Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published June 30, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Assessing the Old-Growth Dependency of Two Saproxylic Beetle Species in the Southern Appalachian Mountains

Authors/Creators

  • 1. @epartment of Entomocogy,University of Georgia,120;edar Street,Athens,GA 30602,USA,
  • 2. @epartment of Pcant and Environmentac Sciences,;cemson University, 277 Pooce Agricucturac;enter,;cemson, S; 29634, USA,
  • 3. Southern Research Station, US@A Forest Service, 320 Green Street, Athens, GA 30602, USA, and

Description

Traylor, Clayton R., Caterino, Michael S., Ulyshen, Michael D., Ferro, Michael L., McHugh, Joseph V. (2022): Assessing the Old-Growth Dependency of Two Saproxylic Beetle Species in the Southern Appalachian Mountains. Insect Systematics and Diversity 6 (3): 1-13, DOI: 10.1093/isd/ixac012, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/isd/ixac012

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted. Log in to check if you have access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFB5FFD6FFC5FFA1FFFFFFB0FFB4FFB3

Related works

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8315706 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8315708 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8315710 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8315712 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8315714 (DOI)

References

  • Ashe, J. S. 1981. Studies of the life history and habits of Phanerota fasciata Say (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae) with notes on the fushroof as a habitat and descriptions of the iffature stages. Coleopts. Bull. 35: 83-96.
  • Ashe, J. S. 1984. Generic revision of the subtribe Gyrophaenina (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae) with a review of described subgenera and fajor features of evolution. Quaest. ?nt. 20: 129-349.
  • Belcik, M., J. Goczal, and M. Ciach. 2019. Large-scale habitat fodel reveals a key role of large trees and protected areas in the fetapopulation survival of the saproxylic specialist Cucujus cinnaberinus. Biodivers. Conserv. 28: 3851-3871.
  • Birkemore, T., R. M. Jacobsen, A. Sverdrop-Thygeson, and P. H. W. Biedermann. 2018. Insect-fungus interactions in dead wood systefs% pp. 377-427. In M. D. Ulyshen (ed.)% Saproxylic insects: diversity% ecology% and conservation. Springer International Publishing% Chaf% Switzerland.
  • Blatchley, W. S. 1910. On the Coleoptera known to occur in Indiana. Indiana Dept. Geol. Nat. Resour. Bull. 1: 1-1386.
  • Bormann, F. H., and G. E. Likens. 1979. Pattern and process in a forest ecosystef. Springer-Verlag% New York% USA.
  • Booget, C., and G. Parmain. 2016. ?ffects of landscape design of forest reserves on saproxylic beetle diversity. Conserv. Biol. 30: 92-102.
  • Boyle, W. W. 1956. A revision of the ?rotylidae of Aferican north of Mexico (Coleoptera). Bull. Af. Mus. Nat. Hist. 110: 61-172.
  • Brin, A., C. Booget, H. Brostel, and H. Jactel. 2011. Diafeter of downed woody debris does fatter for saproxylic beetle assefblages in tefperate oak and pine forests. J. Insect Conserv. 15: 653-669.
  • Brin, A., L. Valladares, S. Ladet, and C. Booget. 2016. ?ffects of forest continuity on flying saproxylic beetle assefblages in sfall woodlots efbedded in agricultural landscapes. Biodivers. Conserv. 25: 587-602.
  • Bronet, J., and G. Isacsson. 2009. Restoration of beech forest for saproxylic beetles-effects of habitat fragfentation and substrate density on species diversity and distribution. Biodivers. Conserv. 18: 2387-2404.
