The Comprehensive Evaluation and Management of Ocular Trauma in a Tertiary Eye Care Center of Central India
Authors/Creators
- 1. Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, N.S.C.B. Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
- 2. Designate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, N.S.C.B. Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
- 3. Professor & HOD Department of Ophthalmology, N.S.C.B. Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
Description
Objectives: This study was aimed to examine the presence of visual damage due to ocular trauma and assess visual outcomes, and document the clinical spectrum and outcome following ocular injuries among patients presenting to tertiary care centre in central India. Methods and Material: This was a hospital-based prospective interventional study conducted over a period of two years from August 2019 to August 2021. Patients with ocular injuries attending the casualty and the Ophthalmology department were included in the study after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A detailed and comprehensive ophthalmic examination was performed and visual acuity was noted at the presentation and follow-ups. The patients were followed up at regular intervals, initially at one week and subsequently at three and six weeks upto 6 months. Results: During this study, 182 patients and 200 eyes with ocular injuries taken into consideration, amongst them there were 141 males (77.47%) and 41 females (22.53%) patients. The male to female ratio was 3.43:1. [Table- 1] During this study, age group with more incidence of ocular trauma was 21 – 30 years (31.32%). [Table -1] In our study, according to BETTS classification close globe injuries (69.5%) were more common than open globe injuries (30.5%). [Table-2] Contusion injuries (62%) were more common in closed globe injury while penetrating globe injuries (17%) were more common in open globe injuries. [Table-2] Ocular trauma score (OTS) 5 belonged to close globe injuries whereas ocular trauma score 1 belonged to open globe injuries, remaining ocular trauma score 2, 3, 4 belonged to both open and closed globe injuries and most of ocular injuries were between ocular trauma score 3 to 5. [Table-3] Ocular adnexa (75.5%) were predominately affected in ocular injuries with periorbital edema or ecchymosis (26%) being most common followed by lid laceration (23.5%) whereas sclera (10%) was least affected. [Table-4] Conjunctiva (47%) was the second most common structure to be involved in ocular trauma with subconjunctival haemorrhage (28%) being most common clinical presentation with conjunctival injuries. [Table-5] Cornea (42.5%) and iris (43.5%) were affected in almost equal proportions, presenting commonly as corneal foreign body (12.5%) and iris prolapse (17%) respectively. [Table-5] Traumatic cataract (7.5%) was the most common finding followed by Subluxated or dislocated (4.5%) in patients with Lens related injuries (13%). [Table-5] Among anterior chamber (36.5%) involvement, traumatic hyphema (17%) was found to be most common presentation [Table-5]. Vitreous (14%) was the most common structure affected followed by retina (12%) in posterior segment injuries (35%).[Table-6] Lid repair (23.5%) was most commonly performed surgery in closed globe and corneal-scleral laceration related surgeries (28.5%) most common surgical intervention in open globe injuries. [Table-7] Corneal opacities (25.5%) most common late complication followed by cataract (7.5%) and secondary glaucoma (5%) after ocular trauma. [Table-8] In closed globe injuries, 34.54% patients had less than 6/60 vision at the time of presentation which reduced to 12.23% after 6 months. [Table-9] In open globe injuries, only 44.26% of patient had visual acuity less than 6/60 after 6 months as compared to 96.72% at the time of presentation. [Table-10]. Conclusion: Ocular trauma remains a significant cause of monocular vision loss especially in developing country like India. Rural and young population are more prone to ocular trauma, entailing increased lifetime of disability years. Though open and closed injuries both causes long term complication and vision loss, open globe has poorer prognosis and ocular trauma score (OTS) is a simple and effective way to assess the visual of outcome. Medical as well as surgical intervention forms integral part of management in ocular trauma patients.
