Published July 12, 2023 | Version v1
Conference paper Open

Open innovation and crowdsourcing research: A bibliometric mapping and cluster analysis using VOSviewer and Biblioshiny

Authors/Creators

  • 1. North-West University, South Africa

Description

This paper reveals the developments of open innovation and crowdsourcing research in business and management through bibliometric literature analysis. The authors collected documents from Scopus and analyzed the data using Biblioshiny, RStudio package for descriptive analysis, and VOSviewer for science mapping. Useful insights resulted in the most cited contributions in open innovation and crowdsourcing research by different authors, research articles, and journals through cluster analysis. This study adds value to open innovation and crowdsourcing research by analyzing the bibliometric data during 2013–2022. Future studies may consider collaboration and increased footprint across emerging markets such as Africa, India and South America.

Notes

Academy of Business and Emerging Markets 2023 Conference abem.ca/conference

Files

abem-2023-conference-proceedings-2.pdf

Files (661.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:aef775cee80067242a8e44d870b580a0
661.2 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Afuah A & Tucci CL 2012. Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 355-375.
  • Bogers M, Chesbrough H & Moedas C 2018. Open Innovation: Research, Practices, and Policies. California Management Review, 60(2), 5–16.
  • Bogers M, Zobel AK, Afuah A, Almirall E, Brunswicker S, Dahlander L, … Ter Wal ALJ 2017. The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 8-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1240068
  • Brunswicker S & Van de Vrande V 2014. Exploring open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises. New Frontiers in Open Innovation, 1, 135-156.
  • ChesbChesbrough H 2006. Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Harvard Business Press.rough H & Bogers M 2014. Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. New Frontiers in Open Innovation. 3-28 Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dahlander L & Gann DM 2010. How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699-709.
  • Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N & Lim WM 2021. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.
  • Eftekhari N & Bogers M 2015. Open for entrepreneurship: How open innovation can foster new venture creation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(4), 574-584.
  • Egger R, Gula I & Walcher D 2016. Open tourism: Open innovation, crowdsourcing and co-creation challenging the tourism industry. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Elmquist M, Fredberg T & Ollila S 2009. Exploring the field of open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 12(3), 326–345.
  • Foss NJ, Lyngsie J & Zahra SA 2013. The role of external knowledge sources and organizational design in the process of opportunity exploitation. Strategic Management Journal, 34(12), 1453-1471.
  • Gassmann O, Enkel E & Chesbrough H 2010. The future of open innovation. R&d Management, 40(3), 213–221.
  • Ghezzi A, Gabelloni D, Martini A & Natalicchio A 2018. Crowdsourcing: A review and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(2), 343-363.
  • Howe J 2006. The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine, 14(6), 1–4.
  • Jeppesen LB & Lakhani KR 2010. Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organization Science, 21(5), 1016-1033.
  • Laursen K & Salter A 2006. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic management journal, 27(2), 131-150.
  • Randhawa K, Wilden R & Hohberger J 2016. A bibliometric review of open innovation: Setting a research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(6), 750-772.
  • Scuotto V, Del Giudice M, Bresciani S & Meissner D 2017. Knowledge-driven preferences in informal inbound open innovation modes. An explorative view on small to medium enterprises. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(3), 640-655.
  • Singh S & Bashar A 2023. A bibliometric review on the development in e-tourism research. International Hospitality Review, 37(1), 71–93.
  • Terwiesch C & Xu Y 2008. Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem-solving. Management Science, 54(9), 1529-1543.
  • Van de Vrande V, De Jong JP, Vanhaverbeke W & De Rochemont M 2009. Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6/7), 423-437.
  • Vanhaverbeke W & Cloodt M 2014. Theories of the firm and open innovation. New frontiers in Open Innovation, 256.
  • West J & Bogers M 2014. Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814-831.
  • West J, Salter A, Vanhaverbeke W & Chesbrough H 2014. Open innovation: The next decade. Research Policy, 43(5), 805-811.
  • Zobel AK, Balsmeier B & Chesbrough H 2016. Does patenting help or hinder open innovation? Evidence from new entrants in the solar industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(2), 307-331.