Requirements Analysis for an e-Government System to Support Multi-Organisational Collaborative Groups
Description
We present a conceptual architecture for a Group Support System (GSS) to facilitate Multi-Organisational Collaborative Groups (MOCGs) initiated by local government and including external organisations of various types. Multi-Organisational Collaborative Groups (MOCGs) consist of individuals from several organisations which have agreed to work together to solve a problem. The expectation is that more can be achieved working in harmony than separately. Work is done interdependently, rather than independently in diverse directions. Local government, faced with solving complex social problems, deploy MOCGs to enable solutions across organisational, functional, professional and juridical boundaries, by involving statutory, voluntary, community, not-for-profit and private organisations. This is not a silver bullet as it introduces new pressures. Each member organisation has its own goals, operating context and particular approaches, which can be expressed as their norms and business processes. Organisations working together must find ways of eliminating differences or mitigating their impact in order to reduce the risks of collaborative inertia and conflict. A GSS is an electronic collaboration system that facilitates group working and can offer assistance to MOCGs. Since many existing GSSs have been primarily developed for single organisation collaborative groups, even though there are some common issues, there are some difficulties peculiar to MOCGs, and others that they experience to a greater extent: a diversity of primary organisational goals among members; different funding models and other pressures; more significant differences in other information systems both technologically and in their use than single organisations; greater variation in acceptable approaches to solve problems. In this paper, we analyse the requirements of MOCGs led by local government agencies, leading to a conceptual architecture for an e-government GSS that captures the relationships between 'goal', 'context', 'norm', and 'business process'. Our models capture the dynamics of the circumstances surrounding each individual representing an organisation in a MOCG along with the dynamics of the MOCG itself as a separate community. This record was migrated from the OpenDepot repository service in June, 2017 before shutting down.
Files
paper_069.pdf
Files
(1.2 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:3ebfe3ec5990a176b46cd3e74241cfbe
|
1.2 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Ackermann, F., Franco, L., Gallupe, B. & Parent, M. (2005), "GSS for Multi-Organizational Collaboration: Reflections on Process and Content". Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 14, No.4, pp. 307-331. Barkhi, R. (2002), "Cognitive Style May Mitigate the Impact of Communication Mode". Information & Management, Vol. 39, No. 8, pp. 677-688. Bjorn, P. & Ngwenyama, O. (2008), "Virtual Team Collaboration: Building Shared Meaning, Resolving Breakdowns and Creating Translucence". Information Systems Journal, doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2575.2007.00281.x Chen, F., Briggs, R. O., Corbitt, G., Nunamaker Jr., J. F., Sager, J. & Gardiner, S. C. (2006) Project Progress Tracking Template — Using a Repeatable GSS Process to Facilitate Project Process Management Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06) Track 1. Hawaii IEEE Computer Society. Chief Information Office (2005), Transformational Government – Enabled by Technology, Cabinet Office, available at: http://www.cio.gov.uk/transformational_government/localgovt/index.asp (accessed February 2008) Eden, C. & Huxham, C. (2001), "The Negotiation of Purpose in Multi-Organizational Collaborative Groups". Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 373-391. Franco, L. A. (2006), "Assessing the Impact of Problem Structuring Methods in Multi-Organizational Settings: An Empirical Investigation". Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 58, No. 6, pp. 760-768. Gray, B. (1996), "Cross-Sectoral Partners: Collaborative Alliances Amongst Business, Government and Communities", In Huxham, C. (Ed.) Creating Collaborative Advantage, Sage Publications Ltd, pp. 57-79 Harris, J. & Sun, L. (2008) A Conceptual Model for a Group Support System in Local Councils' In Cordeiro, J. & Joaquim, F. (Eds.) 10th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems. Barcelona, Spain. Himmelman, A. T. (1996), "On the Theory and Practice of Transformational Collaboration: From Social Service to Social Justice", In Huxham, C. (Ed.) Creating Collaborative Advantage, Sage Publications Ltd, pp. 19-43 Hu, P. J., Cui, D. & Sherwood, A. C. (2006) Examining Cross-Agency Collaborations in E-Government Initiatives. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2006. Huxham, C. (1996), "Collaboration and Collaborative Advantage", In Huxham, C. (Ed.) Creating Collaborative Advantage, Sage Publications Ltd, pp. 1-18 Jive Software (2001) Clearspace, available at: http://www.jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace (accessed 23 July 2008) Kishi, M. (2008), "Perceptions and Use of Electronic Media: Testing the Relationship between Organizational Interpretation Differences and Media Richness". Information & Management, Vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 281-287. Kock, N. (2005), "What Is E-Collaboration?", International Journal of e-Collaboration, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. i-vii. Luna-Reyes, L. F., Gil-Garcia, J. R. & Cruz, C. B. (2007) Collaborative Digital Government in Mexico: Some Lessons from Federal Web-Based Interorganizational Information Integration Initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, doi:10.1016/j.giq.2007.04.003 McGuire, M. (2006), "Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It". Public Administration Review, Vol. 66, No. s1, pp. 33-43. Microsoft (2007) SharePoint Server 2007, available at: http://www.microsoft.com/Sharepoint/default.mspx (accessed 23 July 2008) MindTouch (2008) MindTouch Deki, available at: http://wiki.mindtouch.com/ (accessed Otondo, R. F., Van Scotter, J. R., Allen, D. G. & Palvia, P. (2008), "The Complexity of Richness: Media, Message, and Communication Outcomes". Information & Management, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 21- 30. Ranade, W. & Hudson, B. (2003), "Conceptual Issues in Inter-Agency Collaboration". Local Government Studies, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 32-50 Stamper, R., Liu, K., Hafkamp, M. & Ades, Y. (2000), "Understanding the Roles of Signs and Norms in Organizations - a Semiotic Approach to Information Systems Design". Behaviour and Information Technology, Vol. 19, No. 15-27. Traunmuller, R. & Wimmer, M. (2000) Processes-Collaboration-Norms-Knowledge: Signposts for Administrative Application Development. Proceedings. 11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications 2000. Vangen, S. & Huxham, C. (2003), "Enacting Leadership for Collaborative Advantage: Dilemmas of Ideology and Pragmatism in the Activities of Partnership Managers". British Journal of Management, Vol. 14, No. S61-S76. Williams, P. (2002), "The Competent Boundary Spanner". Public Administration, Vol. 80, No. 1, pp. 103-124. Yamagishi, T. (2003), "Trust and Social Intelligence in Japan", In Schwartz, F. J. & Pharr, S. J. (Eds.) The State of Civil Society in Japan, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 281-297 Yamagishi, T., Cook, K. S. & Watabe, M. (1998), "Uncertainty, Trust, and Commitment Formation in the United States and Japan". The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 104, No. 1, pp. 165-194.