Published March 31, 2023 | Version v1

How to Write a Review Article?

Description

The generation of evidence is an ongoing process  

in  the  field  of  medicine.  Basic  and  clinical  

research have been the pillars of modern medicine  

and  continue  to  be  the  strength  of  a  modern  

medical  practitioner.  With  increasing  number  

of  biomedical  journals  and  therefore  research  

articles being published, staying updated with the  

current evidence is a necessity for the clinician.

One  of  the  five  goals  of  an  Indian  medical  

graduate  as  prescribed  by  the  National  Medical  

Commission  is  to  function  as  a  lifelong  learner  

committed to continuous improvement of skill and  

knowledge [1]. It would be ideal that any topic of  

concern  is  thoroughly  searched,  read,  reviewed  

and analyzed by going through all the literature.  

However, this is easier said than done. This task  

is nothing less than swimming in the middle of an  

ocean with no land in sight.The variability in the  

quality  and  content  of  the  enormous  amount  of  

information available confuses the clinician who  

ends up having more unanswered questions than  

before. It is for such situations that a state of the  

art, reliable, well written review article acts like  

a lifeboat.  

A review article is a comprehensive synthesis of  

published  and  unpublished  material  on  a  topic.  

It is a well planned and well-organized analysis  

of all the literature relevant to a topic of interest  

providing  a  useful  summary  and  answers  to  

the  reader's  doubts  and  questions.  It  facilitates  

the  medical  practitioner  to  take  evidence  based  

clinical judgements and decisions. It is a practical  

solution to the problems of excessive information,  

divergent  views  and  lack  of  consensus  on  a  

topic.  Review  articles  aid  decision  making  in  

clinical   practice   by   summarizing   enormous  

information  available,  in  a  coherent  and  easily  

understandable  form,  thereby  acting  as  guides  

for  practicing  evidence-based  medicine.  They  

facilitate  in  understanding  of  recent  advances,  

complex topics and sub topics, which are not a  

part  of  the  conventional  textbooks.  They  help  

in  the  identification  of  relations,  contradictions,  

controversies and lacunae in the existing literature,  

and provide a direction for future research.

Files

2 how-to-write-a-review-article.pdf

Files (230.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:bdb4766597ad6044c389a04590b9de71
230.2 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • (7) April 2023 | Volume 1 | Issue 2 guideline Examining quantitative data Meta-analysis to obtained pooled estimate of effect Depiction of the meta-analysis in the form of a Forest plot Writing the review Structured and reader friendly presentation of the synthesis PRISMA guidelines must be followed for SR Figure 1: An example of a Forest Plot (Source: Yeung T, et al. Indian Pediatrics, 2021) Conclusion Relevant review articles which are methodologically robust, comprehensive and well written are greatly appreciated by readers. SR are preferred for focused topics whereas, NR are better suited to comprehensive topics. Incorporation of a robust methodology similar to that essential for SR would strengthen the quality of NR. Similarly, SR would improve by incorporating the reader friendly style of presentation of NR. Young researchers as well as practicing clinicians would benefit by following the Steps of writing a review article which can easily be remembered by the simple mnemonic REVIEW - Research Question/ Topic of interest selection, Evidence search, Value assessment, Integration and synthesis of descriptive data, Examining quantitative data and Writing the review. References 1. Medical Council of India. Competency Based Undergraduate Curriculum for the Indian Medical Graduate. 2018. [Last accessed on 2022 Aug 15]. pp. 17. Available from:https://www.nmc.org.in/information-desk/for-colleges/ ug-curriculum/ 2. Mathew JL. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: A guide for beginners. Indian Pediatr. 2022;59:320-30. 3. Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper. Getting your bearings (deciding what the paper is about). BMJ. 1997;315(7102): 243-6. 4. Agarwal N, Dewan P. Writing a review article: Making sense of the jumble. Indian Pediatr. 2016;53:715-20. 5. Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:I4898.INDIAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND BEHAVIORAL PEDIATRICS (8) April 2023 | Volume 1 | Issue 2 Aadarsh Pvt. Ltd. guideline 6. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non-randomised studies in meta-analyses. [Last accessed on 2022 Aug 16]. Available from: https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_ epidemiology/oxford.asp 7. Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions BMJ. 2016;355:i4919. 8. Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529-36. 9. Cochrane Training. RevMan 5. [Last accessed on 2022 Aug 14]. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/online- learning/ core-software/revman/revman-5-download. 10. Yeung T, Jasani B, Shah PS. Steroids for the management of neonates with meconium aspiration syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian Pediatr. 2021;58:370-6. 11. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.