Data for: What you have, not who you know: food-enhanced social capital and changes in social behavioural relationships in a non-human primate
Creators
- 1. University of California, Davis
- 2. Emory University
- 3. Central European University - Budapest Campus
Description
Social network position in non-human primates has far-reaching fitness consequences. Critically, social networks are both heterogenous and dynamic, meaning an individual's current network position is likely to change due to both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. However, our understanding of the drivers of changes in social network position is largely confined to opportunistic studies. Experimental research on the consequences of in situ, controlled network perturbations is limited. Here we conducted a food-based experiment in rhesus macaques to assess whether allowing an individual the ability to provide high-quality food to her group changed her social behavioural relationships. We considered both her social network position across five behavioural networks, as well as her dominance and kin interactions. We found that gaining control over a preferential food resource had far-reaching social consequences. There was an increase in both submission and aggression centrality and changes in the socio-demographic characteristics of her agonistic interaction partners. Further, we found that her grooming balance shifted in her favour as she received more grooming than she gave. Together, these results provide a novel, preliminary insight into how in situ, experimental manipulations can modify social network position and point to broader network-level shifts in both social capital and social power.
Notes
Methods
Data collection:
Data were collected on a single group of Rhesus macaques. Behavioural observations were conducted all adult individuals (3+ years) in the group. Affiliative and agonistic interactions were recorded.
Data processing:
Behavioural observations were used to construct a weighted, directed behavioural network for each of the following behaviours, for both baseline and experimental phases separately: (1) dyadic aggressive interactions where aggressive behaviour was met with a clear submissive response, (2) approach – move away interactions, such as displacements, (3) SBT signals in response to peaceful approaches (note: peaceful SBTs may be accompanied by other submissive behaviours including turn away, move away. or rump present), and (4) social grooming interactions. Weighted, undirected networks were constructed for huddling/social contact and proximity interactions. For directed behaviours, indegree, outdegree (the number of adjacent edges to each node), and strength (total number of interactions) were calculated, while degree centrality was calculated for undirected networks.
Dominance ranks were calculated from agonistic interactions for all adult individuals using the Perc package.