Published July 30, 2023 | Version CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Journal article Open

A Comparative Study of Different Software Complexity Metrics in Measuring Software Interoperability

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Department of Information Technology, Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology, Colombo,Western Province, Sri Lanka.
  • 2. Department of Information Technology, Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology, Colombo, Western Province, Sri Lanka.

Contributors

Contact person:

  • 1. Department of Information Technology, Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology, Colombo,Western Province, Sri Lanka.

Description

Abstract: Software interoperability is crucial for organizations that rely on multiple software systems to perform their operations. However, due to the complexity and variety of software systems, ensuring interoperability can be difficult. Measuring software complexity metrics can be used to identify potential problems and assess how well different interoperability strategies work. In this study, we investigated and compared the effectiveness of different software complexity metrics in measuring software interoperability. We used statistical methods to analyze data collected from a sample of software systems. The results of our study show that certain metrics, such as coupling and cohesion, are more effective than others in measuring software interoperability. By selecting appropriate metrics, developers can ensure better productivity, lower costs, and more adaptable use of software systems. The findings of this study have implications for the creation of software and can guide businesses in choosing the right criteria to achieve software interoperability.

Notes

Published By: Lattice Science Publication (LSP) © Copyright: All rights reserved.

Files

B76520712223.pdf

Files (204.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:4b76a5c04f066483fbfdab1e46c48906
204.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
Journal article: 2582-8339 (ISSN)

References

  • Kim, J. (2019). Interoperability in software engineering: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology, 106, 1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2018.09.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2018.09.004
  • Satyanarayanan, M. (2018). Interoperability: What it is and why it matters. Communications of the ACM, 61(10), 29-31. doi: 10.1145/3267300
  • W3C. (n.d.). World Wide Web Consortium. Retrieved, [Online] Available : https://www.w3.org/
  • OGC. (n.d.). Open Geospatial Consortium. Retrieved, [Online] Available: https://www.ogc.org/
  • OMG. (n.d.). Object Management Group. Retrieved, [Online] Available: https://www.omg.org/
  • Shepperd, M., & Kadoda, G. (2002). Measuring software complexity: a case study in interoperability. Journal of Systems and Software, 60(1), 23-32. doi: 10.1016/s0164-1212(01)00174-1.
  • Chang, C. K., & Yeh, Y. S. (2010). Comparing software complexity metrics for measuring software interoperability. Journal of Systems and Software, 83(3), 390-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.09.033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2009.09.033
  • Oussalah, M., & Boufaïda, Z. (2014). Software complexity metrics for measuring software interoperability: a comparative study. Procedia Computer Science, 32, 1024-1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.459
  • Chang, C. K., & Yeh, Y. S. (2010). Comparing software complexity metrics for measuring software interoperability. Journal of Systems and Software, 83(3), 390-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2009.09.033
  • Oussalah, M., & Boufaïda, Z. (2014). Software complexity metrics for measuring software interoperability: a comparative study. Procedia Computer Science, 32, 1024-1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.459
  • Chang, C. K., & Yeh, C. W. (2010). The comparison of software complexity metrics for measuring software interoperability. Journal of Systems and Software, 83(6), 962-971. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.11.778
  • Oussalah, M., & Boufaïda, Z. (2014). Measuring software interoperability based on software complexity metrics: A comparative study. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 26(8), 745-761. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1601
  • Babu, G. V. S., & Menon, R. (2018). A comparative study of software complexity metrics for measuring interoperability of software systems. In 2018 3rd International Conference on Computational Systems and Information Technology for Sustainable Solution (CSITSS) (pp. 7-11). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/CSITSS.2018.8539826
  • Bhardwaj, N., & Singh, R. (2019). A comparative study of software complexity metrics in measuring interoperability of software systems. In 2019 5th International Conference on Computing Sciences (ICCS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ICCS46853.2019.8988061
  • Apache Hadoop website [Online] Available : https://hadoop.apache.org/
  • Kreps, J., Narkhede, N., & Rao, J. (2011). Kafka: A distributed messaging system for log processing. In Proceedings of the NetDB (Vol. 11, pp. 1-7)
  • Toshniwal, A., Taneja, S., Shukla, A., Ramasamy, K., Patel, J. M., Kulkarni, S. R., ... & Murthy, R. (2014, October).
  • Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., ... & Kudlur, M. (2016). TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning. In 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 16) (pp. 265-283).
  • Paszke, A., Gross, S., Chintala, S., Chanan, G., Yang, E., DeVito, Z., ... & Lerer, A. (2017). Automatic differentiation in PyTorch. In NIPS-W (pp. 1-4).
  • Babu, G. V. S., & Menon, R. (2018). A comparative study of software complexity metrics for measuring interoperability of software systems. In 2018 3rd International Conference on Computational Systems and Information Technology for Sustainable Solution (CSITSS) (pp. 7-11). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/CSITSS.2018.8539826
  • Chang, C. K., & Yeh, C. W. (2010). The comparison of software complexity metrics for measuring software interoperability. Journal of Systems and Software, 83(6), 962-971. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.11.778
  • Walia, G., & Kaur, A. (2019). A systematic review on software complexity metrics. Journal of Systems and Software, 157, 110406. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.11040

Subjects

ISSN: 2582-8339(Online)
https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/2582-8339#
Retrieval Number:100.1/ijsepm.B76520712223
https://www.ijsepm.latticescipub.com/portfolio-item/B76520712223/
Journal Website: www.ijsepm.latticescipub.com
https://www.ijsepm.latticescipub.com/
Publisher: Lattice Science Publication (LSP)
https://www.latticescipub.com/