Published March 15, 2024 | Version v1
Preprint Open

The Prevalence and Effects of Unwanted Abortions in Canada: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study

  • 1. Elliot Institute
  • 2. Charlotte Lozier Institute

Description

Abstract

Background: It is common for women to report feeling pressured into abortions. Those who abort contrary to their own values and preferences are more likely to experience more negative emotional and psychological outcomes. But the full breadth and timing of negative reactions has not been fully explored, especially among Canadians.

Methods: Portions of the Unwanted Abortion Studies were deployed in a survey of 1,141 Canadian women 41-45 years of age, inclusive, to compare the types and degree of pressures they face compared to their American counterparts.  Twenty-three additional symptoms were assessed as well as a measure of when, if at all, negative post-abortion reactions were most severe.

Results:  With a 98.3% completion rate, 26.7% of eligible respondents reported a history of abortion. Moderate to high levels of pressure were reported from the male partner (48%), family members (37%), other persons (33%), financial pressures (69%) and other circumstances (77%).  Ninety-one percent reported moderate to high levels of pressure to abort on at least one scale.  Pressure to abort was positively correlated with all negative outcomes investigated, including a self-attributed decline in mental health. The worst of negative reactions occurred immediately after their abortions for 35%, while 40% reported delayed negative reactions, including the 15% who stated that the worst effects “continue to persist, even today” an average of twenty years later.

Discussion: Most Canadian women with a history of abortion felt pressured to abort contrary to their own values and preferences. Negative reactions manifest in numerous ways, but all are associated with feeling pressured to abort.  The pressures Canadian women face are similar to those reported by American women with the exception that they are somewhat more likely to feel pressured to abort by their male partners.

Other

Keywords: post-abortion mental health, post-abortion adjustments, risk factors, health policy, reproductive rights, mental health, abortion

Files

Unwanted Ab Canada v3.pdf

Files (961.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:d6dea38fe99f34e954e1b34fabe2487e
961.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Major B, Appelbaum M, Beckman L, Dutton MA, Russo NF, West C. Report of the APA Task Force on Mental Health and Abortion. American Psychological Association; 2008. 2. Rue VM, Coleman PK, Rue JJ, Reardon DC. Induced abortion and traumatic stress: A preliminary comparison of American and Russian women. Medical Science Monitor. 2004;10(10):SR5-SR16. 3. Reardon DC. The abortion and mental health controversy: A comprehensive literature review of common ground agreements, disagreements, actionable recommendations, and research opportunities. SAGE Open Med. 2018;6:205031211880762. doi:10.1177/2050312118807624 4. Broen AN, Moum T, Bödtker AS, Ekeberg Ö. Reasons for induced abortion and their relation to women's emotional distress: a prospective, two-year follow-up study. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2005;27(1):36-43. doi:10.1016/J.GENHOSPPSYCH.2004.09.009 5. Reardon DC, Longbons T. Effects of Pressure to Abort on Women's Emotional Responses and Mental Health. Cureus. 2023;15(1):e34456. doi:10.7759/cureus.34456 6. Reardon DC, Rafferty KA, Longbons T, Reardon DC, Rafferty KA, Longbons T. The Effects of Abortion Decision Rightness and Decision Type on Women's Satisfaction and Mental Health. Cureus. 2023;15(5). doi:10.7759/CUREUS.38882 7. Burke T, Reardon DC. Forbidden Grief: The Unspoken Pain of Abortion. Acorn Books; 2007. 8. Reardon DC. The abortion and mental health controversy: A comprehensive literature review of common ground agreements, disagreements, actionable recommendations, and research opportunities. SAGE Open Med. 2018;6:205031211880762. doi:10.1177/2050312118807624 9. Reardon DC. The Embrace of the Pro-Abortion Turnaway Study. Wishful Thinking? or Willful Deceptions? Linacre Q. 2018;85(3):204-212. doi:10.1177/0024363918782156 10. Tierney KI. Abortion Underreporting in Add Health: Findings and Implications. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2019;38(3):417-428. doi:10.1007/S11113-019-09511-8 11. Jones RK, Jerman J. Population Group Abortion Rates and Lifetime Incidence of Abortion: United States, 2008–2014. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(12):1904-1909. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2017.304042