Published April 17, 2023 | Version v1

Radiocarbon ages of 6 ancient holm oaks growing in Montecristo Island, Italy

  • 1. Department of Forest and Agricultural Sciences (DAFNE), University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy
  • 2. Department of Ecological and Biological Sciences (DEB), University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy
  • 3. CEDAD (Centro di Fisica Applicata, Datazione e Diagnostica), Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica "Ennio de Giorgi", Università del Salento, Lecce, Italy
  • 4. BIOME Lab, Department of Biological, Geological & Environmental Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum – University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • 5. Reparto Carabinieri Biodiversità di Follonica, Follonica (GR), Italy

Description

Here we present radiocarbon dates of 6 large and ancient holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) trees collected in Montecristo Island (Tuscany, Italy), reported in the paper “Rediscovering Montecristo’s treasure: the island’s holm oaks reveal exceptional longevity” published in Ecology in 2023. The knowledge of the potential maximum lifespans of trees is a key trait for understanding ecosystem functioning and dynamics. However, old trees present often rotten and hollow trunks; moreover, in Mediterranean environment, false and missing rings can further complicate tree-ring studies. Radiocarbon dating is an interesting solution to overcome these problems. Rotten wood samples were collected from the inner and lowest part of each trunk as close as possible to the hypothesized root “collar” and pith. All the sampled wood fragments showed a moderate tree-ring curvature, but we were not able to calculate a reliable estimate of pith-offset (i.e. of the number of missing rings between the innermost annual increment samples and the pith). However, because of the pith offset and the vertical sampling distance from the collar (up to 1 m), radiocarbon dates may have underestimated tree age by a few decades. Radiocarbon dating was carried out by AMS (Accelerator Mass Spectrometry) at CEDAD, the “Centre of Applied Physics, Dating and Diagnostics”, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy. The difference between the calibrated radiocarbon ages and the year 2022 CE was used to calculate the age of each tree. The calculated age range is between 444±90 (probability 92.3%) calendar years for the youngest sampled tree and 761±42 (probability 91.7%) calendar years for the oldest one.

Notes

The uploaded file reports for each sampled tree the type of dated material, the alphanumeric ID codes assigned by the Dendrologylab and CEDAD institute, the age determined by radiocarbon dating and referred to the year 2022, the diameter at breast height and the elevation above sea level.

Files

Files (11.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:b063bb68f61ae638f77b38c497d78e9a
11.1 kB Download