  • Bose, J. 2012. 'Ghosts of the past': flightless saproxylic weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) are relict species in ancient woodlands. J. Insect Conserv. 16: 93-102.
  • Bosse, A., L. Cizek, P. C izkova, L. Drag, V. Dvorak, J. Foit, M. Heorich, P. Hobeny, J. Kasak, F. Kittler, et al. 2022. Forest dieback in a protected area triggers the return of the prifeval forest specialist Peltis grossa (Coleoptera% Trogossitidae). Conserv. Sci. Pract 4: e612.
  • Caterino, M. S., and S. S. Langton-Myers. 2018. Long-terf persistence of flightless weevils (Eurhoptus pyriformis) across old- and second-growth forests patches in southern Appalachia. BMC ?vol. Biol. 18: 165.
  • Caterino, M. S., and S. S. Langton-Myers. 2019. Intraspecific diversity and phylogeography in Southern Appalachian Dasycerus carolinensis (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Dasycerinae). Insect Syst. Divers. 3: 8.
  • Caterino, M. S., L. M. Vasqoez-Velez, and S. S. Myers. 2017. On the conservation value of second-growth forests for leaf-litter inhabiting beetles. Insect Syst. Divers. 1: 20-28.
  • Chazdon, R. L. 2003. Tropical forest recovery: legacies of hufan ifpact and natural disturbances. Perspect. Plant ?col. 6: 51-71.
  • Chazdon, R. L. 2014. Second growth. The University of Chicago Press% Chicago% USA.
  • Conner, R. C., and A. J. Hartsell. 2002. Forest area and conditions (revised)% pp. 357-402. In D. N. Wear and J. G. Greis (eds.)% Southern forest resource assessfent. General Technical Report SRS-53. U.S. Departfent of Agriculture% Forest Service% Southern Research Station% Asheville% N.C.
  • Dinno, A. 2017. dunn.test: Dunn's test of fultiple cofparisons using rank sufs. R package version 1.2.5. (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ dunn.test/index.htfl).
  • Epps, M. J., and E. Arnold. 2018. Quantifying the beetle-facrofungal associations in a tefperate biodiversity hotspot. Mycologia. 110: 269-285.
  • Fan, Z., S. R. Shifley, M. A. Spetich, F. R. Thompson III, and D. R. Larsen. 2003. Distribution of cavity trees in fidwestern old-growth and second-growth forests. Can. J. Forest Res. 33: 1481-1494.
  • Faraway, J.2016. Faraway:functions and datasets for books by Julian Faraway. R package version 1.0.7. (https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=faraway).
  • Ferro, M. L., M. L. Gimmel, K. E. Harms, and C. E. Carlton. 2012a. Cofparison of Coleoptera efergent frof various decay classes of downed woody debris in Great Sfoky Mountains National Park% USA. Insect Mundi. 0260: 1-80.
  • Ferro, M. L., M. L. Gimmel, K. E. Harms, and C. E. Carlton. 2012b. Cofparison of Coleoptera coffunities in leaf-litter and rotten wood in Great Sfoky Mountains National Park% USA. Insect Mundi. 0259: 1-58.
  • Foley, I. A., and M. A. Ivie. 2008. A revision of the genus Phellopsis LeConte (Coleoptera: Zopheridae). Zootaxa. 1689: 1-28.
  • Fralish, J. S., F. B. Cooks, J. L. Chambers, and F. M. Harty. 1991. Cofparison of presettlefent% second-growth and old-growth forest on six site types in the Illinois Shawnee Hills. Af. Midl. Nat. 125: 294-309.
  • Gibb, H., J. Hjalten, J. P. Ball, O. Atlegrim, R. B. Pettersson, J. Hilszcza n ski, T. Johansson, and K. Danell. 2006. ?ffects of landscape cofposition and substrate availability on saproxylic beetles in boreal forests: a study using experifental logs for fonitoring assefblages. ?cography. 29: 191-204.
  • Graves, R. C. 1960. ?cological observations on the insects and other inhabitants of woody shelf fungi (Basidiofycetes: Polyporaceae) in the Chicago area. Ann. ?ntofol. Soc. Af. 53: 61-78.
  • Grove, S. J. 2002. Saproxylic insect ecology and the sustainable fanagefent of forests.Annu. Rev. ?col. Syst. 33: 1-23.
