Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published August 31, 2004 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Phylogeny of Maculinea blues (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) based on morphological and ecological characters: evolution of parasitic myrmecophily

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Department of Zoology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, CZ-37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
  • 2. Department of Zoology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, CZ-37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic & Institute of Entomology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Branišovská 31, CZ-37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic

Description

Pech, Pavel, Fric, Zdenek, Konvicka, Martin, Zrzavy, Jan (2004): Phylogeny of Maculinea blues (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) based on morphological and ecological characters: evolution of parasitic myrmecophily. Cladistics 20 (4): 362-375, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2004.00031.x, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2004.00031.x

Files

source.pdf

Files (474.8 kB)

Name Size
md5:7b752fed5314919f0613e1dc4278386b
474.8 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:7B75FFED5314FF9F0613FFDC4278386B

Related works

Has part
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/5B9A660B5315FF9E0662FCF840623B01 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8083845 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8083847 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8083849 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8083851 (DOI)

References

  • Agenjo, R., 1967. Morfologia y distribucion geografica en Espana de la ̒Escamas azules̕ Glaucpsyche melanops (B., 1828) (Lep. Lycaenidae). Eos, 43, 13-20.
  • Akino, T., Knapp, J.J., Thomas, J.A., Elmes, G.W., 1999. Chemical mimicry and host specificity in the butterfly Maculinea rebeli, a social parasite of Myrmica ant colonies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 266, 1419-1426.
  • Als, T.D., Nash, D.R., Boomsma, J.J., 2002. Geographical variation in host-ant specificity of the parasitic butterfly Maculinea alcon in Denmark. Ecol. Entomol. 27, 403-414.
  • Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 141, 399-436.
  • Asahi, J., Kanda, S., Kawata, M., Kohara, Y., 1999. The Butterflies of Sakhalin in Nature. Hokkaido Shimbun Press, Sapporo, Japan.
  • Balint, Z., 1989. Hairstreaks, coppers and blues from Mongolia (Lep., Lycaenidae). Atalanta, 19, 87-100.
  • Beldade, P., Koops, K., Brakefield, P.M., 2002. Modularity, individuality, and evo-devo in butterfly wings. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 14262-14267.
  • Benes, J., Konvieka, M., Dvooak, J., Fric, Z., Havelda, Z., Pavlieko, A., Vrabec. V., Weidenhoffer, Z., 2002. Butterflies of the Czech Republic: Distribution and Conservation. Spoleenost pro ochranu motylu, Praha.
  • Berlov, O., 2001. Tsvetnoi Atlas-Opredelitel' Dnevnykh Babochek Basseina Ozera Baikal [Coloured Determination Key of the Butterflies of the Lake Baikal Basin]. URL: http://babochki.narod.ru.
  • Bernardi, G., 1972. Note sur la variation geographique de l'armure genitale male des Iolana (Lep. Lycaenidae). B. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 77, 160-167.
  • Beuret, H., 1958. Zur systematischen Stellung einiger wenig bekannter Glaucopsychidi (Lep., Lycaenidae). Mitt. Entomol. Ges. Basel, 8, 81-100.
  • Brakefield, P.M., 2003. The power of evo-devo to explore evolutionary constraints: experiments with butterfly eyespots. Zoology, 106, 283-290.
  • Cano, J.M., 1981. Similitudes biologicas y diferentias ecologicas entre Glaucopsyche alexis (Poda) y Glaucopsyche melanops (Boisduval). (Lep. Lycaenidae). B. Estation Centr. Ecol. 10, 59-70.
  • D'Abrera, B., 1993. Butterflies of Holarctic region III. Nymphalidae (Concl.), Libytheidae, Riodinidae & Lycaenidae. Hill House, Black Rock, pp. 336-524.
  • Ebert, G., Rennwald, E., 1991. Die Schmetterlinge Baden-Wurttembergs. Band 1: Tagfalter 2. Eugen Ulmer, Hohenheim.
  • Elfferich, N.W., 1998. New facts on the life history of the dusky large blue Maculinea nausithous (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) obtained by breeding with Myrmica ants in plaster nests. Deinsea, 4, 97-102.
  • Eliot, J.N., 1973. The higher classification of the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera): a tentative arrangement. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Entomology), 28, 373-505.
  • Elmes, G.W., Akino, T., Thomas, J.A., Clarke, R.T., Knapp, J.J., 2002. Intespecific differences in cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of Myrmica ants are sufficiently consistent to explain host specificity by Maculinea (large blue) butterflies. Oecologia, 130, 525-535.
