Published December 1, 2014 | Version v1

A study of Correlation of Transverse Cerebellar Diameter with Gestational Age in the Normal & Growth Restricted Fetuses in Western Uttar Pradesh

  • 1. Department of Anatomy, Saraswathi Institute of Medical Sciences, Anwarpur, Hapur
  • 2. Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Rama Medical College Hospital & Research Center, Hapur
  • 3. Department of Anatomy, Subharti Medical College, Meerut

Description

Transverse Cerebellar Diameter (TCD) is a more accurate & better predictor of gestational age in normal as well
as in IUGR fetuses. In intra uterine growth restricted (IUGR) Fetuses, the transverse cerebellar diameter does not get
affected due to insufficiency of fetal circulation and so can be used as an unbiased measurement of gestational age (GA).
It withstands deformation by external pressure because Cerebellum is the largest part of hind brain which lies in the
posterior cranial fossa, surrounded by the dense petrous ridges and the occipital bone. The cerebellum is easily visualized
sonographically. The aim of this study was to establish ‘Correlation between TCD & GA in Normal & IUGR fetuses’.
The study group comprised of 650 cases. Women having pregnancy between 14 to 40 weeks were considered for
Ultrasound Examination. Patients who had any complication of pregnancy were not included in the study. During 14 to 26
weeks of gestation- transverse cerebellar diameter in mm was found equivalent to gestation age of fetus. The Karl Pearson
correlation coefficient between gestational age & transverse cerebellar diameter was found to be 0.972305. p-value is <
0.001 which was highly significant. In IUGR Fetuses, the value of measurement of Transverse Cerebellar Diameter was less
than the normally grown fetuses. The mean difference was 1.065 from the expected mean for normally grown fetuses. p-
value was p< 0.01 i.e. statistically significant. In the normal & IUGR Fetuses the Transverse Cerebellar Diameter increases
with advancing age. Linear relationship of TCD is observed with GA. This study shows highly significant correlation
between Transverse Cerebellar Diameter & Gestation age in normal & IUGR fetuses.

Files

3 BansalM3.pdf

Files (81.5 kB)

Name Size
md5:dc76796817ba6411b3efff88a60d1f10
81.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Sadler TW. Third month to birth: The Fetus and Placenta. In: Langman's medical embryology, 10th Edn. Wolters Kluwer (India) Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. Second Indian Reprint 2007; 90,118
  • 2. Hill LM, Guzick D, Fries J, Hixson J, Rivello D. The transverse cerebellar diameter in estimating gestational age in large for gestational age foetus. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75: 981-85
  • 3. McLeary RD, Kuhns LR, Barr M, Jr. Ultrasonography of the fetal cerebellum. Radiology 1984;151:439-42
  • 4. Richord D Mcllary,Lawrence R Kuhns, Mason Barr Jr. Ultrasonography of the fetal cerebellum. Radiology 1984;151:439-42.
  • 5. Lee W, Barton S, Comstock CH, Bajorek S, Batton D, Kirk JS. Transverse cerebellar diameter: a useful predictor of gestational age for fetuses with asymmetric growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:1044- 50.
  • 6. Larroche JC. The development of the central nervous system during intrauterine life, Part II. In: Falkner F (ed) Human Development. Philadelphia; Saunders 1966;257- 76.
  • 7. Reece EA, Goldstein I, Pilu G, Hobbins JC. Fetal cerebellar growth unaffected by intrauterine growth retardation: a new parameter for prenatal diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;157:632-38.
  • 8. Meyer WJ, Gauthier DW, Goldenberg B, Santolaya J, Sipos J, Cattledge F. The fetal transverse cerebellar diameter/abdominal circumference ratio: a gestational age-independent method of assessing fetal size. J Utrasound Med 1993;12:379-82
  • 9. Goel P, Singla M, Ghai R, Jain S, Budhiraja V, Ramesh babu CS. Transverse cerebellar diameter – a marker for estimation of gestational age. J Anat Soc India 2010;59 ;158-61
  • 10. Cabbad M, Kofinas A, Simon N, King K, Lyttle EF. Fetal weight-cerebellar diameter discordance as an indicator of asymmetrical fetal growth impairment. J Reprod Med 1992; 37(9): 794-8