Proceedings of the Institutes for Advanced Studies
Published May 17, 2022 | Version v1
Conference paper Open

Diversity in Modes of Veridiction in Knowledge Generation for Society. What STEM can learn from the SSH

Authors/Creators

  • 1. European Network for Research Evaluation in the SSH (ENRESSH)

Description

Evaluation of Social Sciences and Humanities in Europe. Hcéres Colloquium Proceedings - Paris IAS, 16-17 May 2022. Session 3 "The participation of SSH to Eropean Research" - SSH in interaction : perspectives

Files

3-2-2_Ochsner.pdf

Files (247.9 kB)

Name Size
md5:6eab2c1807efef7423de0b6daeac36cd
247.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Bonaccorsi, A. (2022). An epistemic approach to research assessment in the social science. In T. Engels & E. Kulczycki (Eds.), Handbook on Research Assessment in the Social Sciences (pp. 14–47). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800372559
  • Bonaccorsi, A. (2018). Towards an Epistemic Approach to Evaluation in SSH. In A. Bonaccorsi (Ed.), The evaluation of research in social sciences and humanities. Lessons from the Italian experience (pp. 1–29). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68554-0_1
  • Davenport, E. (1981). Updating Wilhelm Dilthey: Values and Objectivity in Literary Criticism. Mosaic an Interdisciplinary Critical Journal, 14(4), 89–105. https://mosaic.umanitoba.ca/common/issue/get/14/4
  • Dilthey, W. (1970). Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften.
  • D.O.R.A. (2013). San Fransisco Declaration on Research Assessment. https://sfdora.org/read/
  • Commission, E., & Directorate-General for Researc and Innovation, D.-G. (2021). Towards a reform of the research assessment system: scoping report (p. 25 p.) [Techreport]. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/707440
  • Commission, E., for Research and Innovation, D.-G., Kania, K., & Bucksch, R. (2020). Integration of social sciences and humanities in Horizon 2020: participants, budgets and disciplines (p. 70 p.) [Techreport]. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/141795
  • Gerring, J. (2010). Causal Mechanisms: Yes, But. Comparative Political Studies, 43(11), 1499–1526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010376911
  • Giesselmann, M., & Schmidt-Catran, A. W. (2020). Interactions in Fixed Effects Regression Models. Sociological Methods & Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124120914934
  • Herkenrath, M., & Bornschier, V. (2003). Transnational Corporations in World Development – Still the Same Harmful Effects in an Increasingly Globalized World Economy? Journal of World-Systems Research, 9(1), 105–139. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2003.246
  • Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a
  • König, T. (2016). Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities at the European Level: The Experiences of the European Research Council. In M. Ochsner, S. E. Hug, & H.-D. Daniel (Eds.), Research Assessment in the Humanities. Towards Criteria and Procedures (pp. 151–163). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_12
  • Latour, B. (2012). Enquête sur les modes d'existence. Une anthropologie des Modernes. La Découverte. La Decouverte.
  • Latour, B. (2021). Où suis-je ? Leçons du confinement à l'usage des terrestres. La Découverte. La Découverte.
  • Latour, B. (2022). En mode Bruno Latour 2/4 : La science a-t-elle toujours raison ? In Les Chemins de la philosophie. https://podcasts.apple.com/fr/podcast/en-mode-bruno-latour-2-4-la-science-a-t-elle-toujours-raison/id390165399?i=1000554865873
  • Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. Suhrkamp.
  • Ma, L. (2022). Metrics and epistemic injustice. Journal of Documentation, 78(7), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2021-0240
  • Machlup, F. (1961). Are the Social Sciences Really Inferior? Southern Economic Journal, 27(3), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.2307/1055084
  • Morin, E. (2021). Penser global. L'homme et son univers (édition Champs). Flammarion. Flammarion. https://editions.flammarion.com/penser-global/9782080255709
  • Paquet, J.-E. (2020). Foreword. In European Commission & D.-G. for Research and Innovation (Eds.), Integration of social sciences and humanities in Horizon 2020 : participants, budgets and disciplines (p. 3). Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/141795
  • Schögler, R., & König, T. (2017). Thematic Research Funding in the European Union: What is Expected from Social Scientific Knowledge-making? Serendipities. Journal for the Sociology and History of the Social Sciences, 2(1), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.25364/11.2:2017.1.7
  • Storer, N. W. (1967). The Hard Sciences and the Soft: Some Sociological Observations. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 55(1), 75–84. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC198502/
  • Trowler, P. (2014). Academic Tribes and Territories: the theoretical trajectory. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften, 25(3), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.25365/oezg-2014-25-3-2