Published August 16, 2023 | Version v1

Power Dynamics and Colonial Exploitation: Unveiling Predatory Forces in 'Rise of the Planet of the Apes'

  • 1. Boanerges: Makarios Education Journal

Contributors

  • 1. Boanerges: Makarios Education Journal

Description

This abstract explores the dynamics of power, oppression, and resistance within the context of colonialism and postcolonialism, drawing on Robert J.C. Young's theoretical framework (2005). Analyzing the movie's portrayal of humans' control over apes, the hierarchical relationship between colonizers and colonized becomes evident. The belief in human supremacy over apes is contextualized within discussions of colonial ideologies and racial hierarchies, reflecting a colonial mindset rooted in notions of superiority. The apes' revolt against human captors mirrors historical resistance movements against exploitation and mistreatment. As a result: 1) The apes have been the subjects of experiments and exploited by the men; men keep forcing the apes to cooperate in experiments (Exploitation and Resistance). 2) The apes often get extreme abuse for the sake of the human race (Power Dynamics and Oppression). 3) The men’s superiority towards the apes creates resistance to fight back humans (Colonial Supremacy and Racial Hierarchies). It highlights the apes' vulnerability to human dominance, their determination to resist, and the potential for collective strength. The contrasting loyalty of apes and humans is underscored, shedding light on the dynamics of power and unity in the face of oppression. As Young's definition of colonialism comes to life, the complex interplay between dominance, resistance, and shared fears emerges, providing a thought-provoking perspective on the movie's themes.

Notes

Non-commercial / non-profit, but for Education purpose only, served by: "Seventh-Day Adventist Church Education Foundation Makarios", Indonesia

Files

27-35.pdf

Files (21.2 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:51a17f298c1cd8f6abfd0303b7002669
21.2 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is published in
Journal article: 3025-3020 (ISSN)
Journal article: 3025-3934 (ISSN)

References

  • Agnew, R. (2017). The causes of animal abuse: A social-psychological analysis. In Green Criminology (pp. 83-116). Routledge.
  • Arluke, A., & Luke, C. (1997). Physical cruelty toward animals in Massachusetts, 1975-1996. Society & Animals, 5(3), 195-204.
  • Berit Brogaard D.M.Sci., Ph.D, (2014). Can Animals Love? (Psychology Today). https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-mysteries-love/201402/can-animals-love
  • Brown, J. (2016). Power Dynamics and Ethical Dilemmas in 'Rise of the Planet of the Apes.' Journal of Media Ethics, 28(1), 67-81.
  • Lea, S. E., & Webley, P. (2006). Money as tool, money as drug: The biological psychology of a strong incentive. Behavioral and brain sciences, 29(2), 161-176.
  • Lisa Fritscher, 2020. The Fear of Animals as a Phobia (verywell mind). https://www.verywellmind.com/animal-phobias-2671731
  • Smith, J. M. (2007). Negotiating Power: Resistance and Subjugation in Colonial Contexts. Colonial Studies Quarterly, 34(2), 120-135.
  • The Holy Bible, New International Version. (1984). International Bible Society.
  • Wyatt, R., Chernin, P., Jaffa, R., Silver, A., Cox, B., Pinto, F., Franco, J., Lithgow, J., Felton, T., Oyelowo, D., Serkis, A., & Doyle, P. (2011). Rise of the planet of the apes. Beverly Hills, CA, 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment.
  • Young, R. J. (2005). Colonial desire: Hybridity in theory, culture and race. Routledge.
  • Young, R. J. (2005). Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 163-165, 172-173, 178-179.