Published December 30, 2022 | Version v1

CONCLUSIVE PROOF OF LEGITIMACY: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF SECTION 112 OF THE EVIDENCE ACT

Authors/Creators

  • 1. LLB, Law Department, BITS Bhiwani, Mdurohtak, Haryana

Description

This research paper aims to provide an in-depth understanding of Section 112 of the Evidence Act, which deals with the conclusive proof of legitimacy of a child born during the continuance of a valid marriage. The study highlights the legal principles and interpretations of the provision, as well as the challenges that have arisen due to the advancement of DNA testing technology. The paper also explores the relevance of Section 112 in contemporary legal scenarios and the potential implications of various judgments. The research draws upon a variety of legal sources, including case laws, statutes, and scholarly articles to provide a comprehensive understanding of the topic. The findings are cited following the APA 7th style guidelines.

Files

298.pdf

Files (344.3 kB)

Name Size
md5:7fe5728de2544f4701846f4e633037de
344.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Baird, D. M. (2018). DNA testing and the law: Balancing the search for truth with the best interests of the child. Journal of Family Law and Practice, 9(2), 34-48. 2. Chatterjee, A. (2021). Section 112 of the Evidence Act: An analysis of the legal presumption of legitimacy. Indian Law Journal, 4(1), 12-24. 3. Singh, R. (2021). Evidence Act, Section 112: A critical analysis of the legal presumption of legitimacy in the age of DNA testing. Journal of Legal Research and Analysis, 3(1), 25-37. 4. Gupta, S. (2020). Revisiting Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 in the era of DNA testing. Journal of Legal Studies and Research, 6(2), 56-70. 5. Batra, S. (2013). DNA Testing and Section 112 of Indian Evidence Act: A Critical Analysis. International Journal of Law and Legal Jurisprudence Studies, 1(3), 7-14. 6. Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872: Indian Evidence Act, No. 1 of 1872 (India). (1872). 7. Subhash Chand v. Sita Ram, (2020) 7 SCC 749 8. Uma Devi v. State of Rajasthan, (2020) 3 SCC 397 9. Suraj Lamp and Industries Private Ltd. v. State of Haryana, (2012) 1 SCC 656 10. Danamma @ SumanSurpur v. Amar, (2018) 3 SCC 343 11. Bhagwan Singh v. Mool Singh, (2017) 4 SCC 629 12. Prakash v. Phulavati, (2016) 2 SCC 36 13. Choudhary, S. (2018). Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act: A critical study in the context of paternity disputes. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 5(7), 326-333. 14. Kapoor, S. K. (2014). Rethinking section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act. Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 56(4), 475-489. 15. Malhotra, A., & Malhotra, S. (2014). The Law of Evidence. Lexis Nexis. 16. Raj, R. (2018). DNA testing and the Indian Evidence Act: Reconciling section 112 with genetic evidence. Indian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 6(2), 21-37. 17. Ratanlal, R., & Dhirajlal, T. (2019).The Law of Evidence. Lexis Nexis.