Published August 31, 2023 | Version v1

Statistical Analysis to Support Improved Student Outcomes

  • 1. Los Alamos National Laboratory
  • 2. The University of Texas at Austin

Description

A supply of individuals trained in STEM is needed to meet the employment needs of the United States. To address this need, an analytics initiative was executed to analyze multiple data streams relevant to education and learning. The goal of this effort was to identify factors that impact educational outcomes. Knowledge about these factors can potentially be used to improve the educational environment. This investigation makes use of big data and analytics to build predictive models for improving student success. Data is used to help understand how children, adolescents, and adults progress throughout the education system. Though additional study and verification of the factors identified by the models is recommended, knowledge of factors affecting students with different attributes could be a powerful source of information for addressing the needs of students and helping them to achieve successful outcomes such as on-time high school graduation, higher education degree completion, and STEM degree completion. Putting knowledge about different effects into action can pave the way for increasing the number of individuals who complete high school, college, and STEM degrees.

Notes

This paper was presented at the 2022 Joint Statistical Meetings in Washington, DC. This research was conducted while Claire McKay Bowen was employed at Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Amy L. Wiseman was employed at The University of Texas at Austin. Claire McKay Bowen is currently employed at Urban Institute, and Amy L. Wiseman is currently employed at Texas State University.

Files

JoanneWendelberger.JSM2022.Proceedings.27sept2022.FINAL.pdf

Files (1.2 MB)

Name Size
md5:8d6cf100315489911fca9ca3a89166e7
1.2 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Agresti, A., 2019. An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis, 3rd Ed., Wiley.
  • Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1):5-32. doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324
  • Breiman, L., J. Friedman, C. Stone, and R. Olshen, 2001. Classification and Regression Trees, Wadsworth.
  • Chetty, R., N. Hendren, P. Kline, E. Saez, and N. Turner, 2014. Is the United States still a land of opportunity? Recent trends in intergenerational mobility. Working Paper 19844, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. http://www.nber.org/papers/w19844
  • Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, 2008. The Elements of Statistical Learning, 2nd Ed., Springer.
  • Jones-White, D. R., P. Radcliffe, R. Huesman, Jr., and J. Kellogg, 2009. Defining student success: applying different multinomial regression techniques for the study of student graduation across institutions of higher education. Res. High. Educ., 51:154-174.
  • Karlson, K. B., 2011. Multiple paths in educational transitions: a multinomial transition model with unobserved heterogeneity. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 29, 323-341.
  • Mare, R.D., 1981. Change and stability in educational stratification. American Sociological Review, 46, 72-87.
  • UCLA Institute for Digital Research and Education, Multinomial logistic regression | R data analysis examples. https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/r/dae/multinomial-logistic-regression/ accessed January 27, 2021.
  • Ripley, B. R., 2022. Package 'nnet'. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nnet/nnet.pdf