Published June 16, 2023 | Version v1

CLASSIFICATION OF DISCOURSE ACCORDING TO DISCIPLINE

  • 1. Teacher of Fergana State University
  • 2. student of Ferghana State University

Description

This article deals with the classifications of discourse, their   discipline, function and as well as purpose with examples.

Files

Madazizova Dilafruz Xabibiloyevna 156-161.pdf

Files (404.1 kB)

Name Size
md5:f25851f9aef4f2aa4e0b79a75ce2b6f5
404.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Fairclough, Norman (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • 2. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Spoken and Written Language. Deakin University
  • 3. Kust, T. (2015) University discourse in computer-mediated communication: philosophical, sociological and cultural grounds for linguistic description. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, Elsevier, 409-414
  • 4. Fairclough, Norman (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • 5. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Spoken and Written Language. Deakin University
  • 6. Kust, T. (2015) University discourse in computer-mediated communication: philosophical, sociological and cultural grounds for linguistic description. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, Elsevier, 409-414
  • 7. Locke, Terry. Critical Discourse of Analysis. London: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2004.
  • 8. Osisanwo, W. (2003). Introduction to discourse analysis and pragmatics. Lagos: Femolus-Fetop Publishers.
  • 9. Van Dijk, Teun A. (1984a) Prejudice in Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • 10. Habibiloyevna, M. D. (2021). The Semantic Analysis of Slang in The Movie "School". Journal of Pedagogical Inventions and Practices, 3, 83-85.