People's Journal of Scientific Research
Published December 1, 2011 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Effect of Cola on Surface Microhardness and Marginal Integrity of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer and Compomer Restoration – An in vitro St

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, Virajpet - 571218

Description

This study was carried out to evaluate the surface microhardness and marginal integrity of a resin modified glass ionomer and a compomer after immersing them in a cola soft drink for variable periods of time. The study was conducted in two parts. Forty two standard class V cavities were prepared on extracted human premolars, restored with Dyract AP and Fuji II LC and evaluated for marginal integrity. Forty two circular discs (CDs) were prepared with Dyract AP and Fuji II LC to test microhardness. These specimens were immersed in a cola drink under low, medium and high immersion regimes. Marginal integrity was analyzed using stereomicroscope and surface microhardness was evaluated on the circular discs using a microhardness tester. Statistical analysis revealed that the marginal integrity was least affected in low and medium immersion regimes and highly affected under high immersion regime. Surface microhardness was least affected in low immersion regime, while, medium and high immersion regimes showed appreciable softening of both restorative materials evaluated.

Files

8-Vanga Narsimha.pdf

Files (198.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:832e151e6d0e7a1cf54f948d1b2cfd9b
198.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Attin T, Buchalla W, Hellwig E: Influence of enamel conditioning on bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composites. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1996;76(1):29-33
  • 2. Attin T, Buchalla W, Trett A, Hellwig E: Toothbrushing abrasion of polyacid-modified composites in neutral and acidic buffer solutions. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1998;80(2):148-150.
  • 3. Attin T, Koidl U, Buchalla W, Schaller HG, Kielbassa AM, Hellwig E: Correlation of microhardness and wear in differently eroded bovine dental enamel. Archives of Oral Biology, 1997;42(3):243-250.
  • 4. Bouschlicher MR, Vargas MA, Denehy GE: Effect of desiccation on microleakage of five Class 5 restorative materials. Operative Dentistry, 1996;21(3):90-95
  • 5. Brackett WW, Gunnin TD, Johnson WW, Conkin JE: Microleakage of light-cured glass-ionomer restorative materials. Quintessence International, 1995;26(8):583- 585.
  • 6. Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V, Moya F, Payan J, Meyer JM: Comparative study of the physical properties of a polyacid-modified composite resin and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Dental, Materials, 1999;15(1):21- 32.
  • 7. Chadwick RG, McCabe JF, Walls AW, Storer R: The effect of storage media upon the surface microhardness and abrasion resistance of three composites. Dental Materials, 1990;6(2):123-128.
  • 8. de Gee AJ, van Duinen RN, Werner A, Davidson CL: Early and long-term wear of conventional and resinmodified glass ionomers. Journal of Dental, Research, 1996;75(8):1613-1619
  • 9. Ferrari M, Davidson CL: Sealing capacity of a resinmodified glass-ionomer and resin composite placed in vivo in Class 5 restorations. Operative Dentistry, 1996;21(2):69-72.
  • 10. Frazier K B, Rueggeberg FA, Mettenburg D J: Comparison of wear-resistance of Class V restorative materials. Journal of Esthetic & Restorative Dentistry, 1998;10(6):309-314.
  • 11. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G: Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. Journal of Dental Research, 1997;76(4):883-894.
  • 12. Grando LJ, Tames DR, Cardoso AC, Gabilan NH: In vitro study of enamel erosion caused by soft drinks and lemon juice in deciduous teeth analysed by stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Caries Research, 1996;30(5):373-378.
  • 13. Hall LH, Cochran MA, Swartz ML. Class 5 composite resin restorative: margin configurations and the distance from the CEJ. Operative Dentistry, 1993;18(6):246-250.
  • 14. Hse KM, Leung SK, Wei SH: Resin-ionomer restorative materials for children: a review. Australian Dental Journal, 1999 ;44(1):1-11.
  • 15. Kelleher M, Bishop K: Tooth surface loss: An overview. British Dental Journal, 1999;186(2):61-66.
  • 16. Kudalkar SA, Damle SG: The comparative evaluation of release profiles of aluminium, fluoride, sodium and strontium by resin modified and conventional glass polyalkenoate cements in neutral and acidic medium an in vitro study. Journal of the Indian Society Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, 1997;15(1):1-9.
  • 17. Kula K, Webb EL, Kula TJ: Effect of one and four minute treatments of topical fluorides on a composite resin. Pediatric Dentistry, 1996;18(1):24-28.
  • 18. Maupome G, Aguilar-Avila M, Medrano-Ugalde HA Borgeso-Yanez A: In vitro quantitative microhardness assessment of enamel with early salivary pellicle after exposure to an eroding cola drink. Caries Research, 1999; 33(2) : 140 - 147.
  • 19. Maupomé G, Díez-de-Bonilla J, Torres-Villaseñor G, Andrade-Delgado LC, Castaño VM: In vitro quantitative assessment of enamel microhardness after exposure to eroding immersion in a cola drink. Caries Research, 1998;32(2):148-153.
  • 20. McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD:Proposed nomenclature for glass-ionomer dental cements and related materials. Quintessence International, 1994; 25(9):587-589.
  • 21. Meurman JH, Frank RM: Scanning electron microscopic study of the effect of salivary pellicle on enamel erosion. Caries Research, 1991;25(1):1-6.
  • 22. Nunn JH: Prevalence of dental erosion and the implications for oral health. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 1996;104(2):156-161.
  • 23. Rugg-Gunn AJ, Maguire A, Gordon PH, McCabe JF, Stephenson G: Comparison of erosion of dental enamel by four drinks using an intra-oral applicance. Caries Research, 1998;32(5):337-343.
  • 24. Rytömaa I, Meurman JH, Koskinen J, Laakso T, Gharazi L, Turunen R: In vitro erosion of bovine enamel caused by acidic drinks and other foodstuffs. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research, 1988;96(4):324-333.
  • 25. Shaw L, Smitha AJ: Dental erosion-the problem and some practical solutions. British Dental Journal, 1999 ;186(3):115-118.
  • 26. Sorvari R, Meurman JH, Alakuijala P, Frank RM: Effect of fluoride varnish and solution on enamel erosion in vitro. Caries Research, 1994;28(4):227-232
  • 27. Staninec M, Holt M: Bonding of amalgam to tooth structure: Tensile adhesion and microleakage tests. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1988;59(4):397-402
  • 28. Steffen JM: The effects of soft drinks on etched and sealed enamel. The Angle Orthodontist, 1996;66(6):449- 456.
  • 29. Torstenson B, Brännström M: Contraction gap under composite resin restorations: effect of hygroscopic expansion and thermal stress. Operative Dentistry, 1988;13(1):24-31.
  • 30. Watts DC, Bertenshaw BW, Jugdev JS: pH and time dependence of surface degradation in compomer biomaterial." Journal of Dental Research, 1995;74(3): (Abstract No. 13) 912.
  • 31. Wilson AD: Glass-ionomer cement origins, development and future. Clinical Materials, 1991;7(4):275-282.
  • 32. Wu W, Toth EE, Moffa JF, Ellison JA: Subsurface damage layer of in vivo worn dental composite restorations. Journal of Dental Research, 1984;63(5):675-680.
  • 33. Zero DT: Etiology of dental erosion-extrinsic factors. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 1996;104(2):162- 177.