There is a newer version of the record available.

Published December 31, 2023 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Experiment on Inverted Fractal Corresponds with Cosmological Observations and Conjectures

Contributors

Contact person:

Description

In a recent paper—The Fractal Corresponds to Light and Quantum Foundation Problems—the author described the forward-looking progressive perspective of a fractal. In this paper the author modelled the complementary and dual perspective of the same fractal: its retrospective perspective, this time it pertaining specifically to cosmology. Recent discussions as to whether the universe is fractal concluded with the 2012 WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey findings in (part) agreement with fractal-cosmology proponents that the small-scale observable universe is fractal; however, beyond this, the smooth large-scale—and thus the universe—is not fractal. Is this smoothness and other ΛCDM properties what one would expect to observe (within) if the universe is a fractal? Current fractal-cosmology models seek repeating patterns of larger scale further out. Though these structures have since been found in the smooth; in this paper the growth from the perspective within a growing fractal was modelled. An experiment was conducted on a ‘simple’ (Koch snowflake) fractal. New triangle sizes of arbitrary size were held constant and earlier triangles were allowed to expand as the fractal set iterated (grew). Classical kinematic equations—velocity and acceleration—were calculated for the total area total and the distance between arbitrary points. Hubble-Lemaitre’s Law, accelerated expansion, and changing size distribution, all corresponding to cosmological observations and conjectures were tested for. Results showed: the area expanded exponentially from an arbitrary starting size; and as a consequence, the distances between measured points—from any location within the set—receded away from the ‘observer’ at increasing velocities and accelerations. It was concluded, the universe is not only fractal, but that it is a fractal. At the expense of the cosmological principle, the fractal is a geometrical match to the cosmological observations and conjectures, able to demonstrate the inflation epoch, Hubble-Lemaitre and accelerated expansion. The large-scale smoothness is a property of a growing fractal and is expected. From this model— from planet Earth— we are observing within ‘the branches’ looking out and back in time to ‘the boughs’ (the large quasar structures) and ‘the trunk’ (the CMB—which was once seedling sized Planck area size) of a fractal shaped universe. Other problems—including the horizon problem and the vacuum catastrophe—were addressed. Based on a previous work on the quantum with the fractal, the fractal may offer a direct mechanism to marrying quantum problems with cosmological problems—unifying the two realities as being two aspects of the same modern geometry.

Files

IJQF Fractal Cosmology.pdf

Files (4.7 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:a670b6f0af4ad21b124c2b8956429e5a
4.7 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Hubble E, Humason ML. The Velocity-Distance Relation among Extra-Galactic Nebulae. Astrophys J. 1931;74: 43. doi:10.1086/143323
  • Lemaître G. Expansion of the universe, A homogeneous universe of constant massandincreasing radius accounting for the radial velocity of extra-galactic nebulae. Mon Not RAstronSoc. 1931;91: 483–490.
  • Penzias AA, Wilson RW. A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080Mc/s. Astrophys J. 1965;142: 419–421. doi:10.1086/148307
  • Perlmutter S, Aldering G, Goldhaber G, Knop RA, Nugent P, Castro PG, et al. Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae. Astrophys J. 1999;517: 565–586. doi:10.1086/307221
  • Riess AG, Filippenko AV, Challis P, Clocchiattia A, Diercks A, Garnavich PM, et al. Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant. AstronJ. 1998;116: 1009–1038. doi:10.1086/300499
  • Peacock JA, Cole S, Norberg P, Baugh CM, Bland-Hawthorn J, Bridges T, et al. A measurement ofthe cosmological mass density from clustering in the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey. Nature. 2001;410: 169–173. doi:10.1038/35065528
  • Scrimgeour M, Davis T, Blake C, James JB, Poole G, Staveley-Smith L, et al. The WiggleZDarkEnergy Survey: the transition to large-scale cosmic homogeneity. Mon Not RAstronSoc. 2012;425: 116–134. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21402.x
  • Mandelbrot BB. FRACTAL ASPECTS OF THE ITERATION OF z →Λz(1- z) FOR COMPLEXΛANDz. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1980;357: 249–259. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb29690.x
  • Pietronero L. The fractal structure of the universe: Correlations of galaxies and clusters andtheaverage mass density. Phys Stat Mech Its Appl. 1987;144: 257–284. doi:10.1016/0378-4371(87)90191-9
  • Joyce M, Labini FS, Gabrielli A, Montuori M, Pietronero L. Basic properties of galaxy clusteringinthe light of recent results from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Astron Astrophys. 2005;443: 11–16. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053658
  • Nottale L, Vigier JP. Continuous increase of Hubble modulus behind clusters of galaxies. Nature. 1977;268: 608–610. doi:10.1038/268608a0
  • Dickau JJ. Fractal cosmology. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2009;41: 2103–2105. doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2008.07.056
  • LAURENT N. THE THEORY OF SCALE RELATIVITY. 1991. Available: http://luth.obspm.fr/~luthier/nottale/arIJMP2.pdf
  • Hogg DW, Eisenstein DJ, Blanton MR, Bahcall NA, Brinkmann J, Gunn JE, et al. Cosmichomogeneity demonstrated with luminous red galaxies. Astrophys J. 2005;624: 54–58. doi:10.1086/429084
  • Yadav J, Bharadwaj S, Pandey B, Seshadri TR. Testing homogeneity on large scales intheSloanDigital Sky Survey Data Release One. Mon Not R Astron Soc. 2005;364: 601–606. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09578.x
  • Clowes RG, Harris KA, Raghunathan S, Campusano LE, Soechting IK, GrahamMJ. Astructureinthe early universe at z ~ 1.3 that exceeds the homogeneity scale of the R-Wconcordancecosmology. Mon Not R Astron Soc. 2013;429: 2910–2916. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts497
  • Horvath I, Bagoly Z, Hakkila J, Toth LV. New data support the existence of the Hercules-CoronaBorealis Great Wall. Astron Astrophys. 2015;584: A48. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424829
  • Stephenson NL, Das AJ, Condit R, Russo SE, Baker PJ, Beckman NG, et al. Rate of tree carbon accumulation increases continuously with tree size. Nature. 2014;507: 90–93. doi:10.1038/nature12914
  • Hubble E. A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae. ProcNatl Acad Sci. 1929;15: 168–173. doi:10.1073/pnas.15.3.168
  • Guth AH. Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems. PhysRev D. 1981;23: 347–356. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.23.347
  • Wendel G, Martínez L, Bojowald M. Physical Implications of a Fundamental Period of Time. PhysRev Lett. 2020;124: 241301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.241301
  • Colin J, Mohayaee R, Rameez M, Sarkar S. Evidence for anisotropy of cosmic acceleration. AstronAstrophys. 2019;631: L13. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936373
  • A possible large-scale alignment of galaxy spin directions — Analysis of 10 datasets fromSDSS, Pan-STARRS, and HST. New Astron. 2022;95: 101819. doi:10.1016/j.newast.2022.101819
  • Nottale L. Scale relativity and fractal space-time: theory and applications. Found Sci. 2010;15: 101–152. doi:10.1007/s10699-010-9170-2
  • Nottale L. FRACTAL SPACE-TIME AND MICROPHYSICS Towards a Theory of Scale Relativity. World Sci. 1993; 283–307.
  • Rozgacheva IK, Agapov AA. The fractal cosmological model. ArXiv11030552 Astro-Ph. 2011[cited 27 Nov 2014]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.0552
  • Bojowald M. Quantum cosmology: a review. Rep Prog Phys. 2015;78: 023901. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/2/023901