mxg was shown to be tolerant of green harvests, producing consistently high yields when harvested in October. Early signs of yield decline were detected in both genotypes when harvested green, likely due to incomplete carbohydrate relocation. Alternating green and brown harvests are recommended to allow stands to replenish carbohydrate stores and to form a litter layer.  

Notes

Funding provided by: University of Hohenheim
ROR ID: https://ror.org/00b1c9541
Award Number:

Methods

Harvest data was collected by harvesting miscanthus plants by hand and with a field harvester. Samples were taken and dried in a drying cupboard to a constant weight. The mineral content of miscanthus biomass was determined in the lab following methods laid out by VDLUFA. Mineral content data was combined with harvest data to calculate mineral offtake in the biomass. 

Temperature data was collected from weather stations located at Unterer Lindenhof, operated by the Agricultural Technology Centre (LTZ Augustenberg).
Temperature data were also collected by soil sensors from the company TOMST set up in individual experimental plots.

The McVicker equation was used to calculate degree days in the field.

Files

README.md

Files (386.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:44aaa701981aba3196c0df549efcd692
1.2 kB Preview Download
md5:2948f6c00191e7fd907582ac420c2776
32.6 kB Preview Download
md5:32e36c7508b2008233ab6958ef38b29a
14.1 kB Download
md5:5678a136840b3b921d8bd2f5d8d2b099
189.5 kB Preview Download
md5:3a0652cbd98b739c5a09ae7b18ba214f
32.0 kB Download
md5:99a305e6c6a49e0b4234ac8a53e77f75
117.0 kB Preview Download