Abstract (English)
Objectives: This study was aimed to examine the presence of visual damage due to ocular trauma and assess visual outcomes, and document the clinical spectrum and outcome following ocular injuries among patients presenting to tertiary care centre in central India. Methods and Material: This was a hospital-based prospective interventional study conducted over a period of two years from August 2019 to August 2021. Patients with ocular injuries attending the casualty and the Ophthalmology department were included in the study after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A detailed and comprehensive ophthalmic examination was performed and visual acuity was noted at the presentation and follow-ups. The patients were followed up at regular intervals, initially at one week and subsequently at three and six weeks upto 6 months. Results: During this study, 182 patients and 200 eyes with ocular injuries taken into consideration, amongst them there were 141 males (77.47%) and 41 females (22.53%) patients. The male to female ratio was 3.43:1. [Table- 1] During this study, age group with more incidence of ocular trauma was 21 – 30 years (31.32%). [Table -1] In our study, according to BETTS classification close globe injuries (69.5%) were more common than open globe injuries (30.5%). [Table-2] Contusion injuries (62%) were more common in closed globe injury while penetrating globe injuries (17%) were more common in open globe injuries. [Table-2] Ocular trauma score (OTS) 5 belonged to close globe injuries whereas ocular trauma score 1 belonged to open globe injuries, remaining ocular trauma score 2, 3, 4 belonged to both open and closed globe injuries and most of ocular injuries were between ocular trauma score 3 to 5. [Table-3] Ocular adnexa (75.5%) were predominately affected in ocular injuries with periorbital edema or ecchymosis (26%) being most common followed by lid laceration (23.5%) whereas sclera (10%) was least affected. [Table-4] Conjunctiva (47%) was the second most common structure to be involved in ocular trauma with subconjunctival haemorrhage (28%) being most common clinical presentation with conjunctival injuries. [Table-5] Cornea (42.5%) and iris (43.5%) were affected in almost equal proportions, presenting commonly as corneal foreign body (12.5%) and iris prolapse (17%) respectively. [Table-5] Traumatic cataract (7.5%) was the most common finding followed by Subluxated or dislocated (4.5%) in patients with Lens related injuries (13%). [Table-5] Among anterior chamber (36.5%) involvement, traumatic hyphema (17%) was found to be most common presentation [Table-5]. Vitreous (14%) was the most common structure affected followed by retina (12%) in posterior segment injuries (35%).[Table-6] Lid repair (23.5%) was most commonly performed surgery in closed globe and corneal-scleral laceration related surgeries (28.5%) most common surgical intervention in open globe injuries. [Table-7] Corneal opacities (25.5%) most common late complication followed by cataract (7.5%) and secondary glaucoma (5%) after ocular trauma. [Table-8] In closed globe injuries, 34.54% patients had less than 6/60 vision at the time of presentation which reduced to 12.23% after 6 months. [Table-9] In open globe injuries, only 44.26% of patient had visual acuity less than 6/60 after 6 months as compared to 96.72% at the time of presentation. [Table-10]. Conclusion: Ocular trauma remains a significant cause of monocular vision loss especially in developing country like India. Rural and young population are more prone to ocular trauma, entailing increased lifetime of disability years. Though open and closed injuries both causes long term complication and vision loss, open globe has poorer prognosis and ocular trauma score (OTS) is a simple and effective way to assess the visual of outcome. Medical as well as surgical intervention forms integral part of management in ocular trauma patients.
Files
IJPCR,Vol16,Issue2,Article21.pdf
Files
(3.8 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:30b10cecab9561198802bbfe3fa3f0ea
|
3.8 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Dates
- Accepted
-
2024-01-26
Software
- Repository URL
- https://impactfactor.org/PDF/IJPCR/16/IJPCR,Vol16,Issue2,Article21.pdf
- Development Status
- Active
References
- 1. Charles O, Ericson O, Olakunle T, Bukola O, Chidi O, olumuyiwa A. Pattern of ocular injuries in Owo, Nigeria.J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2011; 6(2): 114–118 2. Shivanand b. patil, Abhinav biala, amishi Khanna, anjumeena: prevalence of ocular trauma in KLES hospital: A 1-year cross sectional study. Indian journal of health sciences 2016:9; 175-8. 3. Glynn RJ, Seddon JM, Berlin BM. The incidence of eye injuries in New England. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988; 106:785-9. 4. Desai P, MacEwen CJ, Baines P, Minaissian DC. Epidemiology and implications of ocular trauma admitted to hospital in Scotland. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996; 50:436-41. 5. Fong LP. Eye injuries in Victoria, Australia. Med J Aust 1995; 162:64 68. 6. Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD. Epidemiology of blinding trauma in the United States Eye Injury Regi tries. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2006; 13:209–216. 7. Wong TY, Klein ES, Klein R. The prevalence and 5-year incidence of ocular trauma: The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2000; 107:2196–2202 8. McCarty CA, Fu CL, Taylor HR. Epidemiology of ocular trauma in Australia. Ophthalmology 1999; 106:1847–1852. 9. Kerkar S, Mandke C, Shah J. Study of prognostic factors and visual outcome in open globe injuries in a tertiary care hospital in Mumbai. IJSR. 2017; 6(8):396-9. 