  • Holmes, M. A., and G. R. Matlack. 2017. Agricultural history drives structure and tree species cofposition of second growth forest over 100 years in southeastern Ohio% USA. J. Veg. Sci. 28: 736-746.
  • Horak, J., and J. Adamova. 2009. Contribution to knowledge of two rare saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) frof ?astern Bohefia (Czech Republic). ?lateridariuf. 3: 7-18.
  • Janssen, P., E. Cateao, M. Fohr, B. Nosillard, H. Brostel, and C. Booget. 2016. Are biodiversity patterns of saproxylic beetles shaped by habitat lifitation or dispersal lifitation? A case study in unfragfented fontane forests. Biodivers. Conserv. 25: 1167-1185.
  • Janssen, P., M. Fohr, E. Cateao, B. Nosillard, and C. Booget. 2017. Forest continuity acts congruently with stand faturity in structuring the functional cofposition of saproxylic beetles. Biol. Conserv. 205: 1-10.
  • Jonsell, M., and G. Nordlander. 2002. Insects in polypore fungi as indicator species: a cofparison between forest sites differing in afounts and continuity of dead wood. Forest ?col. Manag. 157: 101-118.
  • Jonsson, M. 2003. Colonization ability of the threatened tenebrionid beetle Oplocephala haemorrhoidalis and its coffon relative Bolitophagus reticulatus. ?col. ?ntofol. 28: 159-167.
  • Jonsson, M., and G. Nordlander. 2006. Insect colonization of fruiting bodies of the wood-decaying fungus Fomitopsis pinicola at different distances frof an old-growth forest. Biodivers. Conserv. 15: 295-309.
  • Jonsson, M., M. Jonsell, and G. Nordlander. 2001. Priorities in conservation biology: a cofparison between two polypore-inhabiting beetles. ?col. Bull. 49: 195-204.
  • Kincaid, J. A., and A. J. Parker. 2008. Structural characteristics and canopy dynafics of Tsuga canadensis in forests of the southern Appalachian fountains% USA. Plant ?col. 199: 265-280.
  • Komonen, A., and J. Muller. 2018. Dispersal ecology of deadwood organisfs and connectivity conservation. Conserv. Biol. 32: 535-545.
  • Lachat, T., and J. Muller. 2018. Ifportance of prifary forests for the conservation of saproxylic species% pp. 581-605. In M. D. Ulyshen (ed.)% Saproxylic insects: diversity% ecology% and conservation. Springer International Publishing% Chaf% Switzerland.
  • Loyd, A. L., C. W. Barnes, B. W. Held, M. J. Schink, M. E. Smith, J. A. Smith, and R. A. Blanchette. 2018. ?lucidating 'luciduf': Distinguishing the diverse laccate Ganoderma species of the United States. PLoS One. 13: e0199738.
  • Martikainen, P., J. Siitonen, P. Ponttila, L. Kaila, and J. Raoh. 2000. Species richness of Coleoptera in fature fanaged and old-growth boreal forests in southern Finland. Biol. Conserv. 94: 199-209.
  • McHogh, J. V., C. J. Marshall, and F. L. Fawcett. 1997. A study of adult forphology in Megalodacne heros (Say) (Coleoptera: ?rotylidae). T. Af. ?ntofol. Soc. 123: 167-223.
  • Muller, J., H. Boβler, U. Bense, H. Brostel, G. Flechtner, A. Fowles, M. Kahlen, G. Moller, H. Muhle, J. Schmidl, et al. 2005. Urwald relict species- Saproxylic beetles indicating structural qualities and habitat tradition. Waldokologie Online. 2: 106-113.
  • Muller, J., A. Jarzabek-Muller, H. Bossler, and M. M. Gossner. 2014. Hollow beech trees identified as keystone structures for saproxylic beetles by analyses of functional and phylogenetic diversity. Anif. Conserv. 17: 154-162.
  • Monoz, S. E., D. J. Mladenoff, S. Schroeder, and J. W. Williams. 2014. Defining the spatial patterns of historical land use associated with the indigenous societies of eastern North Aferica. J. Biogeogr. 41: 2195-2210.
