Shrinkage Assessment of Different Denture Bases: A Comparative Study
Authors/Creators
- 1. Ex-SR, Department of Dentistry, SSMC, Rewa
- 2. Reader, Department of Prosthodontics, Crown & Bridge, BBD College of Dental Sciences, Lucknow.
- 3. Reader, Department of Prosthodontics, Crown & Bridge, Saraswati Dental College, Lucknow. 4
- 4. Dean, P.G. Research & Studies, Head of Department of Prosthodontics, Crown & Bridge, Saraswati Dental College, Lucknow
- 5. Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Crown & Bridge, Saraswati Dental College, Lucknow.
Description
Introduction: Different polymers have been created and used therapeutically as denture foundation materials in dentistry. heat cure acrylic resin, was first released in 1937; this substance, when created via the compression molding method, continues to be the preferred denture foundation material. The volumetric shrinkage of resin is the main factor mentioned for the denture base’s failure to adapt in the palatal and post-palatal seal region of maxillary dentures. Chemical activators, also known as cold-curing, self-curing, and autopolymerizing resins, were first employed in 1947 to induce polymerization at ambient temperature. photoinitiator systems with camphoroquinone as the initiator and visible light as the activator were used to create light-activated denture base resins. Aims and Objective: The objectives of this study was to evaluate the dimensional and volumetric shrinkage in all the four (heat cure acrylic resin, cold cure acrylic resin, light cure acrylic resin and shellac base plate) denture base material. Materials & Method: An in vitro experimental study was carried out, where 4 types of acrylic resin were compared; Group 1 heat cure acrylic resin (Denstply), group 2 Self cure acrylic resin (Dentsply), group 3 light cure acrylic resin (dentsply), group 4 Shellac base plate (Pyrex). A typical flexible rubber mold was used to create a total of 40 prostheses (n = 10 per group) from high strength dental stone (type III stone). Conclusion : Dentures created using heat-cured acrylic resin displayed the maximum amount of polymerization shrinkage within the confines of the current investigation.
Abstract (English)
Introduction: Different polymers have been created and used therapeutically as denture foundation materials in dentistry. heat cure acrylic resin, was first released in 1937; this substance, when created via the compression molding method, continues to be the preferred denture foundation material. The volumetric shrinkage of resin is the main factor mentioned for the denture base’s failure to adapt in the palatal and post-palatal seal region of maxillary dentures. Chemical activators, also known as cold-curing, self-curing, and autopolymerizing resins, were first employed in 1947 to induce polymerization at ambient temperature. photoinitiator systems with camphoroquinone as the initiator and visible light as the activator were used to create light-activated denture base resins. Aims and Objective: The objectives of this study was to evaluate the dimensional and volumetric shrinkage in all the four (heat cure acrylic resin, cold cure acrylic resin, light cure acrylic resin and shellac base plate) denture base material. Materials & Method: An in vitro experimental study was carried out, where 4 types of acrylic resin were compared; Group 1 heat cure acrylic resin (Denstply), group 2 Self cure acrylic resin (Dentsply), group 3 light cure acrylic resin (dentsply), group 4 Shellac base plate (Pyrex). A typical flexible rubber mold was used to create a total of 40 prostheses (n = 10 per group) from high strength dental stone (type III stone). Conclusion : Dentures created using heat-cured acrylic resin displayed the maximum amount of polymerization shrinkage within the confines of the current investigation.
