STEREOTYPE THREAT AND PERFORMANCE: PSYCHOLOGICAL MECHANISM
Authors/Creators
Description
Abstract
Research indicating that the activation of negative stereotypes can hinder the performance of individuals facing social stigmatization across a broad spectrum of tasks has significantly increased. Despite this proliferation of studies, a comprehensive comprehension of the mechanisms that drive these effects on behavior in the context of stereotype threat is still incomplete. This literature review systematically explores the intricate psychological mechanisms underlying stereotype threat and its impact on performance across diverse domains. Stereotype threat, characterized by the awareness of negative stereotypes associated with one's social group, induces anxiety and apprehension, potentially hindering individual performance. Drawing on a comprehensive analysis of studies from psychology, education, and social science, this review provides an in-depth understanding of the nuanced dynamics of stereotype threat. The review commences with a precise definition and contextualization of stereotype threat, emphasizing its pervasive influence in academic, sports, and workplace environments. Factors such as cognitive interference, self-regulation depletion, and heightened physiological arousal emerge as pivotal contributors influencing task performance under stereotype threat. Furthermore, the review systematically explores the moderating role of individual differences, including trait anxiety, self-esteem, and domain identification, in shaping the impact of stereotype threat. This nuanced examination enhances comprehension of specific conditions under which individuals are most susceptible to stereotype threat. The synthesis of empirical findings extends to the discussion of potential mitigating factors and interventions designed to alleviate the adverse effects of stereotype threat. Strategies such as educational interventions, exposure to positive role models, and affirmation of values within threatened groups emerge as promising approaches to counteract the detrimental impact of stereotype threat. In conclusion, this comprehensive review critically assesses existing research on stereotype threat and its psychological mechanisms
Other
References:
1. Cadinu, M., Maass, A., Frigerio, S., Impagliazzo, L., & Latinotti, S. (2003). Stereotype threat: The effect of expectancy on performance. European journal of social psychology, 33(2), 267-285.
2. Cokley, K., Smith, L., Bernard, D., Hurst, A., Jackson, S., Stone, S., & Awosogba, O. (2011). Impostor feelings as a moderator and mediator of the relationship between perceived discrimination and mental health among racial/ethnic minority college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(4), 543–554.
3. Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women's leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 276–287.
4. Derks, B., Inzlicht, M., & Kang, S. (2008). The neuroscience of stigma and stereotype threat. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11(2), 163-181.
5. Devine, P. G., & Brodish, A. B. (2003). Modern classics in social psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 14(3/4), 196-202.
6. Hess, T. M., Emery, L., & Queen, T. L. (2009). Task demands moderate stereotype threat effects on memory performance. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64(4), 482-486.
7. Inzlicht, M., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11(5), 365–371.
8. Purdie-Vaughns, V., Steele, C. M., Davies, P. G., Ditlmann, R., & Crosby, J. R. (2008). Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 615–630.
9. Rosenthal, H. E., Crisp, R. J., & Suen, M. W. (2007). Improving performance expectancies in stereotypic domains: Task relevance and the reduction of stereotype threat. European journal of social psychology, 37(3), 586-597.
10. Schmader, T. (2002). Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 194–201.
11. Sekaquaptewa, D., & Thompson, M. (2003). Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women’s performance. Journal of experimental social psychology, 39(1), 68-74.
12. Spelke, E. S. (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science?: a critical review. American psychologist, 60(9), 950.
13. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 4–28.
14. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629.
15. Steele, C. M. (2010). Whistling Vivaldi: How stereotypes affect us and what we can do. W. W. Norton & Company.
16. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811.
17. Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Kidd, K. K. (2005). Intelligence, race, and genetics (Vol. 60, No. 1, p. 46). American Psychological Association.
18. Stone, J., & McWhinnie, C. (2008). Evidence that blatant versus subtle stereotype threat cues impact performance through dual processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 445-452.
Files
DSJ_79-61-66.pdf
Files
(210.4 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:9552325018d71332cf5fa0c3d558b8f7
|
210.4 kB | Preview Download |