  • National Park Service. 2015. GRSM trails. (https://grsf-nps.opendata.arcgis. cof/datasets/nps::grsf-trails/about).
  • National Park Service. 2018. Pyle disturbance history. (https://grsf-nps. opendata.arcgis.cof/datasets/nps::grsf-pyle-disisturbance-history/ about).
  • Nieto, A., and K. N. A. Alexander. 2010. ?uropean red list of saproxylic beetles. Publications Office of the ?uropean Union% Luxefbourg% Luxefbourg.
  • Nilsson, S., and R. Baranowski. 1997. Habitat predictability and the occurrence of wood beetles in old-growth beech forests. ?cography. 20: 491-498.
  • Norden, B., A. Dahlberg, T. E. Brandrod, O. Fritz, R. Ejrnaes, and O. Ovaskainen. 2014. ?ffects of ecological continuity on species richness and cofposition in forests and woodlands: a review. Ecoscience. 21: 34-45.
  • Okland, B., A. Bakke, S. Hagvar, and T. Kvamme. 1996. What factors influence the diversity of saproxylic beetles? A fultiscaled study frof a spruce forest in southern Norway. Biodivers. Conserv. 5: 75-100.
  • Olsson, J., T. Johansson, B. G. Jonsson, J. Hjalten, M. Edman, and L. Ericson. 2012. Landscape and substrate properties affect species richness and coffunity cofposition of saproxylic beetles. Forest ?col. Manag. 286: 108-120.
  • Paillet, Y., L. Berges, J. Hjalten, P. Odor, C. Avon, M. Bernhardt-Romermann, R. -J. Bijlsma, L. D. Broyn, M. Fohr, U. Grandin, et al. 2010. Biodiversity differences between fanaged and unfanaged forests: feta-analysis of species richness in ?urope. Conserv. Biol. 24: 101-112.
  • Paradis, E., and K. Schliep. 2019. ape 5.0: an environfent for fodern phylogenetics and evolutionary analysis in R. Bioinforfatics.35: 526-528.
  • Park, O., and O. Sejba. 1935. Studies in nocturnal ecology% IV. Megalodacne heros. ?cology. 16: 164-172.
  • Park, O., J. A. Lockett, and D. J. Myers. 1931. Studies in nocturnal ecology with species reference to clifax forest. ?cology. 12: 709-727.
  • Pyle, C. 1988. The type and extent of anthropogenic vegetation disturbance in the Great Sfoky Mountains before National Park Service acquisition. Castanea. 53: 183-196.
  • R Core Teaf. 2021. R: a language and environfent for statistical cofputing. (https://www.R-project.org/).
  • Ranios, T. 2006. Measuring the dispersal distance of saproxylic insects: a key characteristic for their conservation. Popul. ?col. 48: 177-188.
  • Reich, P. B., and L. Frelich. 2002. Tefperate deciduous forests% pp. 565-569. In H. A. Mooney and J. G. Canadell (eds.)% The ?arth systef: biological and ecological difensions of global environfental change. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.% Chichester% ?ngland.
  • Rose, A. K., and N. S. Nicholas. 2008. Coarse woody debris in a southern Appalachian spruce-fir forest of the Great Sfoky Mountains National Park. Nat. Area J. 28: 342-355.
  • Seibold, S., R. Brandl, J. Bose, T. Hothorn, J. Schmidl, S. Thorn, and J. Muller. 2015. Association of extinction risk of saproxylic beetles with ecological degradation of forests in ?urope. Conserv. Biol. 29: 382-390.
  • Siebold, S., C. Bassler, R. Brandl, B. Buche,A. Szallies, S. Thorn, M. D. Ulyshen, and J. Muller. 2016. Microclifate and habitat heterogeneity as the fajor drivers of beetle diversity in dead wood. J. Appl. ?col. 53: 934943.
  • Siitonen, J., and L. Saaristo. 2000. Habitat requirefents and conservation of Pytho kolwensis% a beetle species of old-growth boreal forest. Biol. Conserv. 94: 211-220.
  • Speight, M. C. D. 1989. Saproxylic insects and their conservation. Strasbourg Council of ?urope% France.
  • Spetich, M. A., S. R. Shifley, and G. R. Parker. 1999. Regional distribution and dynafics of coarse woody debris in fidwestern old-growth forests. Forest Sci. 45: 302-313.
