Preprint Open Access
The computer says 'DEBT': Towards a critical sociology of algorithms and algorithmic governance
Henman, Paul
This paper uses Australia’s automated processes to identify and recover social security over-payments as a case study to critically analyze the role of algorithms in government and public administration. The paper analyzes the algorithm in terms of: its performance with respect to its purpose; its role in public administration processes and principles; its impact on citizen-service users; and its role in politics. The paper concludes with a discussion of policy and public administrative principles that can be adopted for public sector governance and accountability with government by algorithm.
Files
(106.5 kB)
| Name | Size | |
|---|---|---|
|
Data_for_Policy_2017_paper_43.pdf
md5:e6e0d8a1db47270f423b09af503a5fc8 |
106.5 kB | Download |
704
298
views
downloads
| All versions | This version | |
|---|---|---|
| Views | 704 | 705 |
| Downloads | 298 | 298 |
| Data volume | 31.7 MB | 31.7 MB |
| Unique views | 652 | 653 |
| Unique downloads | 267 | 267 |
Indexed in
- Publication date:
- September 4, 2017
- DOI:
-
- Keyword(s):
- algorithm welfare fraud social security Australia procedural justice
- Meeting:
- Data for Policy 2017: Government by Algorithm? (Data for Policy), London, 6-7 September 2017
- Communities:
- License (for files):
- Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International