Published September 26, 2008
| Version 6663
Journal article
Open
Process-Oriented Learning Requirements for Employees and for Organizations
Authors/Creators
Description
Using activity theory, organisational theory and
didactics as theoretical foundations, a comprehensive model of the
organisational dimensions relevant for learning and knowledge
transfer will be developed. In a second step, a Learning Assessment
Guideline will be elaborated. This guideline will be designed to
permit a targeted analysis of organisations to identify the status quo
in those areas crucial to the implementation of learning and
knowledge transfer. In addition, this self-analysis tool will enable
learning managers to select adequate didactic models for e- and
blended learning. As part of the European Integrated Project
"Process-oriented Learning and Information Exchange" (PROLIX),
this model of organisational prerequisites for learning and knowledge
transfer will be empirically tested in four profit and non-profit
organisations in Great Britain, Germany and France (to be finalized
in autumn 2006). The findings concern not only the capability of the
model of organisational dimensions, but also the predominant
perceptions of and obstacles to learning in organisations.
Files
6663.pdf
Files
(451.9 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:65dde2275ef5300d3e58e42097ccf910
|
451.9 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Billett, Stephen, 2001: Learning through work: workplace affordances and individual engagement, Journal of Workplace Learning, 13 No. 5, S. 209 - 214.
- Bornemann, Manfred; Sammer, Martin, 2003: Assessment methodology to prioritize knowledge management related activities to support organizational excellence, Measuring Business Excellence, 7 No. 2, S. 21 - 28.
- Cegarra, Juan G.; Sabater, Ramon, 2005: E-learning: organizational requirements for successful feedback learning, 5/6, The Journal of Workplace Learning, 17, S. 276 - 290.
- Engeström, Yrjö, 2001: Expansive Learning at Work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization, Journal of Education and Work, 14, No. 1, S. 133 - 155.
- European KM Forum 2002: KM Assessment Model and Tool, http://www.knowledgeboard.com [14. 4. 2006].
- Jonassen, David H.; Rohrer-Murphy, Lucia, 1999: Activity Theory as a Framework for Designing Constructivist Learning Environments, Educational Technology, Research and Development, 47, No. 1, S. 61 - 79.
- Lave, Jean; Wenger, Etienne, 1991: Situated learning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Malhotra, Yogesh, 2000: Knowledge management for E-business performance, InformationStrategy: The Executives Journal, 16, No. 4, S. 5 - 16.
- Mertins, Kai; Heisig, Peter; Vorbeck, Jens, 2001: Knowledge Management - Best Practices in Europe, Berlin: Springer. [10] Mingers, Susanne, 1999: Wissensmanagement praktisch - Handlungsfelder rund um die Grundpfeiler des Unternehmens, Hernsteiner, 8/99. [11] Nardi, Bonnie A., 2006: Studying Context: A Comparison of Activity Theory, Situated Action Models, and Distributed Cognition, in: Nardi, Bonnie A. (Hrsg.): Nardi, B. (ed). (1996): Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, MIT Press, Cambridge: MIT Press , S. 35 - 52. [12] Wiig, Karl M., 2004: People-Focused Knowledge Management, Burlington, MA: Elsevier.