Published December 7, 2023 | Version v2
Journal article Open

Detection of the effect of some resistance antibiotics on Staphylococcus aureus isolated from urinary tract infections and molecular investigation of the clfA gene encoding the biofilm

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Diyala Universtity
  • 2. Diyala University

Description

One of the human pathogens that spreads the most is Staphylococcus aureus.  Because of the damage it does to life and, by extension, the economy, it became imperative to ascertain its prevalence and antibiogram in our surroundings in order to implement appropriate management and treatment. Records of microbiological cultures and outcomes of antibiotic sensitivity testing for possible UTI cases.

The results led to the conclusion that every S. aureus isolate tested positive for the clfA gene. The results showed resistance to Benzylpenicillin 100%, oxacillin 100%, gentamicin 40%, tobramycin 40%, levofloxacin 80%, erythromycin 100%, clindamycin 100%, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 60%, and tetracycline 60% acid at 80%. In other words, Staphylococcus aureus in UTI is resistant to most antibiotics, and the best antibiotic used during the study, bacteria sensitive to it is gentamicin, which is considered the lowest percentage of resistance compared to the rest of the antibiotics used during the current study.

Keywords: 

Staphylococcus0aureus, VITEK, Antibiotic, Resistance, clfA

Files

3 Detection of the effect of some resistance.pdf

Files (1.3 MB)

Additional details

References

  • 1. Al-Khafaji, Zahra Mahmoud (2008), Microbial Biotechnology, (Techniques Molecular), Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology for Graduate Studies. University of Baghdad.
  • 2. Al-Qaisi, Ibrahim Nawaf Saud, behind Jassem Muhammad Al-Dulaimi and Nawaf, Azal Ibrahim, (2007) The role of plasmids in the resistance of Salmonella bacteria to some antibiotics. Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Volume (5), Issue (1).
  • 3. Al-Saadi, Adel Obeid Hassouni, Abbas Fadel, Riyadh Ghazar and Saadi Republic (2014), Extraction and purification of fibronectin-binding protein from Staphylococcus aureus. Babylon University Journal, Pure Sciences and Applied, Issue (3), Volume (22).
  • 4. AL-Sheikh, E, B. N, and Yosif, H.S. (2014). Smdy the effect of Lysostaphin, Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) biofilm formñtion. J. Scien. 55(1):93-100.
  • 5. Al-Toumi, Abdel-Razzaq Suleiman, Al-Imam, Muhammad Muhammad, Abu Zweida, Abdel-Basit Ramadan (2013), the basics of clinical laboratory bacteriological diagnosis. Biotechnology Research Center.
  • 6. Ando E, Monden K, Mitsuhata R, Kariyama R, Kumon H. Biofilm formation among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from patients with urinary tract infection. Acta Med Okayama. 2004; 58(4):207-14.
  • 7. Brooks, G.F.; Caroll, K.C.; Butel, J.S. and Mores, S.A. Maietmer, T.A. (2010). Jawets, Melnik and Adelberg's Medical Microbiology.25th.ed. The McGraw- Hill companies.
  • 8. Drinkovic D, Fuller ER, Shore KP, Holland DJ, Ellis-Pegler R. Clindamycin treatment of Staphylococcus aureus expressing inducible clindamycin resistance, J Antimicrob Chemother, 2001, vol. 48 (pg. 315-6)
  • 9. Eyoh AB, Toukam M, Atashili J, Fokunang C, Gonsu H, Lyonga EE, et al. Relationship between multiple drug resistance and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from medical and non-medical personnel in Yaounde, Cameroon. Pan Afr Med J. 2014; 17
  • 10. Forbes, B.; sahm. D. and Weissfeld, A. (2007). Diagnostic microbiology.12th e & Elsevier,Pheladelphia, USA.
  • 11. Frieden, T. (2013). Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2013. Òirector, U.S. Centers for Disease Conkol and Prevention. United States House of Representative.
  • 12. George, B.; Kaur, C.; Khurdiya, D.; Kapoor, H. Antioxidants in tomato (Lycopersium esculentum) as a function of genotype. Food Chem. 2004, 84, 45–51.
  • 13. Janštová, B; Necidová, L and Janitová, B. (2012). Comparing the growth of S. aweus and production of Staphylococcal enterotoxin c in sheep's and goat's milk.
  • 14. Jasim, H. s. (2012). Antibiotic Resistance of Staphylococcus aweus isolated Aom nasal cavity of Health care personnel. j. of med. Baghd. 45: 344-348.
  • 15. Katzung, B.G. (2009). Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 9th edition. section VIII.Chemotheraputic Drugs. Mc Graw Hill Medical. chapter 44: 745-755.
  • 16. Kwiatkowska, B. Maslinska, M. (2012). Macrolide Therapy in Chronic Inflammatory Diseases. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Mediators of Inflammation. Volume 2012, Article ID 636157, 7 pages.
  • 17. Levy H, Diallo S, Tennant SM, Livio S, Sow SO, Tapia M, et al. PCR method to identify Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi, Paratyphi A, and Paratyphi B among Salmonella isolates from the blood of patients with clinical enteric fever. J Clin Microbiol. 2008; 46(5):1861-6.
  • 18. MacFaddin, J.K. (2000). Biochemical test for identification of medical bacteria. 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. Awolters klumer company. Philadelphia Baltimore. New York. London. Buenos Aires. Honk Kong. Sydney. Tokyo.
  • 19. Madigan,M.T.; Martinko, J.M.; Stahl, D.A. and Clark, D.P. (2012). Brock Biology of Microorganisms. 13ed. Benjamin Cummings, 1301 Sansome Street, San Francisco.
  • 20. Maki N. Al-Muaala, Sadeq Yasir Al-Ethari, Abdul Ameer Al-Kraety, Ghani Al-Muhanna. Molecular Detection of Clumping Factor A Gene and Antibiotic Susceptibility Evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated From Urinary Tract Infections. Volume 77, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2. March and April 2022. Pages 573-578
  • 21. Mankin, A.S. (2008). Macrolide myths. Curr Opin Microbiol. 11, (5): 1-14.
  • 22. Murti, K. and U. Kumar, 2011. Antimicrobial Activity of Ficus benghalensis and Ficus racemosa roots L. Am. J. Microbiol., 2:21-24. DOI:10.3844/ajmsp.2011.21.24.