Virtual senses: Active cameras in improving online learning experience of St. Dominic College of Asia SASE students
Authors/Creators
- 1. St. Dominic College of Asia
Description
Countless research have focused on online learning, and very few scholarly works examined online learning in terms of the broader student experience. This study aims to better understand the use of active cameras in improving the online learning experience of School of Arts, Sciences, and Education students in St. Dominic College of Asia using six factors: Participation and Productivity, Presence, Connection and Bond, Efficient Communication, Motivation and Confidence, and Application. As defined in the study, active cameras are the use of video cameras throughout the online classes for both the teachers and the students. The researchers utilized a descriptive research design to define and interpret the current status of individuals, settings, or events (Mertler, 2014). This helped the researchers determine the cause-effect relationship of the variables: the student with an active camera and the camera itself. Researchers used an online survey via Google Forms to collect data. Using different statistical tools, the researchers found that most of the 131 respondents agreed that the use of active cameras improved their learning experience. Notably, it helps in enhancing their participation and productivity, presence, communication efficiency, and connection and bond with their teachers and classmates.
Files
BACOMM2021-04_TALANIA.pdf
Additional details
References
- Alsaaty, F. M., Carter, E., Abrahams, D., & Alshameri, F. (2016). Traditional versus online learning in institutions of higher education: Minority business students' perceptions. Business and Management Research, 5(2), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.5430/bmr.v5n2p31
- Bettinger, E. P., Fox, L., Loeb, S., & Taylor, E. S. (2017). Virtual classrooms: How online college courses affect student success. American Economic Review, 107(9), 2855-2875. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151193
- Chaney, D., Chaney, E., & Eddy, J. (2010). The context of distance learning programs in higher education: Five enabling assumptions. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(4). https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.838.9912&rep=rep1&type=pdf
- Collis, B. (1996). The Internet as an educational innovation: Lessons from experience with computer implementation. Educational Technology, 36(6), 21-30.
- Dunn, S. L. (2000). The virtualizing of education. The Futurist, 34(2), 34-38. http://www.edu.nutn.edu.tw/gac610/upload/2014061416272468.pdf
- Farwell, K. (2013). Keeping an online class interesting and interactive. Distance Learning, 10(3), 27-32. https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Keeping+an+online+class+interesting+and+interactive-a0369914700
- Gherheș, V., Șimon, S., & Para, I. (2021). Analysing students' reasons for keeping their webcams on or off during online classes. Sustainability, 13(6), 3203. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063203
- Kempf-Leonard, K. (2005). Encyclopedia of social measurement (Vol. 1). Elsevier.
- Khanum, F., & Alam, M. M. (2021). Tertiary level learners' perceptions of Learning English through online class during COVID-19 pandemic: A quantitative approach [Unpublished manuscript]. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Md-Alam-392/publication/352180747_Tertiary_Level_Learners'_Perceptions_of_Learning_English_through_Online_Class_During_Covid-19_Pandemic_A_Quantitative_Approach/links/60be07e492851cb13d84ef21/Tertiary-Level-Learners-Perceptions-of-Learning-English-through-Online-Class-During-Covid-19-Pandemic-A-Quantitative-Approach.pdf
- Knapczyk, D. R., Frey, T. J., & Wall-Marencik, W. (2005). An evaluation of web conferencing in online teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 28(2), 114-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640502800205
- Mahoney, J., & Hall, C. A. (2020). Exploring online learning through synchronous and asynchronous instructional methods. In C. M. Sistek-Chandler (Ed.), Exploring online learning through synchronous and asynchronous instructional methods (pp. 52-76). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1622-5.ch003
- McCaslin, S., & Brown, F. (2014). Software tools for online teaching: A faculty perspective [Paper presentation]. 2014 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Conference, Tulane University New Orleans, Louisiana. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sara-Mccaslin/publication/264861429_SOFTWARE_TOOLS_FOR_ONLINE_TEACHING_A_FACULTY_PERSPECTIVE/links/53f3bd1c0cf2155be3536c5d/SOFTWARE-TOOLS-FOR-ONLINE-TEACHING-A-FACULTY-PERSPECTIVE.pdf
- Mertler, C. A. (2014). Introduction to educational research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Oztok, M., & Brett, C. (2011). Social presence and online learning: A review of the research [Unpublished manuscript]. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/32440
- Preisman, K. A. (2014). Teaching presence in online education: From the instructor's point of view. Online Learning, 18(3), n3. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v18i3.446
- Reese, Q. (2020, March 31). Why you should leave your computer camera on during class lectures on Zoom. The Daily Collegian. https://www.collegian.psu.edu/news/coronavirus/why-you-should-leave-your-computer-camera-on-during-class-lectures-on-zoom-opinion/article_1a61dd4e-72d6-11ea-bf21-eb01a0faa23e.html
- Song, D., Rice, M., & Oh, E. Y. (2019). Participation in online courses and interaction with a virtual agent. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1), 43-62. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3998