الترجيح بين أقوال المفسرين في ضؤ تفسير الماوردي (WEIGHTING BETWEEN THE SAYINGS OF THE INTERPRETERS IN THE LIGHT OF TAFSIR UL MAWARDI (ANNUKAT WAL UYUN))
Authors/Creators
- 1. Lecturer, Department of Islamic Studies, Riphah International University Islamabad, & PhD Scholar, Department of Usuluddin, international Islamic university Islamabad.
- 2. Lecturer (Visiting), & PhD Scholar, Department of Usuluddin, international Islamic university Islamabad.
Description
ABSTRACT
When we look at the books of exegesis, we find that there are different opinions while interpreting the meaning of the verse, and each interpretor interpreted the verse according to his own view and diligence. This is how the interpretation of al-Mawardi (Annukat Wal Uyun by al-Mawardi), if we looked at it, we find there are many sayings were gathered in it when he interpret a single verse without any explanation of the reason for the disagreement and the type of disagreement, and without any explanation of the most prefferd saying. And we waver in it when we find in their sayings the contradiction, that is how do we deal with them. In this article, we explain the matter of preferance of one saying when there are many different sayings of the commentators while interpreting a single verse. We need to clarify the types of disagreement first, and then to explain how to deal with this disagreement with the clarity of the three points (acceptance, weighting (prefering) and Unacceptable). This research aims to explain the reason for the disagreement, explain the rules of preference and their uses when there are many sayings and deal with it in the light of the interpretation of Al-Mawardi. And do we reject the other sayings when we prefer a statement or do we accept it. And also we show the effect of the disagreement on the meaning of the verse too.