Chlamydotheca incisa Sharpe 1910
Authors/Creators
- 1. Laboratorio de Limnología, Instituto de Biología Experimental (IBE), Universidad Central de Venezuela (UCV). Caracas 1040, Venezuela. Laboratorio de Ecología de Sistemas Acuáticos, Línea de Investigación del Plancton, Instituto de Ecología y Zoología Tropical (IZET), Universidad Central de Venezuela (UCV). Caracas 1053, Venezuela.
- 2. State University of Maringá (UEM), Centre of Biological Sciences (CCB), Centre of Research in Limnology, Ichthyology and Aquaculture (Nupélia). Av. Colombo, 5790. Maringá, PR, Brazil.
- 3. Tecnológico Nacional de México-I. T. Chetumal., Av. Insurgentes 330, Chetumal, 77013 Quintana Roo, México.
- 4. Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, ESPOL, Centro del Agua y Desarrollo Sustentable, Campus Gustavo Galindo, Km. 30.5, Vía Perimetral, Guayaquil 090101, Ecuador. & Departamento de Biología, Facultad Experimental de Ciencias, Universidad del Zulia, Avenida Universidad, Sector Grano de Oro, Maracaibo 4005, Venezuela.
Description
Chlamydotheca incisa (Claus 1892) Sharpe 1910
Chlamydotheca incisa — Martens & Behen 1994: 17; C. incisa — Karanovic 2012: 560.
Synonyms: Pachycypris incisa Claus 1892; Cypris (Eucypris) limbata Wierzejski 1892 (= senior synonym); Eucypris (Chlamydotheca) limbata Wierzejski 1892; Cypris labiata Sars 1901; Chlamydotheca labiata M̧ller 1912 (see Martens & Behen 1994; Meisch et al. 2019).
Type locality: Claus (1892) does not clearly indicate the origin of the material. However, like Sharpe (1910), we suggest that it corresponds to Peitiado Pond (“Laguna de Peitiado”), Córdoba Province, Argentina (see remarks, GN 31°24’49” S, 64°10’52” W). Part of the material is deposited in the ZMC.
In Venezuela: the presence of this species is doubtful (see remarks): DISTRITO CAPITAL —Caracas (Karanovic 2012), probably the record of C. incisa comes from Claus (1892).
Remarks: geographical distribution includes Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay, Peru, and Uruguay (Martens & Behen 1994), and in Italy as an alien invasive species (McKenzie & Moroni 1986; Rossi et al. 2003). Martens & Behen (1994) also indicate doubts about the record of the species in Venezuela. Claus (1892), in the original description of the species, writes: “ Von dieser mit Pachycypris leuckarti nahe verwandten, jedoch an Gr̂sse beträchtlich zuŗckstehenden Art fand ich unter den bei Córdova (Laguna Peitiado) gesammelten Cypriden nur wenige Exemplare, unter den Cypriden Venezuelas wurde dieselbe vermisst ”, emphasizing that this species was absent in the material from Venezuela. Since then, there have been no reports of C. incisa in subsequent studies. Thus, its assignment in Venezuela could be the result of a mistake in the reviews made. In addition, the geographical coordinates provided by Karanovic (2012) for Caracas do not correspond to the locality originally described by Claus (1892) to Strandesia bicuspis var. mucronata, and Chlamydotheca leuckarti var. pallida.
Notes
Files
Files
(2.6 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:ae568d096b6669c0a34e2affb8898858
|
2.6 kB | Download |
System files
(24.2 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:9703069d52b57365bdf0435bd2bec9fb
|
24.2 kB | Download |
Linked records
Additional details
Identifiers
Biodiversity
- Scientific name authorship
- Sharpe
- Kingdom
- Animalia
- Phylum
- Arthropoda
- Order
- Podocopida
- Family
- Cyprididae
- Genus
- Chlamydotheca
- Species
- incisa
- Taxon rank
- species
- Taxonomic concept label
- Chlamydotheca incisa Sharpe, 1910 sec. Scott-Frías, González, Pardo, Torres, Higuti, Cohuo & López, 2023
References
- Claus, C. (1892) Beitrage zur Kenntnis der S ¸ sswasser-Ostracoden: 2. Ueber neue Cypriden S ¸ damerikas nebst Bemerkungen ¸ ber Gattungen und Untergattungen der Cypriden. Arbeiten aus dem Zoologischen Institute der Universitat Wien und der Zoologischen Station in Triest, Tom. X., 196 - 216.
- Sharpe, R. W. (1910) On some Ostracoda, mostly new, in the collection of the United States National Museum. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 38 (1750), 335 - 341. https: // doi. org / 10.5479 / si. 00963801.38 - 1750.335
- Martens, K. & Behen, F. (1994) A checklist of the Recent non-marine ostracods (Crustacea, Ostracoda) from the Inland Waters of South America and adjacent Islands. Travaux Scientifiques du Musee National D'Histoire Naturelle de Luxembourg, 22, 1 - 84.
- Karanovic, I. (2012) Recent freshwater ostracods of the world. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 608 pp. Available from: http: // link. springer. com / 10.1007 / 978 - 3 - 642 - 21810 - 1 (accessed 8 October 2022)
- Wierzejski, A. (1892) S ¸ sswasser-Crustaceen und Rotatorien gesammelt in Argentinien. Anzeiger der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Krakau, 5, 185 - 188.
- Sars, G. O. (1901) Contributions to the knowledge of the freshwater Entomostraca of South America: As shown by artificial hatching from dried material. Part II: Copepoda-Ostracoda. Archiv for Mathematik og Naturvidenskab B, Oslo, 52 pp.
- Meisch, C., Smith, R. J. & Martens, K. (2019) A subjective global checklist of the extant non-marine Ostracoda (Crustacea). European Journal of Taxonomy, 492, 1 - 135. https: // doi. org / 10.5852 / ejt. 2019.492
- McKenzie, K. G. & Moroni, A. (1986) Man as an agent of crustacean passive dispersal via useful plants - exemplified by Ostracoda Ospiti Esteri of the Italian ricefields ecosystem - and implications arising therefrom. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 6 (2), 181 - 198. https: // doi. org / 10.1163 / 193724086 X 00019
- Rossi, V., Benassi, G., Veneri, M., Bellavere, C., Menozzi, P., Moroni, A. & McKenzie, K. G. (2003) Ostracoda of the Italian ricefields thirty years on: new synthesis and hypothesis. Journal of Limnology, 62 (1), 1 - 8. https: // doi. org / 10.4081 / jlimnol. 2003.1