Published November 1, 2023 | Version 2.0

GPT Capabilites for Extracting Tasks From Textual Process Descriptions

  • 1. Technical University of Munich
  • 2. Austrian Center for Digital Production

Description

This dataset provides multiple tables which evaluate the capabilities of GPT 1, GPT 2, GPT 3, GPT 3.5, and GPT 4 regarding the extraction of tasks from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7783492 and PET datasets in model_completeness.zip, model_correctness.xslx and control_evaluation.xlsx.

The performance of the LLMs is measured by calculating a range of similarity metrics:

  • Extracted number of tasks from text vs. extracted number of tasks from Model
  • Semantic Text Similarity: Contextual and Non-Contextual between extracted sets of tasks
  • Semantic Text Similarity: Contextual and Non-Contextual between extracted individual tasks
  • Similarities and Prevalence for length restricted extracted labels
  • Similarities and Prevalence for augmented texts (each text has been paraphrased by 9 different paraphrasing methods)
  • Recall and Precision for the above mentioned datasets
  • Jaccard Index for the above mentioned datasets

This dataset also includes all data collected from a survey (survey_data.ods), which lets users (currently n=40) evaluate how good LLM created models are: https://forms.office.com/e/Y55jyNuPi2?origin=lprLink

Files

model_completeness.zip

Files (746.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:45b7d36f047335a46222b1e341301784
11.0 kB Download
md5:302e728d8ed84ee14cd15489d35604e4
682.0 kB Preview Download
md5:11774b98b7a27719eb0931f9c0e89622
11.2 kB Download
md5:168f7bd6318984fe2134ca1af81c5c34
42.6 kB Download