Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published October 30, 2014 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Nature and nurture: Lamarck's legacy

Authors/Creators

Description

Gadjev, Ilya (2014): Nature and nurture: Lamarck's legacy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 114 (1): 242-247, DOI: 10.1111/bij.12439

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:037AFFFDFFCFAF72BC6A6C61FFF1D651

Related works

Cites
Publication: 10.1016/j.mce.2014.07.013 (DOI)
Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7848511 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7848513 (DOI)

References

  • Bard JB. 2011. The next evolutionary synthesis: from Lamarck and Darwin to genomic variation and systems biology. Cell Communication and Signaling 9: 30.
  • Bond DM, Baulcombe DC. 2014. Small RNAs and heritable epigenetic variation in plants. Trends in Cell Biology 24: 100-107.
  • Burkhardt RW. 2013. Lamarck, evolution, and the inheritance of acquired characters. Genetics 194: 793- 805.
  • Crews D, Gillette R, Miller-Crews I, Gore AC, Skinner MK. 2014. Nature, nurture and epigenetics. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2014.07.013.
  • Daxinger L, Whitelaw E. 2012. Understanding transgenerational epigenetic inheritance via the gametes in mammals. Nature Reviews Genetics 13: 153-162.
  • Dias BG, Ressler KJ. 2014. Parental olfactory experience influences behavior and neural structure in subsequent generations. Nature Neuro Science 17: 89-96.
  • Gershenowitz H. 1979. The influence of Lamarckism on the development of Freud's psychoanalytic theory. Indian Journal of History of Science 14: 105-113.
  • Gissis SB, Jablonka E, eds. 2011. Transformations of Lamarckism: from subtle fluids to molecular biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
  • Heard E, Martienssen R. 2014. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: myths and mechanisms. Cell 157: 95-109.
  • Koonin EV, Wolf YI. 2009. Is evolution Darwinian or/and Lamarckian? Biology Direct 4: 42.
  • Liu Y. 2008. A new perspective on Darwin's pangenesis. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 83: 141-149.
  • Mandelstam O. 1986. The noise of time. The prose of Osip Mandelstam. San Francisco, CA: North Point Press.
  • Pharand MW. 2001. Bernard Shaw and the French. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.
  • Radford EJ, Ito M, Shi H, Corish JA, Yamazawa K, Isganaitis E, Seisenberger S, Hore TA, Reik W, Erkek S, Peters AHFM, Patti M, Ferguson-Smith AC. 2014. In utero undernourishment perturbs the adult sperm methylome and intergenerational metabolism. Science 345: 1255903.
  • Roll-Hansen N. 2005. The Lysenko effect: the politics of science. Amherst, New York: Humanity Books.
  • Shaw B. 1921. Back to Methuselah. A metabiological pentateuch. New York, NY: Brentano's.
  • Slavet E. 2008. Freud's 'Lamarckism' and the Politics of Racial Science. Journal of the History of Biology 41: 37-80.
  • Strenger C. 2006. Freud's forgotten evolutionary project. Psychoanalytic Psychology 23: 420-429.
  • Sulloway FJ. 1992. Freud, biologist of the mind: beyond the psychoanalytic legend. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Tollefsbol T, ed. 2014. Transgenerational epigenetics. London, Waltham, San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Veenendaal MVE, Painter RC, de Rooij SR, Bossuyt PMM, van der Post JAM, Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Roseboom TJ. 2013. Transgenerational effects of prenatal exposure to the 1944-45 Dutch famine. BJOG 120: 548-553.