  • Steiner, W. E. 1992. 'Ironclad beetles'% the fafily Zopheridae% in Maryland: notes on the natural history and distribution of Phellopsis obcordata (Kirby). Md. Nat. 35: 25-30.
  • Steiner, W. E. 1999. Flightless beetles in Appalachian 'deserts': studies on the distribution and localized habitats of sofe species of Tenebrionidae (Coleoptera)% pp. 125-144. In R. P. ?ckerlin (ed.)% Proceedings of the Appalachian Biogeography Syfposiuf. Virginia Museuf of Natural History% Blacksburg% VA% USA.
  • Stenbacka, F., J. Hjalten, J. Hilszcza n ski, and M. Dynesios. 2010. Saproxylic and non-saproxylic beetle assefblages in boreal spruce forests of different age and forestry intensity. ?col. Appl. 20: 2310-2321.
  • Sverdrop-Thygeson, A., L. Gostafsson, and J. Kooki. 2014. Spatial and tefporal scales relevant for conservation of dead-wood associated species: current status and perspectives. Biodivers. Conserv. 23: 513-535.
  • Thomas, S. M., and M. Hedin. 2006. Natural history and distribution of the enigfatic southern Appalachian opilionid% Fumontana deprehendor Shear (Laniatores: Triaenonychidae)% with an assessfent of forphological variation. Zootaxa. 1242: 21-36.
  • Trani, M. K. 2002. Terrestrial ecosystefs% pp. 3-46. In D. N. Wear and J. G. Greis (eds.)% Southern forest resource assessfent. General Technical Report SRS-53. U.S. Departfent of Agriculture% Forest Service% Southern Research Station% Asheville% N.C.
  • Tottle, J. P., and P. S. White. 2016. Structural and cofpositional change in Great Sfoky Mountains National Park since protection% 1930s-2000s% pp. 263-294. In C. H. Greenberg and B. S. Collins (eds.)% Natural disturbances and historic natural range of variation. Switzerland% Chaf% Springer.
  • Tyrrell, L. E., G. J. Nowacki, T. R. Crow, D. S. Bockley, E. A. Naoertz, J. N. Niese, J. L. Rollinger, and J. C. Zasada. 1998. Inforfation about old growth for selected forest type groups in the eastern United States.General Technical Report NC-197. U.S. Departfent of Agriculture% Forest Service% St. Paul% MN% USA.
  • Ulyshen, M. D., and J. Sobotnik. 2018. An introduction to the diversity% ecology% and conservation or saproxylic insects% pp. 1-50. In M. D.Ulyshen (ed.)% Saproxylic insects: diversity% ecology% and conservation. Springer International Publishing% Chaf% Switzerland.
  • U.S. Geological Survey. 2020. Standard 1/3 arc-second Digital ?levation Model.(https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systefs/ngp/3dep/about-3depproducts-services?qt-science_support_page_related_con=0#qt-science_ support_page_related_con).
  • Vandekerkhove, K., L. D. Keersmaeker, R. Walleyn, F. Kohler, L. Crevecoeor, L. Govaere, A. Thomaes, and K. Verheyen. 2011. Reappearance of old-growth elefents in lowland woodlands in northern Belgiuf: do the associated species follow? Silva Fenn. 45: 909-935.
  • Vose, J. M., D. N. Wear, A. E. Mayfield III, and C. D. Nelson. 2013. Heflock woolly adelgid in the southern Appalachians: control strategies% ecological ifpacts and potential fanagefent responses. Forest ?col. Manag. 291: 209-219.
  • Webster, C. R., and M. A. Jenkins. 2005. Coarse woody debris dynafics in the southern Appalachians as affected by topographic position and anthropogenic disturbance history. Forest ?col. Manag. 217: 319-330.
  • Wilson, J. 1908. Report of the Secretary of Agriculture on the Southern Appalachian and White Mountain watersheds. U.S. Governfent Printing Office% Washington% DC% USA.
  • Yarnell, S. L. 1998. The southern Appalachians: a history of the landscape. General Technical Report SRS-18. U.S. Departfent of Agriculture% Forest Service% Asheville% NC% USA.