Published June 1, 2012 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Predictability of Yen Angle & Appraisal of Various Cephalometric Parameters in the Assessment of Sagittal Relationship between Maxilla and Mandible in Angle's Class II Malocclusion

  • 1. Department of Orthodontics, Darshan Dental College & Hospital, Udaipur

Description

The study was aimed to check the predictability and variability of Yen angle along with other sagittal discrepancy parameters and to discuss the correlation existing between them, so as to obtained a more reliable and least variable parameter for antero-posterior cephalometric analysis. The lateral cephalograms of 120 Class II malocclusion in Indian subjects were obtained and traced for seventeen different sagittal discrepancy parameters. The age of subjects ranged from 17-24 years. Study revealed that, Yen angle was highly reliable (CV= 1.81) and most homogenously distributed angular parameter to assess antero-posterior sagittal discrepancy. Other parameters like FABA, APDI/ PABA, SGn-AB and Beta angle also exhibit homogenous distribution and less variability in comparison to other parameters. As all the parameters used in the study share statistically significant correlation amongst themselves, instead of relying on one single parameter, others also should be checked and should be correlated with clinical findings.

Files

1. Jigar R. Doshi.pdf

Files (542.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:7009f054312ba6888df7fb747ce3279d
542.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Baik CY, Ververeidou M: A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: The Beta angle. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2004; 126(1):100-105.
  • 2. Beatty EJ: A modified technique for evaluating apical base relationship. American Journal of Orthodontics, 1975; 68(3):303-315
  • 3. Bjork A: Facial growth in man, studied with the aid of metallic implants. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 1955; 13(1): 9-34.
  • 4. Chang HP: Assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1987; 92(2):177-122.
  • 5. Cooke MS, Wei SH: A summary five factor cephalometric analysis based on natural head posture and the true horizontal. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1988; 93(3):213-223
  • 6. Downs WB: Analysis of the Dentofacial Profile. Angle Orthodontist, 1956;26(4):191-212.
  • 7. Freeman RS: Adjusting A-N-B angle to reflect the effect of maxillary position. Angle Orthodontist, 1981; 51(2): 161-171.
  • 8. Hussels W, Nanda RS: Analysis of factors effecting angle ANB. American Journal of Orthodontics, 1984; 85(5): 411-423
  • 9. Jacobson A: The "Wits" appraisal of the jaw disharmony. American Journal of Orthodontics, 1975; 67(2):125-138.
  • 10. Kim YH, Vietas JJ: Antero-Posterior dysplasia indicator: an adjunct to cephalometric differential diagnosis. American Journal of Orthodontics, 1978; 73(6): 619- 633
  • 11. Kim YH: A comparative cephalometric study on class II, Division 1, non extraction and extraction cases. Angle Orthodontist, 1979; 49(2):77-84
  • 12. Neela PK, Mascarenhas R, Husain A: A new sagittal dysplasia indicator: the yen angle. World Journal of Orthodontics, 2009;10(2):147-151.
  • 13. Oktay H: A Comparison of ANB, Wits, AF-BF and APDI measurements. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1991; 99(2):122-128.
  • 14. Raju NS, Prasad KG, Jayade VP: A modified approach for obtaining cephalograms in natural head position. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, 2001; 28(1):25-28.
  • 15. Richardson M: Measurement of dental base relationship. European Journal of Orthodontics, 1982; 4(4):251-256.
  • 16. Riedel RA: Relation of maxillary structures to the cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion. Angle Orthodontist, 1952; 22(3):142-145.
  • 17. Sarhan OA: A new Cephalometric parameter to aid in dental base relationship between maxilla and mandible. Angle Orthodontist, 1990; 60(1): 59-64.
  • 18. Taylor CM: Changes in relationship of nasion, point A and Point B and the effect on ANB. American Journal of Orthodontics, 1969; 56(2):143-163.
  • 19. Yang SD, Suhr CH: F-H to AB plane angle (FABA) for assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationships. Angle Orthodontist, 1995: 65(3): 223-232.