  • Elmes, G.W., Thomas, J.A., 1992. Complexity of species conservation in managed habitats: interaction between Maculinea butterflies and their ant hosts. Biodivers. Conserv. 1, 155-169.
  • Elmes, G.W., Thomas, J.A., Munguira, M.L., Fiedler, K., 2001. Larvae of lycaenid butterflies that parasitize ant colonies provide exceptions to normal insect growth rules. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 73, 259-278.
  • Elmes, G.W., Thomas, J.A., Wardlaw, J.C., 1991. Larvae of Maculinea rebeli, a large-blue butterfly, and their Myrmica host ants: wild adoption and behaviour in ant-nests. J. Zool. 223, 447-460.
  • Emmet, A.M., Heath, J., 1989. The Moths and Butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland, Vol. 7, Part 1. Hesperiidae-Nymphalidae. The Butterflies. Harley Books, Colchester, UK.
  • Fiedler, K., 1990. New information on the biology of Maculinea nausithous and M. teleius. Nota Lepid. 12, 246-256.
  • Fiedler, K., 1991. Systematic, evolutionary, and ecological implications of myrmecophily within the Lycaenidae [Insecta: Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea]. Bonner Zoologische Monographien, no. 31.
  • Fiedler, K., 1994. Lycaenid butterflies and plants: is myrmecophily associated with amplified hostplant diversity? Ecol. Entomol. 19, 79-82.
  • Fiedler, K., 1995. Lycaenid butterflies and plants - is myrmecophily associated with particular hostplant preferences? Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 7, 107-132.
  • Fiedler, K., 1998. Lycaenid-ant interactions of the Maculinea type: tracing their historical roots in a comparative framework. J. Insect Conserv. 2, 3-14.
  • Freudenstein, J.V., Pickett, K., Simmons, M.P., Wenzel, J.W., 2003. From basepairs to birdsongs: phylogenetic data in the age of genomics. Cladistics, 19, 333-347.
  • Fukuda, H., Hama, E., Kuzuya, T., Takahashi, A., Takahashi, M., Tanaka, B., Tanaka, H., Wakabayashi, M., Watanabe, Y., 1985. The Life Histories of Butterflies in Japan, Vol. III. Hoikusha, Osaka, Japan.
  • Goloboff, P., 1999. NONA (NO NAME), Version 2.0. Published by the author, Tucuman, Argentina. URL: http://www.cladistics.com/ aboutNona.htm.
  • Grant, T., Kluge, A.G., 2003. Data exploration in phylogenetic inference: scientific, heuristic, or neither. Cladistics, 19, 379-418.
  • Hemming, A.F., 1931. Revision of the genus Iolana, Bethune-Baker (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Trans. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 79, 323- 333.
  • Hesselbarth, G., Van Oorschot, H., Wagener, S., 1995. Die Tagfalter der Turkei unter Berucksichtingung der angrenzenden Lander. Selbstverlag Sigbert Wagener, Bocholt.
  • Higgins, L.G., 1975. The Classification of European Butterflies. Collins, London.
  • Hochberg, M.E., Clarke, R.T., Elmes, G.W., Thomas, J.A., 1994. Population dynamic consequences of direct and indirect interactions involving a large blue butterfly and its plant and red hosts. J. Anim. Ecol. 63, 375-391.
  • Igarashi, S., Fukuda, H., 2000. The Life History of Asian Butterflies, 2. Tokai Daigaku Shuppankai, Tokyo.
  • Inomata, T., 1990. Keys to the Japanese Butterflies in Natural Color. Hokuryukan, Tokyo.
  • Jaksic, P.N., 1998. Male Genitalia of Butterflies on the Balkan Peninsula with a Checklist (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea and Papilionoidea). Slamka, Bratislava.
  • Janz, N., Nyblom, K., Nylin, S., 2001. Evolutionary dynamics of host- plant specialization: a case study of the tribe Nymphalini. Evolution, 55, 783-796.
  • Karsholt, O., Razowski, J., 1996. The Lepidoptera of Europe: a Distributional Checklist. Apollo Books, Stenstrup.
  • Kawazoe, A., Wakabayshi, M., 1976. Colored Illustrations of the Butterflies of Japan. Hoikusha Publishing, Osaka.
  • Korshunov, Y., Gorbunov, P., 1995. Dnevnye Babochki Aziatskoi Chasti Rossii: Spravochnik [Butterflies of the Asian Part of Russia: a Handbook]. Ural University Press, Ekaterinburg.
  • Kudrna, O., 2001. Miscellaneous notes on the taxonomy of four European butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera). Entomol. Gaz. 52, 253-261.
  • Kurentsov, A.I., 1970. Bulavousye Cheshuekryle Dalnego Vostoka SSSR: Opredelitel' [Rhopaloceran Butterflies of Far East of the USSR: A Key to Determination.] Nauka, Leningrad.
  • Larsson, S., Ekbom, B., 1995. Oviposition mistakes in herbivorous insects: confusion, or a step towards a new host plant? Oikos, 72, 155-160.
  • Leimar, O., Axen, A., 1993. Strategic behaviour in an interspecific mutualism: interactions between lycaenid larvae and ants. Anim. Behav. 46, 1177-1182.
