Published December 21, 2023 | Version v1
Journal article Open

An updated Atlas of Helophorus chromosomes

Authors/Creators

  • 1. The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom

Description

An account is given of my development of techniques to obtain well-spread Giemsa-stained banded chromosome preparations. Apparent G-banding could be obtained following very slight trypsin treatment of freshly prepared slides, but this banding was very fine (close-grained) and possibly not a reflection of chromosome structure. However, treatment of developing embryos in vitro with 5-fluorouridine produced a similar chromomere banding, which is therefore regarded as genuine. Steady accumulation of Helophorus Fabricius, 1775 karyotypes has resulted in the production of an Atlas covering 62 of the 170 species known to occur in the Palaearctic. Chromosome polymorphisms involving pericentric inversions and addition of extra C-banding regions have been found, as well as small B-chromosomes in a few species. In general, karyotypes have proved very useful in establishing the limits of individual species. Parthenogenesis involving triploidy has been found in two species. Karyotypes of experimentally produced hybrids have revealed irregularities in chromosome condensation.

Files

CCG_article_112831.pdf

Files (3.0 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:f51f65017eda6156ac026d7e1468c17b
3.0 MB Preview Download

System files (244.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:48363a2f307bf9087c762974f802d2ea
244.4 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Angus RB (1970a) A revision of the beetles of the Genus Helophorus F. (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) subgenera Orpheloporus d'Orchymont, Gephelophorus Sharp and Meghelophorus Kuwert. Acta Zoologica Fennica 129: 1–62
  • Angus RB (1970b) Revisional studies on East Palaearctic and some Nearctic species of Helophorus F. (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Ergebnisse der Zoologischen Forschungen von Dr. Z. Kaszab in der Mongolei (No. 226). Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientarum Hugaricae 16: 249–290.
  • Angus RB (1970c) Helophorus orientalis (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae), a parthenogenetic water beetle from Siberia and North America, and a British Pleistocene fossil. Canadian Entomologist 102: 129–143. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent102129-2
  • Angus RB (1982) Separation of two species standing as Helophorus aquaticus (L.) (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae) by banded chromosome analysis. Systematic Entomology 7: 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.1982.tb00444.x
  • Angus RB (1983) Separation of Helophorus grandis, maritimus and occidentalis sp. n. (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae) by banded chromosomal analysis. Systematic Entomology 8: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.1983.tb00462.x
  • Angus RB (1985) K Revizii Palearkticheskikh Vodolyubov roda Helophorus F. (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). 2. Entomologicheskoye Obozrenie 4: 716–747 . English version: Towards a Revision of the Palaearctic Species of Helophorus F. (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). 2. Entomological Review 4: 128–162.
  • Angus RB (1989) Towards an atlas of Helophorus chromosomes. Balfour-Browne Club Newsletter 44: 13–22.
  • Angus RB (1986) Revision of the Palaearctic species of the Helophorus minutus group (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae), with chromosome analysis and hybridization experiments. Systematic Entomology 11: 133–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.1986.tb00173.x
  • Angus RB (1992a) Insecta Coleoptera Hydrophilidae Helophorinae. Süßwasserfauna von Mitteleuropa 20/10-2. Jena, 144 pp.
  • Angus RB (1992b) A chromosomal investigation of Helophorus brevipalpis Bedel (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae), with triploid Spanish females a possible source of American parthenogenetic material. The Entomologist 111: 56–60.
  • Angus RB (1996) A re-evaluation of the Helophorus flavipes group of species (Coleoptera, Hydrophiloidea), based on chromosomal analysis, larvae and biology. Nouvelle Revue d'Entomologie (n. s. ) 13: 111–122.
  • Angus RB (1998) Helophorus pallidipennis Mulsant & Wachanru and H. kervillei d'Orchymont as good species. (Coleoptera: Helophoridae). Koleopteroplogische Rundschau 68: 189–196.
  • Angus RB (2015) Some Helophorus karyotypes. Latissimus 36: 2–3.
  • Angus RB (2019) Once more in the Middle Kingdom! Latissimus 44: 1–6.
  • Angus RB, Diaz Pazos JA (1990) Helophorus jocoteroi n. sp., from Northwest Spain. Nouvelle Revue d'Entomologie (N. S. ) 7: 419–422.
  • Angus RB, Jia F, Chen Z-N, Zhang Y, Vondráček D, Fikáček M (2016) Taxonomy, larval morphology and cytogenetics of Lihelophorus, the Tibetan endemic subgenus of Helophorus (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 56(1): 109–148.
