Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published June 3, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article Open

A ready-to-use dose-response model of Campylobacter jejuni implemented in the FSKX-standard

Authors/Creators

  • 1. German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany
  • 2. Technical University of Denmark, National Food Institute (DTU Food), Kemitorvet, Denmark
  • 3. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands

Description

Dose-response models are an important part of quantitative microbiological risk assessments. In this paper, we present a transparent and ready-to-use version of a published dose-response model that estimates the probability of infection and illness after the consumption of a meal that is contaminated with the pathogen Campylobacter jejuni. To this end, model and metadata are implemented in the fskx-standard. The model parameter values are based on data from a set of different studies on the infectivity and pathogenicity of Campylobacter jejuni. Both, challenge studies and outbreaks are considered, users can decide which of these is most suitable for their purpose. We present examples of results for typical ingested doses and demonstrate the utility of our ready-to-use model re-implementation by supplying an executable model embedded in this manuscript.

Files

FESMJ_article_63309.pdf

Files (526.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:fef783ca79a48ca0f63a47c0d487f087
415.9 kB Preview Download
md5:175bbf5cb1705c2c0ce2dca440738438
110.4 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Cites
Publication: 10.1093/infdis/157.3.472 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.mran.2016.07.001 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.mran.2018.09.001 (DOI)
Publication: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2105 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.mran.2018.06.001 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/risa.12214 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.12.001 (DOI)
Publication: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00200 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/0272-4332.204048 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1017/s0950268805003912 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.epidem.2018.02.001 (DOI)
Has part
Figure: 10.3897/fmj..63309.figure4 (DOI)
Figure: 10.3897/fmj..63309.figure2 (DOI)
Figure: 10.3897/fmj..63309.figure3 (DOI)
Figure: 10.3897/fmj..63309.figure1 (DOI)
Other: 10.3897/fmj..63309.suppl1 (DOI)
Figure: https://zenodo.org/record/6355750 (URL)
Figure: https://zenodo.org/record/6355736 (URL)
Figure: https://zenodo.org/record/6355746 (URL)
Figure: https://zenodo.org/record/6355730 (URL)
Other: https://zenodo.org/record/6355732 (URL)

References

  • Black RE, Levine MM, Clements ML, Hughes TP, Blaser MJ (1988) Experimental Campylobacter jejuni infection in humans. Journal of Infectious diseases 157 (3): 472‑479. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/157.3.472
  • Chapman B, Otten A, Fazil A, Ernst N, Smith BA (2016) A review of quantitative microbial risk assessment and consumer process models for Campylobacter in broiler chickens. Microbial Risk Analysis 2-3: 3‑15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mran.2016.07.001
  • Codex Alimentarius Commission (1999) Principles and guidelines for the conduct of microbiological risk assessment. In: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, World Health Organization (Eds) International Food Standards. CAC/GL-30. Rome, Italy.
  • de Alba Aparicio M, Buschhardt T, Swaid A, Valentin L, Mesa-Varona O, Günther T, Plaza-Rodriguez C, Filter M (2018) FSK-Lab – An open source food safety model integration tool. Microbial Risk Analysis 10: 13‑19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mran.2018.09.001
  • EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (2011) Scientific opinion on Campylobacter in broiler meat production: control options and performance objectives and/or targets at different stages of the food chain. EFSA Journal 9 (4): 2105. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2105
  • EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards, Koutsoumanis K, Allende A, Alvarez‐Ordóñez A, Bolton D, Bover‐Cid S, Davies R, De Cesare A, Herman L, Hilbert F (2020) Update and review of control options for Campylobacter in broilers at primary production. EFSA Journal 18 (4): 6090.
  • European Food Safety Authority, European Centre for Disease Prevention Control (2019) The European Union one health 2018 zoonoses report. EFSA Journal 17 (12). URL: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/5926
  • German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (2019) https://www.bfr.bund.de/cm/350/feed-and-food-safety-in-times-of-global-production-and-trade.pdf
  • Haberbeck LU, Plaza-Rodriguez C, Desvignes V, Dalgaard P, Sanaa M, Guillier L, Nauta M, Filter M (2018) Harmonized terms, concepts and metadata for microbiological risk assessment models: The basis for knowledge integration and exchange. Microbial Risk Analysis 10: 3‑12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mran.2018.06.001
  • Havelaar AH, Swart AN (2014) Impact of acquired immunity and dose-dependent probability of illness on quantitative microbial risk assessment. Risk Analysis 34 (10): 1807‑19. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12214
  • Nauta M, Hill A, Rosenquist H, Brynestad S, Fetsch A, van der Logt P, Fazil A, Christensen B, Katsma E, Borck B (2009) A comparison of risk assessments on Campylobacter in broiler meat. International Journal of Food Microbiology 129 (2): 107‑123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.12.001
  • Silva J, Leite D, Fernandes M, Mena C, Gibbs P, Teixeira P (2011) Campylobacter spp. as a foodborne pathogen: A review. Frontiers in Microbiology 2 (200). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2011.00200
  • Swart A, Havelaar A (2012) Analyse monitoring data 'convenant Campylobacter aanpak pluimveevlees in Nederland'. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu RIVM. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10029/261559
  • Teunis PFM, Havelaar AH (2000) The beta Poisson dose-response model is not a single-hit model. Risk Analysis 20 (4): 513‑20. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.204048
  • Teunis PFM, Van den Brandhof W, Nauta M, Wagenaar J, Van den Kerkhof H, Van Pelt W (2005) A reconsideration of the Campylobacter dose–response relation. Epidemiology & Infection 133 (4): 583‑592. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268805003912
  • Teunis PFM, Bonacic Marinovic A, Tribble DR, Porter CK, Swart A (2018) Acute illness from Campylobacter jejuni may require high doses while infection occurs at low doses. Epidemics 24: 1‑20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2018.02.001
  • World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2003) Hazard characterization for pathogens in food and water: guidelines. Microbiological Risk Assessment Series 3 URL: http://www.fao.org/3/y4666e/y4666e00.htm
  • World Health Organization, Food Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2009) Risk assessment of Campylobacter spp. in broiler chickens: interpretative summary. Microbiological Risk Assessment Series No 11, Geneva, Switzerland. URL: https://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/micro/MRA11_En.pdf
  • World Health Organization (2013) The global view of campylobacteriosis: report of an expert consultation. Utrecht, Netherlands, 9-11 July 2012 URL: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/80751/9789241564601_eng.pdf;jsessionid=4C4696E0E17C189DA6C361F20B78EBFA?sequence=1