Published June 1, 2011 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Pediatric Endodontics- Endodontist's view

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Department of Pediatric Endodontics, Yerala Medical Trust Dental College & Hospital, Kharghar, Navi-Mumbai-410210

Description

The dental diseases affecting the pulp and periapical tissues in the primary and permanent dentitions pose treatment challenges for the endodontists because of the vast variations in these dentitions basically due to factors like longetivity of primary teeth , coronal structure and root canal morphology and anatomy of the teeth which needs to be critically analysed before rendering treatment. In recent years, new materials, equipments and instruments have evolved to a great extent and simplified the endodontic treatment procedures for the clinicians. The aim of this article is to highlight the clinical techniques and treatment considerations in treating the vital and non-vital as well as emphasize on surgical management of cases.

Files

Dr. Vibha Hegde - 18.pdf

Files (69.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:bc629f7b29b7cbbafc98ca13ea383b1c
69.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Araujo FB, Ely LB, Pergo AM, Pesce HF: A clinical evaluation of 2% buffered glutaraldehyde in pulpotomies of human deciduous teeth: A 24- month study. Brazilian Dental Journal, 1995;6(1):41-44
  • 2. Banchs F, Trope M: Revascularisation of immature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis: new technique protocol? Journal of Endodontic, 2004; 30(4):196-200.
  • 3. Cox CF, Suzuki S: Re-evaluating pulp protection: calcium hydroxide liners vs cohesive hybridization. Journal of American Dental Association, 1994;125(7): 823-831.
  • 4. Camp JH: Diagnosis dilemmas in vital pulp therapy: treatment for the toothache is changing especially in young immature teeth. Pediatric Dentistry, 2008; 30(3): 197-205.
  • 5. Caicedo R, Abbott PV, Alongi DJ, Alarcon MY: Clinical, radigraphical and histological analysis of the effects of mineral trioxide aggregate used in direct pulp capping and pulpotomies in primary teeth. Australian Dental Journal, 2006;51(4):297-305
  • 6. Elliot RD, Roberts MW, Burkes J, Phillips C: Evaluation of carbon dioxide laser on vital human primary pulp tissue. Pediatric Dentistry, 1999;21(6):327-331.
  • 7. Evans D, Reid J, Strang R, Stirrups D: A comparison of Laser Doppler flowmetry with other methods of assessing the vitality of traumatized anterior teeth. Endodontics & Dental Traumatology, 1999; 15(6): 284- 290
  • 8. Fadavi S, Anderson AW: A comparison of the pulpal response to freeze-dried bone, calcium hydroxide, and zinc-oxide-eugenol in primary teeth in two cynomolgus monkeys. Pediatric Dentistry, 1996;18(1):52-56
  • 9. Fishman SA, Udin RD, Good DL, Rodef F: Success of electrofulguration pulpotomies covered by zinc oxide eugenol or calcium hydroxide: A clinical study. Pediatric Dentistry, 1996;18(5):385-390
  • 10. Fuks AB: Current concepts in vital primary pulp therapy. Europian Journal of Pediatrics Dentistry, 2002; 3(3):115-120.
  • 11. Fuks AB: Pulp therapy for the primary dentition. In: Pediatric Dentistry: infancy through adolescence. JR Pinkham, PS Casamassimo, HW Fields (Jr.), DG McTigue, AJ Nawak. (Eds.); 4thEdn.; Elsevier: A division of Reed Elsevier India, New Delhi, 2005:pp375-393.
  • 12. Fuks AB: Vital pulp therapy with newer materials for primary teeth: New directions and treatment perspectives. Journal of Endodontics, 2008;34(7 suppl) :S18-S24.
  • 13. Hibbard ED, Ireland RL: Morphology of the root canals of primary molar teeth. Journal of Dentistry for Children, 1957; 24: 250-257.
  • 14. Huth KC, Paschos E, Hajek-Al-Khatar N, Hollweck R, Crispin A, Hickel R, Folwaczny M: Effectiveness of 4 pulpotomy techniques: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Dental Research, 2005;84(12):1144-1148
  • 15. Ibricevic H, al-Jame Q: Ferric Sulphate as pulpotomy agent in primary teeth: twenty- month clinical follow up. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2000;24:269-272
  • 16. Mackie IC: (UK National Clinical Guidelines in Pediatric Dentistry) Management and Root canal treatment of non-vital immature permanent incisor teeth International Journal of Pediatric Dentistry, 1998;8:289-293
  • 17. Massara MLA, Alves JB, Brandao PRG: Atraumatic restorative treatment: clinical, ultrastructural and chemical analysis. Caries Research, 2002; 36(6): 430- 436.
  • 18. Mortazavi M, Mesbahi M: Comparison of Zinc oxide eugenol and vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth. International Journal of Pediatric Dentistry, 2004;14(6):417-424
  • 19. Nakashima M: Induction of dentine formation on canine amputated pulp by recombinant human bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) 2 & 4. Journal of Dental Research, 1994;73(9): 1515-1522.
  • 20. Rolling I, Thylstrup A: A 3 year follow up study of pulpotomised primary molars treated with the Formocresol technique. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 1975;83(2):47-53.
  • 21. Rutherford RB, Wahle J, Tucker M, Rueger D, Charette M: Induction of reparative dentine formation in monkeys by recombinant human osteogenetic protein-1. Archives of Oral Biology, 1993;38(7):571-576.
  • 22. Vij R, Coll JA, Shetlron P, Farooq NS: Caries control and other variables associated with success of primary molar vital pulp therapy. Pediatric Dentistry 2004;26(3):214- 220.
  • 23. Vargas KG, Packham B, Lowman D: Preliminary evaluation of sodium hypochlorite for pulpotomies in primary molars. Pediatric Dentistry, 2006; 28(6):511-517
  • 24. Witherspoon DE: Vital pulp therapy with newer materials: new directions and treatment perspective – Permanent teeth. Pedeatrics Dentistry, 2008;30(3):220- 224.