  • Angus RB, Jia F (2020) Triploidy in Chinese parthenogenetic Helophorus orientalis Motschulsky, 1860, further data on parthenogenetic H. brevipalpis Bedel, 1891 and a brief discussion of parthenogenesis in Hydrophiloidea (Coleoptra). Comparative Cytogenetics 14(1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3897/CompCytogen.v14i1.47656
  • Angus RB, Litovkin SV, Jia F (2019) Notes on Helophorus (s. str.) kozlovi Zaitzev, 1908, with description of two new species, re-evaluation of Helophorus s. str. Fabricius 1775 and Trichohelophorus Kuwert, 1886, and revised keys to the subgenera of Helophorus and to the species of Helophorus s. str. (Coleoptera: Helophoridae). Koleopterologiche Rundschau 89: 127–150.
  • Angus RB, Mahdizadeh S, Hosseinie SO (2005) A re-evaluation of the Helophorus leontis complex (Coleoptera: Helophoridae) based on chromosomal analysis, with description of H. biltoni sp. nov. from Iran. Aquatic Insects 27: 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650420500170510
  • Bigger TRL (1975) Karyotypes of some Lepidoptera chromosomes and changes in their holokinetic organization as revealed by new cytological techniques. Caryologia 40: 713–726. https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.40.713
  • Crozier RH (1968) An acetic acid dissociation, air-drying technique for insect chromosomes, with aceto- lactic orcein staining. Stain Technology 43: 171–173. https://doi.org/10.3109/10520296809115063
  • Dutrillaux AM, Moulin S, Dutrillaux B (2006) Use of meiotic pachytene stage of spermatocytes for karyotypic studies in insects. Chromosome Research 14: 549–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-006-1052-7
  • Dutrillaux B, Dutrillaux A-M, McClure M, Elias M, Bed'hom B (2022) Improved basic cytogenetics challenges holocentricity of butterfly chromosomes. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 162(5): 262–272. https://doi.org/10.1159/000526034
  • Giannoulis T, Dutrillaux A-M, Mamuris Z, Montreuil O, Stamatis C, Dutrillaux B (2011) Evolution of European Cockchafers (Melolonthinae: Scarabaeidae: Coleoptera:): a morphological, molecular and chromosomal study of intra- and inter-specific variations. Bulletin of Entomological Research 101: 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485310000568
  • John B, Lewis KR (1960) Nucleolar Controlled segregation of the Sex Chromosomes in Beetles. Heredity: 431–439. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1960.107
  • Juan C, Pons J, Petitpierre E (1993) Localisation of tandemly repeated DNA sequences in beetle chromosomes by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Chromosome Research 1: 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00710770
  • Luciani JM, Morazzini MR, Stahl A (1975) Identification of pachytene bivalents in human male meiosis using G-banding technique. Chromosoma 52: 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00332116
  • Maudlin I (1974) Giemsa banding of metaphase chromosomes in triatomine bugs. Nature 252: 392–393. https://doi.org/10.1038/252392a0
  • Millán A, Sánchez-Fernández D, Abellán P, Picazo F, Carbonell JA, Lobo JM, Ribera I (2014) Atlas de los Coleopteros Acuáticos de España Peninsular. Madrid, 819 pp.
  • O'Brien SJ, Nash WG, Wildt DE, Bush ME, Beneveniste RE (1985) A molecular solution to the riddle of the giant panda's phylogeny. Nature 317: 140–144. https://doi.org/10.1038/317140a0
  • Pearson PL (1997) Banding Patterns, Chromosome Polymorphism, and Primate Evolution. Chapter 8. In: Yunis JJ (Ed.) Molecular Structure of Human Chromosomes, New York, 267–293. [326 pp.] https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-775168-9.50013-0
  • Rønne M (1977) In vitro induction of G bands with cycloheximide. Hereditas 86: 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1977.tb01217.x
  • Rønne M, Andersen O (1978) Effect of 5-fluorouracil and 5-fluorouridine on metaphase structure in human lymphoid cells. Hereditas 88: 127–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1978.tb01612.x
  • Rothfels KH, Siminovitch L (1958) An air-drying technique for flattening chromosomes in mammalian cells grown in vitro. Stain Technology 13(2): 73–77. https://doi.org/10.3109/10520295809111827
  • Shaarawi FAI, Angus RB (1992) Chromosomal analysis of some European species of the genera Georissus Latreille, Spercheus Illiger and Hydrochus Leach (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea). Koleopterologische Rundschau 62: 127–135.
  • Shaarawi FAI, Angus RB (1991) A chromosomal investigation of five European species of Anacaena Thomson (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). Entomoligica Scandinavica 21: 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1163/187631290X00319
  • Simon J-C, Delmotte F, Rispe C, Crease T (2003) Phylogenetic relationships between parthenogens and their sexual relatives: the possible routes to parthenogenesis in animals. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 79: 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00175.x
  • Smith SG (1960) Chromosome numbers of Coleoptera, 2. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 2: 66–68. https://doi.org/10.1139/g60-007