Published September 7, 2023 | Version v1

Brown and white layer pullet hybrids show different fear responses towards humans, but what role does light during incubation play in that?

  • 1. Animals in Science and Society, Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
  • 2. Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Merelbeke, Belgium

Description

Good early life conditions are increasingly recognized as essential to animal welfare later in life. The use of light during incubation might improve coping capacities and welfare in later life in poultry, by more closely approximating chicken natural environments compared to the current conventional incubation in darkness. Previous studies showed that lighted incubation resulted in more lateralized chicks, a more pronounced daily behavior rhythm, earlier onset of melatonin rhythms, and lower stress reactions to various stressors after hatching. Most existing research, however, has been conducted on broilers, and little information on lighted incubation is available for laying hens. In the current research, Dekalb White and ISA Brown eggs were incubated in complete darkness or in a cycle of green 12L:12D throughout incubation, and five fear of human tests were performed on the 387 chickens during the rearing phase. We expected dark-incubated chickens to show stronger fear responses than light-incubated chickens. That was only the case for one of 15 behavior measurements taken during the tests (p < 0.05). In addition, white layer hybrids are known to be flightier and more fearful than brown hybrids. In this study, white chickens indeed showed stronger fear responses than brown chickens in 12 of the 15 behavior measurements (p ≤ 0.002). Furthermore, we expected light during incubation to have stronger effects on white chickens than on brown chickens, because of the stronger transmission of light through white eggshells. However, the interaction between hybrid and incubation was never significant (p ≥ 0.18). Finally, contrary to our expectations, there was no effect of the incubation treatments or the hybrid on plasma corticosterone responses to a manual restraint test (p ≥ 0.36). Since there was a hybrid effect on behavior in this test, it is reasonable to think that behavior reflected coping style, rather than fear level. To conclude, the light regime used in this study does not seem as promising as expected to improve laying hen welfare. Finally, the brown hybrid was usually less fearful than the white hybrid, though there were some exceptions depending on the stressor, and that should be taken into account in research and in laying hen management.

Files

Files (3.1 MB)

Name Size
md5:924e3dfc9b4f85f3dea230850dc16909
33.3 kB Download
md5:2609308241b7ca6aa91432b1a62f71f6
151.9 kB Download
md5:acd88a99a74cd5ca1f1a134c23e306d7
47.2 kB Download
md5:39ad0ec0f008da61e53a79544b6f2a42
65.2 kB Download
md5:a2638b40bdb710a2b63fd4f62517c5ce
136.3 kB Download
md5:5ba06b16a58b41bf678a69da330d6ed5
2.0 MB Download
md5:d7bd811b31452c5cbefeff3f75f5d9e5
425.9 kB Download
md5:aeffac41a430a0d58bd82560c95ac74c
319.9 kB Download

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
Journal article: 10.1016/j.applanim.2023.106056 (DOI)