  • Mattoni, R.H.T., 1977. The Scolitantidini I: Two new genera and a generic rearrangement (Lycaenidae). J. Res. Lepid. 16, 223-242.
  • Mattoni, R.H.T., [1981] 1979. The Scolitantidini II. The World's smallest butterfly? Notes on Turanana, and a new genus and species from Afghanistan. (Lycaenidae). J. Res. Lepid. 18, 256-264.
  • Mattoni, R.H.T., Fiedler, K., 1991. On the functional foreleg tarsus in Caerulea males (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae: Polyommatini). J. Res. Lepid. 30, 289-296.
  • Nijhout, H.F., 1991. The Development and Evolution of Butterfly Wing Pattern. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  • Park, K.T., Kim, S.S., 1997. Atlas of Butterflies (Lepidoptera). Insects of Korea, Series 1. Korea. Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology and Center for Insect Systematics, Chuncheon.
  • Pierce, N.E., Braby, M.F., Heath, A., Lohman, D.J., Mathew, J., Rand, D.B., Travassos, M.A., 2002. The ecology and evolution of ant association in the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera). Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47, 733-771.
  • Renwick, J.A.A., Chew, F.S., 1994. Oviposition behavior in Lepidoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39, 377-400.
  • Shirozu, T., 1960. Butterflies of Formosa in Color. Hoikosha, Osaka, Japan.
  • Sibatani, A., Saigusa, T., Hirowatari, T., 1994. The genus Maculinea van Eecke, 1915 (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) from East Palaearctic Region. Tyo to Ga, 44, 157-220.
  • Stankiewicz, A., Sielezniew, M., 2002. Host specificity of Maculinea teleius Bgstr. and M. nausithous Bgstr. (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): the new insight. Ann. Zool. 52, 403-408.
  • Steiner, F.M., Sielezniew, M., Schlick-Steiner, B.C., Hottinger, H., Stankiewicz, A., Gornicki, A., 2003. Host specificity revisited: new data on Myrmica host ants of the lycaenid butterfly Maculinea rebeli. J. Insect Conserv. 7, 1-6.
  • Thomas, J.A., 1980. Why did the large blue become extinct in Britain? Oryx, 15, 243-247.
  • Thomas, J.A., 1994. The ecology and conservation of Maculinea arion and other European species of large blue. In: Pullin, A.S. (Ed.), Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 180-196.
  • Thomas, J.A., Elmes, G.W., 1998. Higher productivity at the cost of increased host-specificity when Maculinea butterfly larvae exploit ant colonies through trophallaxis rather than by predation. Ecol. Entomol. 23, 457-464.
  • Thomas, J.A., Elmes, G.W., Wardlaw, J.C., Woyciechowski, M., 1989. Host specificity among Maculinea butterflies in Myrmica ant nests. Oecologia, 79, 452-457.
  • Thomas, J.A., Munguira, M.L., Martin, J., Elmes, G.W., 1991. Basal hatching by Maculinea butterfly eggs: a consequence of advanced myrmecophily? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 44, 175-184.
  • Tolman, T., Lewington, R., 1997. Butterflies of Britain and Europe. Harper and Collins, London.
  • Tuzov, V.K., Bogdanov, P.V., Churkin, S.V., Devyatkin, A.L., Danchenko, A.V., Murzin, V.S., Samodurov, G.D., Zhdanko,A.B., 2000. Guide to the Butterflies of Russia and Adjacent Territories (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera), Vol. 2: Libytheidae, Danaidae, Nymphalidae, Riodinidae, and Lycaenidae. Pensoft, Sofia.
  • Van Swaay, C.A.M., Warren, M.S., 1999. Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and Environment Series No. 99. Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
  • Vane-Wright, R.I., 2003. Evidence and identity in butterfly systematics. In: Boggs, C.L., Watt, W.B., Ehrlich, P.R. (Eds.), Butterflies: Ecology and Evolution Taking Flight. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 477-513.
  • Wahlberg, N., 2001. The phylogenetics and biochemistry of host-plant specialization in Melitaeine butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Evolution, 55, 522-537.
  • Wahlberg, N., Nylin, S., 2003. Morphology versus molecules: resolution of the positions of Nymphalis, Polygonia, and related genera (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Cladistics, 19, 213-223.
  • Wardlaw, J.C., Elmes, G.W., Thomas, J.A., 1998. Techniques for studying Maculinea butterflies. II. Identification guide to Myrmica ants found on Maculinea sites in Europe. J. Insect Conserv. 2, 119- 127.
  • Wardlaw, J.C., Thomas, J.A., Elmes, G.W., 2000. Do Maculinea rebeli caterpillars provide vestigial mutualistic benefits to ants when living as social parasites inside Myrmica ant nests? Entomol. Exp. Appl. 95, 97-103.
  • Wynhoff, I., 1998a. Lessons from the reintroduction of Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous in the Netherlands. J. Insect Conserv. 2, 47-57.
  • Wynhoff, I., 1998b. The recent distribution of the European Maculinea species. J. Insect Conserv. 2, 15-27.