Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published March 19, 2007 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

'Integrative taxonomy' then and now: a response to Dayrat (2005)

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Departamento de Biodiversidad, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, c/Jose Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain
  • 2. Department of Botany, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
  • 3. Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK

Description

Valdecasas, Antonio G., Williams, David, Wheeler, Quentin D. (2008): 'Integrative taxonomy' then and now: a response to Dayrat (2005). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 93: 211-216, DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00919.x

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted. Log in to check if you have access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:C47CFFFB0029C21BFFBDF01AFFD5FFCF

References

  • Ackery PR, Vane-Wright RI. 1984. Milkweed butterflies - their cladistics and biology, being an account of the natural history of the Danainae, a subfamily of the Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae. London: British Museum (Natural History).
  • Avise JC. 1998. The history and purview of phylogeography: a personal reflection. Molecular Ecology 7: 371-379.
  • Bonde N. 1977. Cladistic classification as applied to vertebrates. In: Hecht MK, Goody PC, Hecht BM, eds. Major patterns in vertebrate evolution. New York, NY: Plenum Press, 741-804.
  • Cain AJ. 1954. Animal species and their evolution. London: Hutchinson.
  • Cracraft J. 2000. Species concepts in theoretical and applied biology: a systematic debate with consequences. In: Wheeler QD, Meier R, eds. Species concepts and phylogenetic theory. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Cracraft J, Feinstein J, Vaughn J, Helm-Bychowski K. 1998. Sorting out tigers (Panthera tigris): mitochondrial sequences, nuclear inserts, systematics, and conservation genetics. Animal Conservation 1: 139-150.
  • Dayrat B. 2005. Towards integrative taxonomy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 85: 407-415.
  • De Queiroz K. 1998. The general lineage concept os species: species criteria and the process of speciation. In: Howard DJ, Berlocher SH, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19-31.
  • Dominguez E, Wheeler QD. 1997. Taxonomic stability is ignorance. Cladistics 13: 367-372.
  • Frost DR, Kluge AG. 1994. A consideration of epistemology in systematic biology, with special reference to species. Cladistics 10: 259-294.
  • Ghiselin MT. 1966a. On psychologism in the logic of taxonomic controversies. Systematic Zoology 15: 206-215.
  • Ghiselin MT. 1966b. An application of the theory of definitions to systematic principles. Systematic Zoology 15: 127- 130.
  • Hennig W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  • Hey J. 2006. On the failure of modern species concepts. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21: 447-450.
  • Holling CS. 1998. Two cultures of ecology. Conservation Ecology [Online] 2: 4.
  • Holman EW. 1987. Recognizability of sexual and asexual species of rotifers. Systematic Biology. Systematic Zoology 36: 381-386.
  • Lipscomb DL, Platnick N, Wheeler QD. 2003. The intellectual content of taxonomy: a comment on DNA taxonomy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 65-66.
  • Mayden RL. 1997. A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement of the species problem. In: Claridge MF, Dawah HA, Wilson MR eds. The units of biodiversity - species in practice, Specia l Vol. 54. London: Systematics Association, Chapman & Hall Ltd, 381-424.
  • Maynard Smith J, Szathmary E. 1995. The major transitions in evolution. Oxford: WH Freeman.
  • Moritz C. 1994. Defining 'evolutionarily significant units' for conservation. Trends in Ecological Evology 9: 373-375.
  • Nelson GJ, Platnick NI. 1981. Systematics and biogeography: cladistics and vicariance. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Prendini L. 2005. Comment on 'identifying spiders through DNA barcoding'. Canadian Journal of Zoolology 83: 498- 504.
  • Rising JD, Avise JC. 1993. Application of genealogicalconcordance principles to the taxonomy and evolutionary history of the sharp-tailed sparrow (Ammodramus caudacutus). Auk 110: 844-856.
  • Sites JW, Marshall JC. 2004. Operational criteria for delimiting species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 35: 199-227.
  • Siveter DJ, Sutton MD, Briggs DEG, Siveter DJ. 2004. A Silurian sea spider. Nature 431: 978-980.
  • Sneath PHA, Sokal RR. 1973. Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practice of numerical classification: San Francisco, CA: WH Freeman.
  • Tautz D, Arctander P, Minelli A, Thomas RH, Vogler AP. 2003. A plea for DNA taxonomy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 70-74.
  • Wheeler QD. 1995. The 'old systematics': classification and phylogeny. In: Pakaluk J, Slipinski SA, eds. Biology, phylogeny, and classification of Coleoptera: papers celebrating the 80th birthday of Roy A. Crowson. Warszawa: Muzeum I Instytut Zoologii PAN, 31-62.
  • Wheeler QD. 2004. Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 359: 571-583.