Published May 8, 2023 | Version v1
Report Open

InGEPaST project (WP2) Deliverable D.2.1 "Report on the thematic analysis of empirical data"

  • 1. Eurac Research; URV

Description

This report has a fourfold aim:

  • first, it describes the process of the empirical research (WP2) that was carried out with CSOs in South Tyrol and Catalonia between April 2022 (month 4) and March 2023 (month 15) of the InGEPaST project;
  • second, it presents a synthetic and preliminary thematic analysis of the primary data stemming from such empirical research;
  • third, it provides the data analysis and results that are necessary to reply to the first of the abovementioned sub-research question by identifying which are the main social drivers and external factors that influence the intersection of gender and ethnicity in the socioeconomic participation of women and LGBTIAQ+ individuals in South Tyrol and Catalonia and how do they correlate, operate and differentiate;
  • fourth, it supplies the data results that will serve to elaborate the InGEPaST project scientific articles that will be prepared following this deliverable.

The project “The Intersection of Gender and Ethnicity in Socioeconomic Participation in South Tyrol and Catalonia in Post-Pandemic Times (InGEPaST)” is funded by the Autonomous Province of Bolzano-South Tyrol – Innovation, Research, University and Museums Department (Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano-Alto Adige – Ripartizione Innovazione, Ricerca, Università e Musei).

Files

InGEPAST_D.2.1_ReportThematicAnalysis_zenodo.pdf

Files (936.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:01f02eaa83d55ca61d27a0951bc2dfb3
936.2 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Cites
Report: 10.5281/zenodo.6531565 (DOI)
Report: 10.5281/zenodo.6531621 (DOI)
Journal article: 10.1257/jep.35.2.141 (DOI)
Journal article: 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238 (DOI)

References

  • Badgett et al. (2021) LGBTQ Economics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(2), 141-170. DOI: 10.1257/jep.35.2.141
  • Braun V. & Clarke V. (2021) One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328-352, DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
  • Collins P. H. (1990) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Unwin Hyman
  • Crenshaw K. (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139-167
  • Crenshaw K. (1991) Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1279
  • Creswell J. W. (2012). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE, third edition
  • Daly, M. (2020) Gender Inequality and Welfare States in Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing
  • Dobinson I & Johns F. (2014) Qualitative Legal Research. In M. Conville & W. Hong Chui (eds.) Research Methods for Law (16-45). Edinburgh University Press, second edition
  • Henrard, K. (2010), Participation in Social and Economic Life. In M. Weller & K. Nobbs (Eds.) Political Participation of Minorities (524-587). Oxford University Press
  • Kapoor, N. (2020) Gender and Race. In D. Richardson & V. Robinson (Eds.) Introducing Gender and Women's Studies (93-109). Red Globe Press-Macmillan, fifth edition
  • McCall L. (2005) The complexities of Intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771-1800
  • Robson C. & McCartan K. (2016) Real World Research. Wiley, fourth edition