Predator selection on multicomponent warning signals in an aposematic moth
Authors/Creators
- 1. University of Jyväskylä
- 2. Macquarie University
- 3. University of Helsinki
- 4. University of New England
- 5. Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology
- 6. Western Sydney University
Description
Aposematic prey advertise their unprofitability with conspicuous warning signals that are often composed of multiple color patterns. Many species show intraspecific variation in these patterns even though selection is expected to favor invariable warning signals that enhance predator learning. However, if predators acquire avoidance to specific signal components, this might relax selection on other aposematic traits and explain variability. Here we investigated this idea in the aposematic moth Amata nigriceps that has conspicuous black and orange coloration. The size of the orange spots in the wings is highly variable between individuals, whereas the number and width of orange abdominal stripes remain consistent. We produced artificial moths that varied in the proportion of orange in the wings or the presence of abdominal stripes. We presented these to a natural avian predator, the noisy miner (Manorina melanocephala), and recorded how different warning signal components influenced their attack decisions. When moth models had orange stripes on the abdomen, birds did not discriminate between different wing signals. However, when the stripes on the abdomen were removed, birds chose the model with smaller wing spots. In addition, we found that birds were more likely to attack moths with a smaller number of abdominal stripes. Together, our results suggest that bird predators primarily pay attention to the abdominal stripes of A. nigriceps, and this could relax selection on wing coloration. Our study highlights the importance of considering individual warning signal components if we are to understand how predation shapes selection on prey warning coloration.
Other
Funding provided by: Australian Research Council
Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/05mmh0f86
Award Number: DP190101028
Funding provided by: Jenny ja Antti Wihurin Rahasto
Crossref Funder Registry ID: https://ror.org/01gpyzq83
Award Number:
Methods
We conducted field experiments with wild noisy miners in NSW, Australia, between September 2020 and March 2022. We conducted three different experiments where birds were presented with a choice between two artificial moth models to test their preference for 1) small vs. large orange wing spots when the abdomen was black, 2) small vs. large orange wing spots when the abdomen had stripes, and 3) low vs. high number of abdominal stripes. Bird' choices (which moth model was attacked first) were filmed with small video cameras.
Files
Files
(6.0 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:dab8bc63bed27fa36211262fd0ba1790
|
6.0 kB | Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Is source of
- 10.5061/dryad.xksn02vnf (DOI)