RESPONSIBILITY OF A LAND DEED OFFICIAL IN A MERGER LAWSUITS FOR TORT AND DEFAULT (DECISION STUDY: 217/PDT.G/2017/PN.MLG)

The judges legal consideration in combining tort and default claims is justified. In District Court Decision Number 217/Pdt.g/2017/PN.Mlg stated that Defendant I had been proven to have committed an act of default for not paying off the dependents on the payment for the sale and purchase of land and buildings, and Defendant II had been proven to have committed an torfOnrecht for making and using notarial sale and purchase agreement in violation of the law, so that it caused losses to the Plaintiff.The research method used is normative juridical, using secondary data from library research. The panel of judges in accepting the merger of tort and default lawsuits was carried out by analyzing whether the two lawsuits were closely related. So if the two lawsuits have a close relationship between one and the other lawsuit, then the merger lawsuit can be justified, where the merger of the lawsuit can create a simple, fast and light cost court, and can avoid conflicting decisions.