Files
IJPCR,Vol16,Issue3,Article58.pdf
Files
(297.8 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:8c616ba74f9281478b539deaab4bf583
|
297.8 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Dates
- Accepted
-
2024-03-05
Software
- Repository URL
- http://impactfactor.org/PDF/IJPCR/16/IJPCR,Vol16,Issue3,Article58.pdf
- Development Status
- Active
References
- 1. Abby, A.; Kumar, R.; Shibu, J. &Chakrav - arthy, R. Comparison ofthe linear dimensional accuracy of denture bases cured the by conventional method and by the new press technique. Indian J.Dent. Res., 2011; 22(2):200-4. 2. Akin, H.; Tugut, F. & Polat, Z. A. In vitro comparison of the cytotoxicityand water sorption of two different denture base systems. J. Prosthodont., 2015;24(2):152-5. 3. Artopoulos, A.; Juszczyk, A. S.; Rodriguez, J. M.; Clark, R. K. &Radford, D. R. Three-dimensional processing deformation of three denture base materials. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2013; 110(6):481-7. 4. Babu, S.; Manjunath, S. &Vajawat, M. Effect of palatal form on movement of teeth during processing of complete denture prosthesis: An invitro study. Contemp. Clin. Dent., 7(1):36- 40,2016. 5. Braden, M. The absorption of water by acrylic resins and the rmaterials. J. Prosthet. Dent., 1964;14(2):307-16. 6. Consani, R. L.; Domitti, S. S. & Consani, S. Effect of a new tension system, used in acrylic resin flasking, on the dimensional stability ofdenture bases. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2002; 88(3): 285-9. 7. Dixon, D. L.; Breeding, L. C. & Ekstrand, K. G. Linear dimensional variability of three denture base resins after processing and in water storage. J. Prosthet. Dent., 1992; 68(1):196-200. 8. El Bahra, S.; Ludwig, K.; Samran, A.; FreitagWolf, S. & Kern, M.Linear and volumetric dimensional changes of injection-molded PMMA denture base resins. Dent. Mater., 2013; 29(11): 1091-7. 9. Fenlon, M. R.; Juszczyk, A. S.; Rodriguez, J. M. & Curtis, R. V. Dimensional stability of complete denture permanent acrylic resin denture bases; A comparison of dimensions before and after a second curing cycle. Eur. J. Prosthodont. Restor. Dent., 2010; 18(1):33-8. 10. Firtell, D. N.; Green, A. J. & Elahi, J. M. Posterior peripheral sealdistortion related to processing temperature. J. Prosthet. Dent.,45(6):598-601, 1981. 11. Gharechahi, J.; Asadzadeh, N.; Shahabian, F. & Gharechahi, M. Dimensional changes of acrylic resin denture bases: conventional. VallejoLabrada, M. & Ocampo, B. L. C. 12. Comparison of the polymerization shrinkage of Eclipse resin for prostheses with conventional acrylic resins. Int. J. Odontostomat.,2019; 13(3):279-286. 13. Conventional versus injection-molding technique. J. Dent. (Tehran), 2014; 11(4):398-405. 14. Keenan, P. L.; Radford, D. R. & Clark, R. K. Dimensional change incomplete dentures fabricated by injection molding and microwave processing. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2003; 89(1):37-44. 15. Lamb, D. J.; Samara, R. & Johnson, A. Palatal discrepancies and postdams. J. Oral Rehabil., 2005; 32(3):188-92. 16. Lim, S. R. & Lee, J. S. Three-dimensional deformation of dry-stored complete denture base at room temperature. J. Adv. Prosthdont., 2016; 8(4):296-303. 17. Machado, C.; Sanchez, E.; Azer, S. S. & Uribe, J. M. Comparative study of the transverse strength of three denture base materials. J. Dent., 2007; 35(12):930-3. 18. McCabe, J. F. & Wilson, H. J. The use of differential scanning calorimetry for the evaluation of dental materials. Part II. Denturebase materials. J. Oral. Rehabil., 7(3):235-43, 1980. 19. Mowery, W. E.; Burns, C. L.; Dickson, G. & Sweeney, W. T. Dimensionalstability of denture base resins. J. Am. Dent. Assoc.,1958; 57(3):345-53. 20. Pasam, N.; Hallikerimath, R. B.; Arora, A. &Gilra, S. Effect of different curing temperatures on the distortion at the posterior peripheral seal: an in vitro study. Indian. J. Dent. Res., 2012; 23(3):301-4. 21. Skinner, E. W. & Cooper, E. N. Physical properties of denture resins: Part I. Curing shrinkage and water sorption. J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 1943; 30(23):1845-52. 22. Soto Pe., J. M. & L.pez Salgado, A. Comparaci. n de cambios dimensionalesen bases prot.sicas de acr. licoscuradospor calory microondas. Rev. Odontol. Mex., 2004; 8(1-2):10-6. 23. Wong, D. M.; Cheng, L. Y.; Chow, T. W. & Clark, R. K. Effect of processing method on the dimensional accuracy and waters orption of acrylic resin dentures. J. Prosthet. Dent., 1999; 81(3):300-4. 24. Yeung, K. C.; Chow, T. W. & Clark, R. K. F. Temperature and dimensional changes in the two-stage processing technique for complete dentures. J. Dent., 1995;23(4):245-53.