10. Baker SP, O'Neill B, Haddon W Jr., Long WB. The injury severity score: A method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 1974; 14:187-96.11. Copes WS, Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Lawnick MM, Keast SL, Bain LW, et al. The injury severity score revisited. J Trauma 1988; 28:69-77. 12. Abraham DI, Vitale SI, West SI, Isseme I. Epidemiology of eye injuries in rural Tanzania. Ophthalmic Epidemiol1999; 6:85-94. 13. Alfaro DV 3rd, Jablon EP, Rodriguez Fontal M, Villalba SJ, Morris RE, Grossman M, et al. Fishing-related ocular trauma. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139:488-92. 14. Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, Mester V. The Birmingham eye trauma terminology system (BETT). J Fr Ophtalmol2004; 27:206-10. 15. Cao H, Li L, Zhang M Epidemiology of Patients Hospitalized for Ocular Trauma in the Chaoshan Region of China, 2001–2010; PLoS ONE 2012; 7(10): e48377. 16. Karaman K. Gveroviae-Antunica A, Rogosiae V et al; epidemiology of adult eye injuries in split Dalmatian country. Croat Med J. 2004; 45(3): 304-9. 17. Ekta Syal, Munish Dhawan, Surinder Pal Singh: To study the epidemiological and clinical profile of ocular trauma at a tertiary healthcare facility. Delta Journal of Ophthalmology 2018, 19:259–267. 18. Maurya RP, Srivastav T, Singh VP, Mishra C P, Al-Mujaini A. The epidemiology of ocular trauma in Northern India: A teaching hospital study. Oman J Ophthalmol 2019;12:78-83 19. FasinaOluyemi: Epidemiology of Penetrating Eye Injury in Ibadan: A 10Year HospitalBased Review. Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology.2011, Volume 18. 20. Mehul shah, Shreya shah, Rajiv khandekar: ocular injuries and visual status before and after their management in the tribal area of western India-A historical cohort study. Grafe,s Archive and experimental Ophthalmology, 2008; 246(2), 191-197. 21. Salvatore Cillino, Alessandra Casuccio, Francesco Di Pace, Francesco Pillitteri and Giovanni Cillino: A five-year retrospective study of the epidemiological characteristics and visual outcomes of patients hospitalized for ocular trauma in a Mediterranean area. BMC ophthalmology 2008, 1471-2415/8/6. 22. Misra S, Nandwani R, Gogri P, Misra N. Clinical profile and visual outcome of ocular injuries in a rural area of western India. AMJ 2013, 6, 11, 560-564. http// dx.doi.org/ 10.4066/ AMJ.2013.1876. 23. Bhupally AK et al. Ocular trauma Int J Res Med Sci. 2015 Dec; 3(12):3714-3719. 24. Du Toit N, Mustak H, Cook C. Visual outcomes in patients with open globe injuries compared to predicted outcomes using the ocular trauma scoring system. Int J Ophthalmol2015; 8:1229-33. 25. Page RD, Gupta SK, Jenkins TL, Karcioglu ZA. Risk factors for poor outcomes in patients with open-globe injuries. Clin Ophthalmol2016; 10:1461-6. 26. Ustaoglu M, Karapapak M, Tiryaki S, Dirim AB, Olgun A, Duzgun E, et al. Demographic characteristics and visual outcomes of open globe injuries in a tertiary hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. Eur J Trauma EmergSurg 2018. 10.1007/s00068-018-1060-2. 27. Alam J, Bhattacharjya H, Roy A, Das M. Epidemiology and outcome of ocular trauma among the road traffic accident cases attending a tertiary care hospital in Tripura. Int J Med Sci Public Health Scope Med. 2014; 3(4):422. 28. Marudhamuthu E, Sivakumar N, Kumaravel T. Study of ocular injuries in road traffic accident patients. J Evolution Med Dent Sci. 2017; 6(41):3219-22. 29. Mela EK, Mantzouranis GA, Giakoumis AP, Blatsios G, Andrikopoulos GK, Gartaganis SP. Ocular trauma in a Greek population: review of 899 cases resulting in hospitalization. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2005; 12:185-90. 30. .Manhas A et al. A 5 year retrospective study on epidemiological pattern of ocular traumaInt J Res Med Sci. 2019 Jul; 7(7):2785-2788. 31. Wong TY, Klein BE, Klein R, Tomany SC. Relation of ocular trauma to cortical, nuclear, and posterior subcapsular cataracts: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86(2):152–155. 32. McCarty CA, Mukesh BN, Fu CL, Taylor HR. The epidemiology of cataract in Australia. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;128(4):446–465. 33. Julio E, De Leon-Ortiga, Christopher. Ocular trauma related glaucoma – OCNA 15 (2002); 215-223. 34. KD Bojikian, AL Stein, MA Slabaugh and PP Chen: Incidence and risk factors for traumatic intraocular pressure elevation and traumatic glaucoma after open-globe injury. Eye (2015) 29, 1579–1584. 35. Dana MR, Werner MS, Viana MA, Shapiro MJ (1993). Spontaneous and traumatic vitreous hemorrhage. Ophthalmology; 100: 1377- 1383 36. Cox MS. Retinal breaks caused by blunt nonperforating trauma at the point of impact. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1980; 78: 414-66. 37. Hooshangfaghihi et al. Posttraumatic endophthalmitis (2012). Retina 32:146–151. 38. Lee KJ, Oh JH. A statistical observation of the ocular injuries. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 1990; 31:229–239. 39. Vats S, Murthy GV, Chandra M, Gupta SK, Vashist P, Gogoi M. Epidemiological study of ocular trauma in an urban slum population in Delhi,India. Indian J Ophthalmol2008; 56:313- 316.40. Jain BS, Soni SR. Ocular injuries. An analytical study in a teaching general hospital IJO 1987; 35 (3): 112-116. 41. 40. .Schmidt GW, Broman AT, Hindman HB, Grant MP. Vision survival after open globe injury predicted by classification and regression tree analysis. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115 (1):202–9. 42. Han SB, Yu HG. Visual outcome after open globe injury and its predictive factors in Korea. J Trauma. 2010; 69(5):E66–72